Accordion Test

Experian’s new global report is now available on how businesses can enhance efficiency, insights, and growth through integration to transform the future of risk strategy. Download report In the ever-evolving financial landscape, the convergence of credit risk, fraud risk, and compliance is becoming a game-changer. Financial institutions (FIs) increasingly recognise the need to integrate these functions to enhance efficiency, gain deeper insights, and drive growth. The 2024 global report on the convergence of credit, fraud, and compliance sheds light on this critical transformation, emphasising how a unified strategy can revolutionise risk management. The report highlights the importance of convergence in shaping the future of financial services. We surveyed 750 leaders in credit risk, fraud risk and compliance in financial services organisations across the world. Inside the report: The need for convergence As technology advances, financial institutions (FIs) face the dual challenge of managing complex systems while simplifying consumer processes. The report reveals that organisations use an average of eight tools across credit, fraud, and compliance, with some using more than ten. This fragmentation leads to inefficiencies and increased risks.In addition, 79% of respondents want to work with fewer vendors to manage credit risk, fraud, and compliance, underscoring the need for streamlined operations. Independent evolution of functions and associated challenges Credit risk, fraud risk, and compliance functions have evolved independently, creating operational silos and technology management challenges. This separation has led to increased fraud and credit losses. The report highlights that only 9% of organisations prioritise these functions equally, with most focusing on fraud. However, 87% of respondents acknowledge the overlap between these areas and are working towards closer collaboration. Regulatory pressures and advanced fraud techniques New regulations in the US, UK, and EU are compelling FIs to reimburse consumers for losses due to scams, increasing the liability for both sending and receiving banks. Penalties for failing to implement effective Anti-Money Laundering (AML) solutions have also intensified. These regulatory demands and advanced fraud techniques necessitate a more integrated approach to risk management. Early stages of convergence While the market is beginning to recognise the benefits of convergence, many FIs are still in the early stages of this journey. The convergence speed varies, but mature organisations have already started or plan to start the process soon. The report shows that 91% of respondents believe that forward-looking companies will centralise these functions within the next three years. However, only 15% prefer a ‘point solution’, 36% prefer a single integrated solution, and 49% prefer modular integration. The role of technology Technology plays a crucial role in integrating functions and managing risk. Next-generation platforms are essential for adapting to market needs, delivering innovative products, and meeting regulatory requirements. The report emphasises the importance of data aggregation, which combines diverse data for deeper insights, and the integration of credit decisioning and fraud detection solutions to balance risk and growth goals simultaneously. Improving risk management through alignment Correctly identifying consumers, managing fraud risk, making informed credit decisions, and ensuring compliance share common ground. The report shows that 57% of respondents believe aligning credit risk, fraud, and compliance functions leads to better overall risk management. Businesses with more centralised practices report improved risk management effectiveness, operational efficiencies, and data integrity. Benefits of convergence The convergence of credit risk, fraud, and compliance offers numerous benefits, including: Improved risk management effectiveness: Better alignment leads to more effective risk management strategies. Operational efficiencies: Streamlined processes and reduced duplication of efforts enhance operational efficiency. Increased data integrity: Centralised data management ensures consistency and accuracy. Cost reduction: Consolidation of functions and technology reduces costs. Enhanced customer experience: A unified approach improves customer recognition and service across all channels. Read the report to find out how to prove value through integration. Download report

Credit professionals from a range of banks, telcos and financial services businesses gathered in London’s Kings Place in June for one of the highlights of the Experian decisioning community: FutureForum. We take a look at the highlights.

Lenders are using automation across the credit lifecycle and intend to invest further in the next 12 months. We look at the use cases for automation and address the key challenges lenders face when automating decisions.

New IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Enterprise Fraud Solutions 2024 Vendor assessment provides valuable resource as organizations face increased fraud.

With the potential annual value of AI and analytics for global banking estimated to reach $1 trillion,1 financial institutions are seeking out efficient ways to implement insights-driven lending. As regulators continue to supervise risk management, lenders must balance the opportunity presented by AI to determine risk more accurately while growing approval rates and reducing the cost of acquisition, with the ability to explain decisions. The challenge of using AI in building credit risk models In a recent study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Experian, the top pain points for technology decision makers in financial services were reported to be automation and availability of data.2 The implementation of accessible AI solutions in credit risk management allows businesses to improve efficiency and time-to-market metrics by widening data sources, improving automation and decreasing risk. But the implementation of AI and machine learning in credit risk models can pose other challenges. The study also found that 31% of respondents felt that their organization could not clearly explain the reasoning behind credit decisions to customers.2 Although AI has been proven to improve the accuracy of predictive credit risk models, these advancements mean that many organizations need support in understanding and explaining the outcomes of AI-powered decisions to fulfil regulatory obligations, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). Moving from traditional model development methodologies to Machine Learning (ML) As lenders move away from traditional parametric models like logistic regression, to ML models like neural nets or tree-based ensemble methods, explainability becomes more complex. Logistic regression has for many years allowed for a clear understanding of the linear relationships between model attributes and the outcome (approval or decline). Once the model is estimated, it is completely explainable. However, ML models are non-parametric, so there are no underlying assumptions made around the distribution (shape) of the sample. Furthermore, the relationships between attributes and outcomes are not assumed to be linear – they’re often non-linear and complex, involving interactions. Such models are perceived to be black boxes where data is consumed as an input, processed and a decision is made without any visibility around the inner dynamics of the model. At the same time, it is possible for ML models to perform better when accurately classifying good customers and those deemed delinquent. Ensuring transparency and explainability is crucial – lenders must be able to identify and explain the most dominant attributes that contribute towards a decision to lend or not. They must also provide ‘reason codes’ at the customer level so any declined applicants can fully understand the main cause and have a path to remediation. The importance of developing transparent and explainable models By prioritizing the development of transparent and interpretable models, financial institutions can also better foster equitable lending practices. However, fair credit decisioning goes beyond the regulatory and ethical obligations – it also makes business sense. Unfair lending leads to higher default rates if creditworthiness is not accurately assessed, therefore increasing bad debts. Removing demographics considered to be the ‘unscored’ or ‘underserved’ (those who are credit worthy but do not have a traditional data trail, but instead a digital footprint comprised of alternative data) can also limit portfolio opportunity for businesses. For these reasons, it is critical to remove or minimize model bias. Bias is an upstream issue that starts at the data collection stage and model algorithm selections. Models developed using logistic regression or machine learning algorithms can be made fairer through carefully selecting attributes relevant to credit decisioning and avoiding sensitive attributes like race, gender, or ethnicity. Wherever sensitive metrics are used, they should be down-weighted to suppress their impact on lending decisions. Some other techniques to mitigate bias include: Thoroughly reviewing the data samples used in modelling. Fair Model Training – Train models using fairness-aware techniques. This may involve adjusting the training process to penalise any discrimination that creeps in. According to Forrester, an essential component of a decisioning platform is one that can “harness the power of AI while enhancing and governing it with well-proven and trusted human business expertise. The best automated decisions come from a combination of both.”3 Developing explainable models goes some way towards reducing bias, but making the decisions explainable to regulatory bodies is a separate issue, and in the digital age of AI, can require deep domain expertise to fulfil. While AI-powered decisioning can help businesses make smarter decisions, they also need the ability to confidently explain their lending practices to stay compliant. With the help of an expert partner, organizations can gain an understanding of what contributed most to a decision and receive detailed and transparent documentation for use with regulators. This ensures lenders can safely grow approval rates, be more inclusive, and better serve their customers. “The solution isn’t simply finding better ways to convey how a system works; rather, it’s about creating tools and processes that can help even the deep expert understand the outcome and then explain it to others.”McKinsey: why businesses need explainable ai and how to deliver it Experian’s Ascend Intelligence ServicesTM Acquire is a custom credit risk model development service that can better quantify risk, score more applicants, increase automation, and drive more profitable decisions. Find out more Confidently explain lending practices:Detailed, rigorous, and transparent documentation that has been proven to meet the strictest regulatory standards. Breaking Machine Learning (ML) out of the black box:Understand what contributed most to a decision and generate adverse action codes directly from the model through our patent-pending ML explainability.References: “The executive’s AI playbook,” McKinsey.com. (See “Banking,” under “Value & Assess.”) In a study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Experian, we surveyed 660 and interviewed 60 decision makers for technology purchases that support the credit lifecycle at their financial services organisation. The study included businesses across North America, UK and Ireland, and Brazil. 2023_05_Forrester_AI-Decisioning-Platforms-Wave.pdf https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/why-businesses-need-explainable-ai-and-how-to-deliver-it Contributors:Masood Akhtar, Global Product Marketing Manager

As the lines between authentic and synthetic blur more than ever before, we explore four fraud trends likely to be influenced the most by GEN AI technology in 2024 and what businesses can do to prevent them.