Financial Services
This is an exciting time to work in big data analytics. Here at Experian, we have more than 2 petabytes of data in the United States alone. In the past few years, because of high data volume, more computing power and the availability of open-source code algorithms, my colleagues and I have watched excitedly as more and more companies are getting into machine learning. We’ve observed the growth of competition sites like Kaggle, open-source code sharing sites like GitHub and various machine learning (ML) data repositories. We’ve noticed that on Kaggle, two algorithms win over and over at supervised learning competitions: If the data is well-structured, teams that use Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) seem to win. For unstructured data, teams that use neural networks win pretty often. Modeling is both an art and a science. Those winning teams tend to be good at what the machine learning people call feature generation and what we credit scoring people called attribute generation. We have nearly 1,000 expert data scientists in more than 12 countries, many of whom are experts in traditional consumer risk models — techniques such as linear regression, logistic regression, survival analysis, CART (classification and regression trees) and CHAID analysis. So naturally I’ve thought about how GBM could apply in our world. Credit scoring is not quite like a machine learning contest. We have to be sure our decisions are fair and explainable and that any scoring algorithm will generalize to new customer populations and stay stable over time. Increasingly, clients are sending us their data to see what we could do with newer machine learning techniques. We combine their data with our bureau data and even third-party data, we use our world-class attributes and develop custom attributes, and we see what comes out. It’s fun — like getting paid to enter a Kaggle competition! For one financial institution, GBM armed with our patented attributes found a nearly 5 percent lift in KS when compared with traditional statistics. At Experian, we use Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) implementation of GBM that, out of the box, has regularization features we use to prevent overfitting. But it’s missing some features that we and our clients count on in risk scoring. Our Experian DataLabs team worked with our Decision Analytics team to figure out how to make it work in the real world. We found answers for a couple of important issues: Monotonicity — Risk managers count on the ability to impose what we call monotonicity. In application scoring, applications with better attribute values should score as lower risk than applications with worse values. For example, if consumer Adrienne has fewer delinquent accounts on her credit report than consumer Bill, all other things being equal, Adrienne’s machine learning score should indicate lower risk than Bill’s score. Explainability — We were able to adapt a fairly standard “Adverse Action” methodology from logistic regression to work with GBM. There has been enough enthusiasm around our results that we’ve just turned it into a standard benchmarking service. We help clients appreciate the potential for these new machine learning algorithms by evaluating them on their own data. Over time, the acceptance and use of machine learning techniques will become commonplace among model developers as well as internal validation groups and regulators. Whether you’re a data scientist looking for a cool place to work or a risk manager who wants help evaluating the latest techniques, check out our weekly data science video chats and podcasts.
How a business prices its products is a dynamic process that drives customer satisfaction and loyalty, as well as business success. In the digital age, pricing is becoming even more complex. For example, companies like Amazon may revise the price of a hot item several times per day. Dynamic pricing models for consumer financial products can be especially difficult for at least four reasons: A complex regulatory environment. Fair lending concerns. The potential for adverse selection by risky consumers and fraudsters. The direct impact the affordability of a loan may have on both the consumer’s ability to pay it and the likelihood that it will be prepaid. If a lender offered the same interest rate and terms to every customer for the same loan product, low-risk customers would secure better rates elsewhere, and high-risk customers would not. The end result? Only the higher-risk customers would select the product, which would increase losses and reduce profitability. For this reason, the lending industry has established risk-based pricing. This pricing method addresses the above issue, since customers with different risk profiles are offered different rates. But it’s limited. More advanced lenders also understand the price elasticity of customer demand, because there are diverse reasons why customers decide to take up differently priced loans. Customers have different needs and risk profiles, so they react to a loan offer in different ways. Many factors determine a customer’s propensity to take up an offer — for example, the competitive environment and availability of other lenders, how time-critical the decision is, and the loan terms offered. Understanding the customer’s price elasticity allows a business to offer the ideal price to each customer to maximize profitability. Pricing optimization is the superior method assuming the lender has a scientific, data-driven approach to predicting how different customers will respond to different prices. Optimization allows an organization to determine the best offer for each customer to meet business objectives while adhering to financial and operational constraints such as volume, margin and credit risk. The business can access trade-offs between competing objectives, such as maximizing revenue and maximizing volume, and determine the optimal decision to be made for each individual customer to best meet both objectives. In the table below, you can see five benefits lenders realize when they improve their pricing segmentation with an optimization strategy. Interested in learning more about pricing optimization? Click here to download our full white paper, Price optimization in retail consumer lending.
Unsecured lending is increasing. And everyone wants in. Not only are the number of personal loans increasing, but the share of those loans originated by fintech companies is increasing. According to Experian statistics, in August 2015, 890 new trades were originated by fintechs (or 21% of all personal loans). Two years later, in August 2017, 1.1 million trades belonged to fintechs (making up 36% of trades). This increase is consistent over time even though the spread of average loan amount between traditional loans and fintech is tightening. While convenience and the ability to apply online are key, interest rates are the number one factor in choosing a lender. Although average interest rates for traditional loans have stabilized, fintech interest rates continue to shift higher – and yet, the upward momentum in fintech loan origination continues. So, who are the consumers taking these loans? A common misconception about fintechs is that their association with market disruption, innovation and technology means that they appeal vastly to the Millennial masses. But that’s not necessarily the case. Boomers represent the second largest group utilizing fintech Marketplace loans and, interestingly, Boomers’ average loan amount is higher than any other generational group – 85.9% higher, in fact, from their Millennial counterparts. The reality is the personal loan market is fast-paced and consumers across the generational spectrum appear eager to adopt convenience-based, technology-driven online lending methods – something to the tune of $35.7 million in trades. For more lending insights and statistics, download Experian’s Q2 2018 Personal Loans Infographic here. Learn More About Online Marketplace Lending Download Lending Insights
If your company is like many financial institutions, it’s likely the discussion around big data and financial analytics has been an ongoing conversation. For many financial institutions, data isn’t the problem, but rather what could or should be done with it. Research has shown that only about 30% of financial institutions are successfully leveraging their data to generate actionable insights, and customers are noticing. According to a recent study from Capgemini, 30% of US customers and 26% of UK customers feel like their financial institutions understand their needs. No matter how much data you have, it’s essentially just ones and zeroes if you’re not using it. So how do banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions who capture and consume vast amounts of data use that data to innovate, improve the customer experience and stay competitive? The answer, you could say, is written in the sand. The most forward-thinking financial institutions are turning to analytical environments, also known as a sandbox, to solve the business problem of big data. Like the name suggests, a sandbox is an environment that contains all the materials and tools one might need to create, build, and collaborate around their data. A sandbox gives data-savvy banks, credit unions and FinTechs access to depersonalized credit data from across the country. Using custom dashboards and data visualization tools, they can manipulate the data with predictive models for different micro and macro-level scenarios. The added value of a sandbox is that it becomes a one-stop shop data tool for the entire enterprise. This saves the time normally required in the back and forth of acquiring data for a specific to a project or particular data sets. The best systems utilize the latest open source technology in artificial intelligence and machine learning to deliver intelligence that can inform regional trends, consumer insights and highlight market opportunities. From industry benchmarking to market entry and expansion research and campaign performance to vintage analysis, reject inferencing and much more. An analytical sandbox gives you the data to create actionable analytics and insights across the enterprise right when you need it, not months later. The result is the ability to empower your customers to make financial decisions when, where and how they want. Keeping them happy keeps your financial institution relevant and competitive. Isn’t it time to put your data to work for you? Learn more about how Experian can solve your big data problems. >> Interested to see a live demo of the Ascend Sandbox? Register today for our webinar “Big Data Can Lead to Even Bigger ROI with the Ascend Sandbox.”
With Hispanic Heritage Awareness Month underway and strategic planning season in full swing, the topic of growing membership continues to take front stage for credit unions. Miriam De Dios Woodward (CEO of Coopera Consulting) is an expert on the Hispanic opportunity, working with credit unions to help them grow by expanding the communities they serve. I asked Miriam if she could provide her considerations for credit unions looking to further differentiate their offerings and service levels in 2019 and beyond. There’s never been a better time for credit unions to start (or grow) Hispanic engagement as a differentiation strategy. Lending deeper to this community is one key way to do just that. Financial institutions that don’t will find it increasingly difficult to grow their membership, deposits and loan balances. As you begin your 2019 strategic planning discussions, consider how your credit union could make serving the Hispanic market a differentiation strategy. Below are nine ways to start. 1. Understand your current membership and market through segmentation and analytics. The first step in reaching Hispanics in your community is understanding who they are and what they need. Segment your existing membership and market to determine how many are Hispanic, as well as their language preferences. Use this segmentation to set a baseline for growth of your Hispanic growth strategy, measure ongoing progress and develop new marketing and product strategies. If you don’t have the bandwidth and resources to conduct this segmentation in-house, seek partners to help. 2. Determine the product gaps that exist and where you can deepen relationships. After you understand your current Hispanic membership and market, you will want to identify opportunities to improve the member experience, including your lending program. For example, if you notice Hispanics are not obtaining mortgages at the same rate as non-Hispanics, look at ways to bridge the gaps and address the root causes (i.e., more first-time homebuyer education and more collaboration with culturally relevant providers across the homebuying experience). Also, consider how you might adapt personal loans to meet the needs of consumers, such as paying for immigration expenses or emergencies with family in Latin America. 3. Explore alternative credit scoring models. Many credit products accessible to underserved consumers feature one-size-fits-all rates and fees, which means they aren’t priced according to risk. Just because a consumer is unscoreable by most traditional credit scoring models doesn’t mean he or she won’t be able to pay back a loan or does not have a payment history. Several alternative models available today can help lenders better evaluate a consumer’s ability to repay. Alternative sources of consumer data, such as utility records, cell phone payments, medical payments, insurance payments, remittance receipts, direct deposit histories and more, can be used to build better risk models. Armed with this information – and with the proper programs in place to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and privacy laws – credit unions can continue making responsible lending decisions and grow their portfolio while better serving the underserved. 4. Consider how you can help more Hispanic members realize their desire to become homeowners. In 2017, more than 167,000 Hispanics purchased a first home, taking the total number of Hispanic homeowners to nearly 7.5 million (46.2 percent of Hispanic households). Hispanics are the only demographic to have increased their rate of homeownership for the last three consecutive years. What’s more, 9 percent of Hispanics are planning to buy a house in the next 12 months, compared to 6 percent of non-Hispanics. This means Hispanics, who represent about 18 percent of the U.S. population, may represent 22 percent of all new home buyers in the next year. By offering a variety of home loan options supported by culturally relevant education, credit unions can help more Hispanics realize the dream of homeownership. 5. Go beyond indirect lending for auto loans. The number of cars purchased by Hispanics in the U.S. is projected to double in the period between 2010 and 2020. It’s estimated that new car sales to Hispanics will grow by 8 percent over the next five years, compared to a 2 percent decline among the total market. Consider connecting with local car dealers that serve the Hispanic market. Build a pre-car buying relationship with members rather than waiting until after they’ve made their decision. Connect with them after they’ve made the purchase, as well. 6. Consider how you can help Hispanic entrepreneurs and small business owners. Hispanics are nine times more likely than whites to take out a small business loan in the next five years. Invest in products and resources to help Hispanic entrepreneurs, such as small business-friendly loans, microloans, Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) loans, credit-building loans and small-business financial education. Also, consider partnering with organizations that offer small business assistance, such as local Hispanic chambers of commerce and small business incubators. 7. Rethink your credit card offerings. Credit card spending among underserved consumers has grown rapidly for several consecutive years. The Center for Financial Services Innovation (CFSI) estimates underserved consumers will spend $37.6 billion on retail credit cards, $8.3 billion on subprime credit cards and $0.4 billion on secured credit cards in 2018. Consider mapping out a strategy to evolve your credit card offerings in a way most likely to benefit the unique underserved populations in your market. Finding success with a credit-builder product like a secured card isn’t a quick fix. Issuers must take the necessary steps to comply with several regulations, including Ability to Repay rules. Cards and marketing teams will need to collaborate closely to execute sales, communication and, importantly, cardmember education plans. There must also be a good program in place for graduating cardmembers into appropriate products as their improving credit profiles warrant. If offering rewards-based products, ensure the rewards include culturally relevant offerings. Work with your credit card providers. 8. Don’t forget about lines of credit. Traditional credit lines are often overlooked as product offerings for Hispanic consumers. These products can provide flexible funding opportunities for a variety of uses such as making home improvements, helping family abroad with emergencies, preparing families for kids entering college and other expenses. Members who are homeowners and have equity in their homes have a potential untapped source to borrow cash. 9. Get innovative. Hispanic consumers are twice as likely to research financial products and services using mobile apps. Many fintech companies have developed apps to help Hispanics meet immediate financial needs, such as paying off debt and saving for short-term goals. Others encourage long-term financial planning. Still other startups have developed new plans that are basically mini-loans shoppers can take out for specific purchases when checking out at stores and online sites that participate. Consider how your credit union might partner with innovative fintech companies like these to offer relevant, digital financial services to Hispanics in your community. Next Steps Although there’s more to a robust Hispanic outreach program than we can fit in one article, credit unions that bring the nine topics highlighted above to their 2019 strategic planning sessions will be in an outstanding position to differentiate themselves through Hispanic engagement. Experian is proud to be the only credit bureau with a team 100% dedicated to the Credit Union movement and sharing industry best practices from experts like Miriam De Dios Woodward. Our continued focus is providing solutions that enable credit unions to continue to grow, protect and serve their field of membership. We can provide a more complete view of members and potential members credit behavior with alternative credit data. By pulling in new data sources that include alternative financing, utility and rental payments, Experian provides credit unions a more holistic picture, helping to improve credit access and decisioning for millions of consumers who may otherwise be overlooked. About Miriam De Dios Woodward Miriam De Dios Woodward is the CEO of Coopera, a strategy consulting firm that helps credit unions and other organizations reach and serve the Hispanic market as an opportunity for growth and financial inclusion. She was named a 2016 Woman to Watch by Credit Union Times and 2015 Latino Business Person of the Year by the League of United Latin American Citizens of Iowa. Miriam earned her bachelor’s degree from Iowa State University, her MBA from the University of Iowa and is a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Leading Change and Organizational Renewal executive program.
Last Updated: January 2019 Traditional credit data has long been the end-all-be-all ruling the financial services space. Like the staple black suit or that little black dress in your closet, it’s been the quintessential go-to for decades. Sure, the financial industry has some seasonality, but traditional credit data has reigned supreme as the reliable pillar. It’s dependable. And for a long time, it’s all there was to the equation. But as with finance, fashion and all things – evolution has occurred. Specifically, how consumers are managing their money has evolved, which calls for deeper insights that are still defensible and disputable. Alternative credit data is the new black. Alternative credit data is increasingly integrated in credit talks for lenders across the country. Much like that LBD, it is becoming a lending staple – that closet (or portfolio) must-have – to leverage for better decisioning when determining credit worthiness. So, what is alternative credit data? In our data-driven industry, “alternative” data as a whole may best be summed up as FCRA-compliant credit data that is not typically included in traditional credit reports. For traditional data, think loan and inquiry data on bankcards, auto, mortgage and personal loans; typically trades with a term of 12 months or greater. Some examples of alternative credit data include alternative financial services data, rental data, full-file public records and account aggregation. These insights can ultimately improve credit access and decisioning for millions of consumers who may otherwise be overlooked. Alternative or not, every bit of information counts – and consumers are willing to share this data. An Experian survey revealed that 70% of consumers are willing to provide additional financial information to a lender if it increases their chance for approval or improves their interest rate for a mortgage or car loan. In addition, the data also revealed that 71% of lenders believe consumers will increasingly allow access to their data for lending decisions if they are empowered to turn it on and off. FCRA-compliant, user permissioned data allows lenders to easily verify assets and income electronically without consumer permission, thereby giving lenders more confidence in their decision and allowing consumers to gain access to lower-cost financing. From a risk management perspective, alternative credit data can also help identify riskier consumers, by identifying information like the number of payday loans acquired within a year, number of first-payment defaults, number of inquiries within the past 30-90 days and overall stability of an applicant. Alternative credit data can give supplemental insight into a consumer’s stability, ability and willingness to repay that is not available on a traditional credit report that can help lenders avoid risk or price accordingly. From closet finds that refresh your look to that LBD, alternative credit data gives lenders more transparency into their consumers, and gives consumers seeking credit a greater foundation to help their case for creditworthiness. It really is this season’s – and every season’s – must-have. Get Started Today
Machine learning (ML), the newest buzzword, has swept into the lexicon and captured the interest of us all. Its recent, widespread popularity has stemmed mainly from the consumer perspective. Whether it’s virtual assistants, self-driving cars or romantic matchmaking, ML has rapidly positioned itself into the mainstream. Though ML may appear to be a new technology, its use in commercial applications has been around for some time. In fact, many of the data scientists and statisticians at Experian are considered pioneers in the field of ML, going back decades. Our team has developed numerous products and processes leveraging ML, from our world-class consumer fraud and ID protection to producing credit data products like our Trended 3DTM attributes. In fact, we were just highlighted in the Wall Street Journal for how we’re using machine learning to improve our internal IT performance. ML’s ability to consume vast amounts of data to uncover patterns and deliver results that are not humanly possible otherwise is what makes it unique and applicable to so many fields. This predictive power has now sparked interest in the credit risk industry. Unlike fraud detection, where ML is well-established and used extensively, credit risk modeling has until recently taken a cautionary approach to adopting newer ML algorithms. Because of regulatory scrutiny and perceived lack of transparency, ML hasn’t experienced the broad acceptance as some of credit risk modeling’s more utilized applications. When it comes to credit risk models, delivering the most predictive score is not the only consideration for a model’s viability. Modelers must be able to explain and detail the model’s logic, or its “thought process,” for calculating the final score. This means taking steps to ensure the model’s compliance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, which forbids discriminatory lending practices. Federal laws also require adverse action responses to be sent by the lender if a consumer’s credit application has been declined. This requires the model must be able to highlight the top reasons for a less than optimal score. And so, while ML may be able to deliver the best predictive accuracy, its ability to explain how the results are generated has always been a concern. ML has been stigmatized as a “black box,” where data mysteriously gets transformed into the final predictions without a clear explanation of how. However, this is changing. Depending on the ML algorithm applied to credit risk modeling, we’ve found risk models can offer the same transparency as more traditional methods such as logistic regression. For example, gradient boosting machines (GBMs) are designed as a predictive model built from a sequence of several decision tree submodels. The very nature of GBMs’ decision tree design allows statisticians to explain the logic behind the model’s predictive behavior. We believe model governance teams and regulators in the United States may become comfortable with this approach more quickly than with deep learning or neural network algorithms. Since GBMs are represented as sets of decision trees that can be explained, while neural networks are represented as long sets of cryptic numbers that are much harder to document, manage and understand. In future blog posts, we’ll discuss the GBM algorithm in more detail and how we’re using its predictability and transparency to maximize credit risk decisioning for our clients.
The August 2018 LinkedIn Workforce Report states some interesting facts about data science and the current workforce in the United States. Demand for data scientists is off the charts, but there is a data science skills shortage in almost every U.S. city — particularly in the New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles areas. Nationally, there is a shortage of more than 150,000 people with data science skills. One way companies in financial services and other industries have coped with the skills gap in analytics is by using outside vendors. A 2017 Dun & Bradstreet and Forbes survey reported that 27 percent of respondents cited a skills gap as a major obstacle to their data and analytics efforts. Outsourcing data science work makes it easier to scale up and scale down as needs arise. But surprisingly, more than half of respondents said the third-party work was superior to their in-house analytics. At Experian, we have participated in quite a few outsourced analytics projects. Here are a few of the lessons we’ve learned along the way: Manage expectations: Everyone has their own management style, but to be successful, you must be proactively involved in managing the partnership with your provider. Doing so will keep them aligned with your objectives and prevent quality degradation or cost increases as you become more tied to them. Communication: Creating open and honest communication between executive management and your resource partner is key. You need to be able to discuss what is working well and what isn’t. This will help to ensure your partner has a thorough understanding of your goals and objectives and will properly manage any bumps in the road. Help external resources feel like a part of the team: When you’re working with external resources, either offshore or onshore, they are typically in an alternate location. This can make them feel like they aren’t a part of the team and therefore not directly tied to the business goals of the project. To help bridge the gap, performing regular status meetings via video conference can help everyone feel like a part of the team. Within these meetings, providing information on the goals and objectives of the project is key. This way, they can hear the message directly from you, which will make them feel more involved and provide a clear understanding of what they need to do to be successful. Being able to put faces to names, as well as having direct communication with you, will help external employees feel included. Drive engagement through recognition programs: Research has shown that employees are more engaged in their work when they receive recognition for their efforts. While you may not be able to provide a monetary award, recognition is still a big driver for engagement. It can be as simple as recognizing a job well done during your video conference meetings, providing certificates of excellence or sending a simple thank-you card to those who are performing well. Either way, taking the extra time to make your external workforce feel appreciated will produce engaged resources that will help drive your business goals forward. Industry training: Your external resources may have the necessary skills needed to perform the job successfully, but they may not have specific industry knowledge geared towards your business. Work with your partner to determine where they have expertise and where you can work together to providing training. Ensure your external workforce will have a solid understanding of the business line they will be supporting. If you’ve decided to augment your staff for your next big project, Experian® can help. Our Analytics on DemandTM service provides senior-level analysts, either onshore or offshore, who can help with analytical data science and modeling work for your organization.
Federal legislation makes verifying an individual’s identity by scanning identity documents during onboarding legal in all 50 states Originally posted on Mitek blog The Making Online Banking Initiation Legal and Easy (MOBILE) Act officially became law on May 24, 2018, authorizing a national standard for banks to scan and retain information from driver’s licenses and identity cards as part of a customer online onboarding process, via smartphone or website. This bill, which was proposed in 2017 with bipartisan support, allows financial institutions to fully deploy mobile technology that can make digital account openings across all states seamless and cost efficient. The MOBILE Act also stipulates that the digital image would be destroyed after account opening to further ensure customer data security. As an additional security measure, section 213 of the act mandates an update to the system to confirm matches of names to social security numbers. “The additional security this process could add for online account origination was a key selling point with the Equifax data breach fresh on everyone’s minds,” Scott Sargent, of counsel in the law firm Baker Donelson’s financial service practice, recently commented on AmericanBanker.com. Read the full article here. Though digital banking and an online onboarding process has already been a best practice for financial institutions in recent years, the MOBILE Act officially overrules any potential state legislation that, up to this point, has not recognized digital images of identity documents as valid. The MOBILE Act states: “This bill authorizes a financial institution to record personal information from a scan, copy, or image of an individual’s driver’s license or personal identification card and store the information electronically when an individual initiates an online request to open an account or obtain a financial product. The financial institution may use the information for the purpose of verifying the authenticity of the driver’s license or identification card, verifying the identity of the individual, or complying with legal requirements.” Why adopt online banking? The recently passed MOBILE Act is a boon for both financial institutions and end users. The legislation: Enables and encourages financial institutions to meet their digital transformation goals Makes the process safe with digital ID verification capabilities and other security measures Reduces time, manual Know Your Customer (KYC) duties and costs to financial institutions for onboarding new customers Provides the convenient, on-demand experience that customers want and expect The facts: 61% of people use their mobile phone to carry out banking activity.1 77% of Americans have smartphones.2 50 million consumers who are unbanked or underbanked use smartphones.3 The MOBILE Act doesn’t require any regulatory implementation. Banks can access this real-time electronic process directly or through vendors. Read all you need to know about the MOBILE Act here. Find out more about a better way to manage fraud and identity services. References 1Mobile Ecosystem Forum, MEF Mobile Money Report (https://mobileecosystemforum.com/mobile-money-report/), Feb. 5, 2018. 2Pew Research Center, Mobile Fact Sheet (http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/), Jan. 30, 2017. 3The Federal Reserve System, Consumers and Mobile Financial Services 2015 (https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/consumers-and-mobile-financial-services-report-201503.pdf), March 2015.
Millennials have been accused of “killing” a lot of things. From napkins and fabric softener to cable and golf, the generation which makes up the largest population of the United States (aka Gen Y) is cutting a lot of cords. Despite homeowning being listed as one of the notorious generational group’s casualties, it’s one area that millennials want to keep alive, according to recent statistics. In fact, a new Experian study revealed 86% of millennials believe that buying a house is a good financial investment. However, only 15% have a mortgage today. One explanation for this gap may be that they appear too risky. Younger millennials (age 22-28) have an average near prime score of 652 and older millennials (age 29-35) have a prime score of 665. Both subsets fall below the average VantageScore® of U.S. consumers – 677. Yes, with the majority of millennials having near prime or worse credit scores, we can agree that they will need need to improve their financial hygiene to improve their overall credit rankings. But their dreams of homeownership have not yet been dashed. Seemingly high aspirations (of homeownership), disrupted by a reality of limited assets, low scores, and thin credit files, create a disconnect that suggests a lack of resources to get into their first homes – rather than a lack of interest. Or, maybe not. Maybe, after surviving a few first-time credit benders that followed soon after opening the floodgates to credit, millennials feel like the combination of low scores and the inability to get any credit is only salt in their wounds from their lending growing pains. Or maybe it’s all the student loans. Or maybe it’s the fact that so many of them are underemployed. But maybe there’s still more to the story. This emerging generation is known for having high expectations for change and better frictionless experiences in all areas of their life. It turns out, their borrowing behavior is no different. Recent research by Experian reveals consumers who use alternative financial services (AFS) are 11 years younger on average than those that do not. What’s the attraction? Financial technology companies have contributed to the explosive growth of AFS lenders and millennials are attracted to those online interactions. The problem is many of these trades are alternative finance products and are not reported to traditional credit bureaus. This means they do nothing to build credit experience in the eyes of traditional lenders and millennials with good credit history find it difficult to get access to credit well into their 20s. Alternative credit data provides a deeper dive into consumers, revealing their transactions and ability to pay as evidenced by alternative finance data, rental, utility and telecom payments. Alt data may make some millennials more favorable to lenders by revealing that their three-digit credit score (or lack there of) may not be indicative of their financial stability. By incorporating alternative financial services data (think convenient, tech-forward lenders that check all the boxes for bank removed millennials, not just payday loan recipients), credit-challenged millennials have a chance at earning recognition for their experience with alternative financial services that may help them get their first mortgage. Society may have preconceived notions about millennials, but lenders may want to consider giving them a second look when it comes to determining creditworthiness. In a national Experian survey, 53% of consumers said they believe some of these alternative sources would have a positive effect on their credit score. We all grow up sometime and as our needs change, there may come a day when millennials need more traditional financial services. Lenders who take a traditional view of risk may miss out on opportunities that alternative credit data brings to light. As lending continues to evolve, combining both traditional credit scores and alternative credit data appears to offer a potentially sweet (or rather, home sweet home) solution for you and your customers. VantageScore Calculated on the VantageScore 3.0 model. Your VantageScore 3.0 from Experian indicates your credit risk level and is not used by all lenders, so don\'t be surprised if your lender uses a score that\'s different from your VantageScore 3.0.
Consumer confidence is nearing an 18-year high. Unemployment figures are at record lows. Retail spend is healthy, and expected to stay that way through the back-to-school and holiday shopping booms. Translation for credit card issuers? The swiping and spending continue. In fact, credit card openings were up 4% in the first quarter of 2018 compared to the same time last year, and card utilization is hovering around 20.5%. Even with the Fed’s gradual 2018 rate hikes, consumers are shopping. In a new Mintel report, outstanding credit card debt is now $1.03 trillion (as of the end of Q1, 2018), and the number of consumers with credit cards is growing fastest among people aged 18 to 34. In the retail card arena specifically, boomers and Gen X’ers are leading the charge, opening 45% and 27% of new retails cards, respectively. “A stronger economy always bodes well for credit cards,” said Kelley Motley, director of analytics for Experian. “Now is the time for card issuers to zero in on their most loyal consumers and ensure they are treating them with the right offers, rewards and premium benefits.” Consumer data reveals the top incentives when selecting a rewards-based card includes cash back, gas rewards and retail cards (including travel rewards and airfare). In fact, for younger consumers, offering rewards has proven to be the most effective way to get them to switch from debit to credit cards. Cash back was the most preferred reward for consumers aged 18 to 44 when asked about their motivation to apply for a new card. For individuals 45 and older, 0% interest was the top motivator. Of course, beyond credit card opens, the ideal is to engage with the consumers who are utilizing the card the most. From a segmentation standpoint, the loyal retail cardholder has an average VantageScore® of 671 with an average total balance of $1,633. They use the card regularly and consistently make payments. Finding more loyalists is the goal and can be achieved with informed segmentation insights and targeted prescreen campaigns. On the flip side, insights can inform card issuers with data, helping them to avoid wasting marketing dollars on consumers who merely want to game a quick credit card offer and then close an account. A batch and blast marketing approach no longer works in the credit card marketing game. “Consumers expect you to know them and their financial needs,” said Paul DeSaulniers, senior director of Experian’s segmentation solutions. “The data exists and tells you exactly who to target and how to structure the offer – you just need to execute.”
Lower income-earners, which make up 60% of Americans, are the vehicle driving the U.S.’s booming economy. While the top 40% of earners usually direct U.S. consumption growth, “2016-2017 was the first two-year span in at least two decades that the bottom 60% accounted for the majority,” according to a recent study by Reuters. The trend continued in the first quarter of 2018. As wages remain flat and borrowing costs increase, some economists worry that this majority may contribute to increased credit card delinquency should the economy become less favorable; however, statistics suggest otherwise. According to an Experian study on lower income consumers, low income does not mean low credit scores. 67% of lower income consumers (defined as those with income totaling less than $35,000 per year) have access to credit, with 39% holding prime scores and 21% holding near prime scores. Some analysts have brought attention to recent spikes in credit card delinquencies and charge-off rates at smaller commercial banks during the first quarter. However, when combined with the largest 100 commercial banks, the national credit card delinquency rate in Q1 was 2.48%, which is lower than 15-year averages. Consumers with lower credit scores, including those who are also lower income, are looking to build creditworthiness, according to data collected during an Experian-sponsored credit card survey last year. This suggests there is a need for lenders who meet the needs of consumers of all kinds, spanning from first-time lenders to long-time credit-holders, regardless of income. Successful acquisitions begin with powerful growth strategies during prospecting. By watching where the majority of spending is taking place, or rather who is conducting that spending, new opportunities are apparent. Effective prospecting tools can help you optimize your channel mix and clearly identify credit worthy consumers. These items assist in determining the right start for your acquisition process, and deliver better program results.
Customer Identification Program (CIP) solution through CrossCore® Every day, I work closely with clients to reduce the negative side effects of fraud prevention. I hear the need for lower false-positive rates; maximum fraud detection in populations; and simple, streamlined verification processes. Lately, more conversations have turned toward ID verification needs for Customer Information Program (CIP) administration. As it turns out, barriers to growth, high customer friction and high costs dominate the CIP landscape. While the marketplace struggles to manage the impact of fraud prevention, CIP routinely disrupts more than 10 percent of new customer acquisitions. Internally at Experian, we talk about this as the biggest ID problem our customers aren’t solving. Think about this: The fight for business in the CIP space quickly turned to price, and price was defined by unit cost. But what’s the real cost? One of the dominant CIP solutions uses a series of hyperlinks to connect identity data. Every click is a new charge. Their website invites users to dig into the data — manually. Users keep digging, and they keep paying. And the challenges don’t stop there. Consider the data sources used for these solutions. The winners of the price fight built CIP solutions around credit bureau header data. What does that do for growth? If the identity wasn’t sufficiently verified when a credit report was pulled, does it make sense to go back to the same data source? Keep digging. Cha-ching, cha-ching. Right about now, you might be feeling like there’s some sleight of hand going on. The true cost of CIP administration is much more than a single unit price. It’s many units, manual effort, recycled data and frustrated customers — and it impacts far more clients than fraud prevention. CIP needs have moved far beyond the demand for a low-cost solution. We’re thrilled to be leading the move toward more robust data and decision capabilities to CIP through CrossCore®. With its open architecture and flexible decision structure, our CrossCore platform enables access to a diverse and robust set of data sources to meet these needs. CrossCore unites Experian data, client data and a growing list of available partner data to deliver an intelligent and cost-conscious approach to managing fraud and identity challenges. The next step will unify CIP administration, fraud analytics and a range of verification treatment options together on the CrossCore platform as well. Spoiler alert. We’ve already taken that step.
As more financial institutions express interest and leverage alternative credit data sources to decision and assess consumers, lenders want to be assured of how they can best utilize this data source and maintain compliance. Experian recently interviewed Philip Bohi, Vice President for Compliance Education for the American Financial Services Association (AFSA), to learn more about his perspective on this topic, as well as to gain insights on what lenders should consider as they dive into the world of alternative credit data. Alternative data continues to be a hot topic in the financial services space. How have you seen it evolve over the past few years? It’s hard to pinpoint where it began, but it has been interesting to observe how technology firms and people have changed our perceptions of the value and use of data in recent years. Earlier, a company’s data was just the information needed to conduct business. It seems like people are waking up to the realization that their business data can be useful internally, as well as to others. And we have come to understand how previously disregarded data can be profoundly valuable. These insights provide a lot of new opportunities, but also new questions. I would also say that the scope of alternative credit data use has changed. A few years ago, alternative credit data was a tool to largely address the thin- and no-file consumer. More recently, we’ve seen it can provide a lift across the credit spectrum. We recently conducted a survey with lenders and 23% of respondents cited “complying with laws and regulations” as the top barrier to utilizing alternative data. Why do you think this is the case? What are the top concerns you hear from lenders as it relates to compliance on this topic? The consumer finance industry is very focused on compliance, because failure to maintain compliance can kill a business, either directly through fines and expenses, or through reputation damage. Concerns about alternative data come from a lack of familiarity. There is uncertainty about acquiring the data, using the data, safeguarding the data, selling the data, etc. Companies want to feel confident that they know where the limits are in creating, acquiring, using, storing and selling data. Alternative data is a broad term. When it comes to utilizing it for making a credit decision, what types of alternative data can actually be used? Currently the scope is somewhat limited. I would describe the alternative data elements as being analogous to traditional credit data. Alternative data includes rent payments, utility payments, cell phone payments, bank deposits, and similar records. These provide important insights into whether a given consumer is keeping up with financial obligations. And most importantly, we are seeing that the particular types of obligations reflected in alternative data reflect the spending habits of people whose traditional credit files are thin or non-existent. This is a good thing, as alternative data captures consumers who are paying their bills consistently earlier than traditional data does. Serving those customers is a great opportunity. If a lender wants to begin utilizing alternative credit data, what must they know from a compliance standpoint? I would begin with considering what the lender’s goal is and letting that guide how it will explore using alternative data. For some companies, accessing credit scores that include some degree of alternative data along with traditional data elements is enough. Just doing that provides a good business benefit without introducing a lot of additional risk as compared to using traditional credit score information. If the company wants to start leveraging its own customer data for its own purposes, or making it available to third parties, that becomes complex very quickly. A company can find itself subject to all the regulatory burdens of a credit-reporting agency very quickly. In any case, the entire lifecycle of the data has to be considered, along with how the data will be protected when the data is “at rest,” “in use,” or “in transit.” Alternative data used for credit assessment should additionally be FCRA-compliant. How do you see alternative credit data evolving in the future? I cannot predict where it will go, but the unfettered potential is dizzying. Think about how DNA-based genealogy has taken off, telling folks they have family members they did not know and providing information to solve old crimes. I think we need to carefully balance personal privacy and prudent uses of customer data. There is also another issue with wide-ranging uses of new data. I contend it takes time to discern whether an element of data is accurately predictive. Consider for a moment a person’s utility bills. If electricity usage in a household goes down when the bills in the neighborhood are going up, what does that tell us? Does it mean the family is under some financial strain and using the air conditioning less? Or does it tell us they had solar panels installed? Or they’ve been on vacation? Figuring out what a particular piece of data means about someone’s circumstances can be difficult. About Philip Bohi Philip joined AFSA in 2017 as Vice President, Compliance Education. He is responsible for providing strategic direction and leadership for the Association’s compliance activities, including AFSA University, and is the staff liaison to the Operations and Regulatory Compliance Committee and Technology Task Forces. He brings significant consumer finance legal and compliance experience to AFSA, having served as in-house counsel at Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Fannie Mae. At those companies, Philip worked closely with compliance staff supporting technology projects, legislative tracking, and vendor management. His private practice included work on manufactured housing, residential mortgage compliance, and consumer finance matters at McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC and Lotstein Buckman, LLP. He is a member of the Virginia State Bar and the District of Columbia Bar. Learn more about the array of alternative credit data sources available to financial institutions.
As I mentioned in my previous blog, model validation is an essential step in evaluating a recently developed predictive model’s performance before finalizing and proceeding with implementation. An in-time validation sample is created to set aside a portion of the total model development sample so the predictive accuracy can be measured on a data sample not used to develop the model. However, if few records in the target performance group are available, splitting the total model development sample into the development and in-time validation samples will leave too few records in the target group for use during model development. An alternative approach to generating a validation sample is to use a resampling technique. There are many different types and variations of resampling methods. This blog will address a few common techniques. Jackknife technique — An iterative process whereby an observation is removed from each subsequent sample generation. So if there are N number of observations in the data, jackknifing calculates the model estimates on N - 1 different samples, with each sample having N - 1 observations. The model then is applied to each sample, and an average of the model predictions across all samples is derived to generate an overall measure of model performance and prediction accuracy. The jackknife technique can be broadened to a group of observations removed from each subsequent sample generation while giving equal opportunity for inclusion and exclusion to each observation in the data set. K-fold cross-validation — Generates multiple validation data sets from the holdout sample created for the model validation exercise, i.e., the holdout data is split into K subsets. The model then is applied to the K validation subsets, with each subset held out during the iterative process as the validation set while the model scores the remaining K-1 subsets. Again, an average of the predictions across the multiple validation samples is used to create an overall measure of model performance and prediction accuracy. Bootstrap technique — Generates subsets from the full model development data sample, with replacement, producing multiple samples generally of equal size. Thus, with a total sample size of N, this technique generates N random samples such that a single observation can be present in multiple subsets while another observation may not be present in any of the generated subsets. The generated samples are combined into a simulated larger data sample that then can be split into a development and an in-time, or holdout, validation sample. Before selecting a resampling technique, it’s important to check and verify data assumptions for each technique against the data sample selected for your model development, as some resampling techniques are more sensitive than others to violations of data assumptions. Learn more about how Experian Decision Analytics can help you with your custom model development.
Learn More Image
