Fintech
Fintech
The surge in digital demand over the past year reinforced the deep connection between recognition, fraud prevention and the online customer experience. As businesses transformed their operations to accommodate the rapidly growing volume of digital transactions, consumer expectations for easy, secure interactions increased at an even faster pace. That meant less tolerance for the interruptions caused by security and risk controls. We surveyed more than 9,000 consumers and 2,700 businesses worldwide about this connection for our 2021 Global Identity and Fraud Report. This year’s report dives into: Business priorities for the year ahead Why the digital customer experience remains siloed Consumer preferences that impact the digital customer journey Pandemic-era digital activities that have changed consumer expectations As we move forward into the rest of 2021 it’s crucial that businesses continue to focus on fraud prevention. In order to implement an effective fraud strategy that also makes it easier for customers to engage, businesses need to move away from a one-size-fits-all approach and focus on applying the right level of protection to each and every transaction. Download the report Review your fraud strategy
The sharp uptick in fraud that coincided with the digital evolution made it clear that banks, credit unions, and fintechs need to invest in a strategy that utilizes identity layers to keep their customers and their finances safe. The steady rise in fraud over the last several years spiked—payment fraud rose 70% last year and is expected to increase by 95% in 2021—making it more challenging than ever to address the fraud threat while meeting increasing customer expectations. The rising fraud threat 2020 saw a rapid influx of customers using digital channels and the amount of data flowing into financial systems. There’s been a seismic shift, and we’re not going back. According to a recent study, 80% of consumers now prefer to manage their finances digitally, leaving the door open for fraudsters to take advantage of digital newbies. The increase in online activity corresponded with criminal activity. The rates of synthetic identity, account opening, and account takeover fraud have risen as fraudsters’ tactics have evolved. 80% of fraud losses now come from synthetic identities In 2020 the rate of new account credit card fraud attempts rose 48% Account takeover accounted for 54% of all fraud attacks in 2020 Fraudsters will continue to take advantage of current conditions, moving from stimulus-related fraud back to more traditional forms of financial theft, and financial institutions must adapt in turn with robust identity layers. Resolving the identity threat In our recent white paper, developed in partnership with One World Identity, we explore how businesses can address the fraud threat. It requires a multilayered identity proofing strategy for both onboarding and ongoing authentication. By doing this, financial institutions can gain a holistic view of consumers and their associated risks, decreasing friction while enabling robust fraud protection. To learn more, download our “Improving Fraud by Increasing Identity Layers” white paper. Download white paper
For the last several months, Experian has participated as the only credit bureau in the pilot of the electronic Consent Based Social Security Number (SSN) Verification (eCBSV) service. As we move forward to general rollout and expanded availability later this year, it’s time to review the benefits of eCBSV and how it helps businesses prevent synthetic identity fraud. Service and program overview The eCBSV service combats synthetic identity fraud by comparing data provided electronically by approved financial institutions against the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) database in real time. This service helps financial institutions verify SSNs more efficiently and enables improved experiences for identifying legitimate or possibly synthetic identities applying for your products. The verification process begins with consent from the SSN holder – and with eCBSV this consent is provided electronically rather than via a wet signature. Then, the SSN is checked against the SSA database to validate the SSN, name, and date of birth combination are or are not a match. The verification will also indicate if the SSN is listed as deceased with the SSA. Together, these factors can help flag whether or not an identity is synthetic. By managing this process electronically, it is faster, more secure, and more efficient than before, offering an improved experience for consumers and the financial institutions that service them. Layering solutions While eCBSV is an excellent step forward in the fight against the rising threat of synthetic identity fraud, a layered fraud mitigation strategy is still necessary. It’s only by layering solutions that financial institutions can accurately identify different types of fraud and provide them with the correct treatment, which is especially important when it comes to rooting out fraud when it’s already embedded in a portfolio. To learn more about how Experian is helping to combat synthetic identity fraud and how eCBSV can benefit your financial institution, request a call. Request a call
Preventing fraud losses requires an understanding of each individual fraud type—including third-party, first-party, synthetic identity, and account takeover fraud—and how they differ from one another. It’s only with a multi-layered fraud strategy that businesses can adequately detect and treat each type of fraud while maintaining the customer experience. When’s the last time you reviewed your existing fraud strategy? Download infographic Review your fraud strategy
Experian is proud to announce, for the second year in a row, we have been named to the global Fintech Leaders list, placing in the top 20 for 2021. The list and adjoining report are released annually by international research organization, the Center for Financial Professionals (CeFPro). In addition to placing 19th on the list, Experian also placed in the Credit Risk category. The Center for Financial Professionals’ Fintech Leaders 2021 Report is one of the most rigorous programs that rank fintech industry leaders. The report’s coverage includes evaluating top fintech companies, solution providers, and vendors. The results are usually based on gathered surveys from end-users, practitioners, and subject matter experts. CeFPro’s report comes from the group’s market analysis and original research, which are backed by an advisory board that consists of 60 international industry professionals. Andreas Simou, CeFPro’s Managing Director, shared that the CeFPro board and voting members recognized Experian within the fintech survey as leaders for their data, decisioning and analytical capabilities. Simou said, \"Experian cements its place on the Fintech Leaders List, and has once again been very highly regarded, as a leading player within credit risk, most notably for their subject-matter expertise and excelling within the areas of data management and modelling,” he said. “We are honored to once again be recognized as a Fintech Leader by CeFPro and the global Fintech marketplace,” said Jon Bailey, Vice President for Fintech at Experian. “We are committed to supporting the Fintech community and we will continue to invest and innovate to help our clients solve problems, create opportunities, and promote financial inclusion,” Bailey said.
Since 2002, lenders have been aware of the importance of Know Your Customer (KYC) and the associated Customer Identification Program (CIP) requirements. As COVID-19 has changed procedures and priorities for businesses and consumers across the board, it’s more important than ever for institutions to ensure their CIP process includes ongoing monitoring of identity risk. What is CIP? Standard KYC programs include a Customer Identification Program to verify and validate identities along with due diligence to assess the risks associated with each identity. CIP defines the process by which a business collects data to establish a reasonable belief that the identity is valid, and that the individual is eligible to participate in our financial system. While this process works in conjunction with other fraud mitigation tactics, they serve different purposes. A good CIP program emphasizes the customer experience, regulatory compliance, cost control, and smart growth. Fraud mitigation focuses on ensuring that an eligible identity is being presented by its true owner, rather than as part of a scheme to acquire goods and services with intent to default on repayment obligations. Businesses who focus on solely on fraud mitigation rather than complying with KYC and CIP regulations run the risk of potential harm to business reputation, and of course, financial penalties. Fenergo found that as of the end of 2019, global penalties for AML and KYC non-compliance totaled $36 billion. CIP vs. Fraud Mitigation Many financial institutions equate a CIP program with efforts to mitigate fraud. It’s understandable, as both processes include emphasis on the accuracy of an identity as it’s presented by a consumer. It is assumed that only the true owner of the identity would possess the detailed information necessary to meet CIP requirements and therefore would not likely be committing fraud. There was a time—prior to large scale thefts of stored information, personal details shared through social media and other behavior changes that made personal information very public—when this would have been true. Unfortunately, those days have passed and even an amateur criminal with limited experience and resources could find current, accurate identity information for sale online, information good enough to pass the CIP test and be considered a legitimate consumer. The real challenge is that when they go through CIP, many real consumers may inadvertently provide true information that doesn’t meet the verification standard. This is a result of consumer lifestyle changes outpacing the sources of data used to verify the information they’ve provided. It makes sense; in most years roughly 13% of American adults change their address. New homes, job changes and changes in marital status impact a large number of people every day. Adding to the confusion—it’s life’s changes that prompt people to borrow and purchase. The result is that many of the people that are more likely to fail CIP verification are the very people trying to legitimately access financial services. The result is that CIP verification often isn’t a challenge for those intending to commit fraud, but it can be for genuine consumers. The challenges of CIP In a recent internal study, Experian reviewed the ability to pass a standard CIP strategy that assessed the accuracy of the name, current address, date of birth and Social Security number provided by a large sample of consumers. We then compared legitimate consumers to those later confirmed to have been identity thieves impersonating a victim. Consistently, the identity thieves were at least as proficient at passing CIP as their true-consumer counterparts. In a second step, we applied a fraud score that looked for identity theft by assessing the past uses of the identities, their consistency, velocity and many other characteristics unrelated to the accuracy of the data. The difference between CIP verification and a fraud risk assessment was striking. Across the entire range of fraud risk, the percentage of records that passed CIP verification remained the same. That said, CIP still plays a very important role in risk mitigation. In fact, CIP and fraud prevention are inextricable in financial services. Just as a CIP verified identity can still be fraud, a record that may appear to be low fraud risk may not pass CIP. Since both processes have existed side by side for nearly two decades, each presumes that the other is in place and both are necessary to detect and prevent fraud. Striking a balance CIP verification and fraud mitigation strategies are both necessary and important to protecting assets and the broader financial system from fraud. It’s important to leverage a layered approach where both eligibility and risk are assessed, and next steps for verification include resolution of identity discrepancies alongside verification that ensures an identity is not being misused for fraud. Experian can help you confidently verify customer identities, understand and anticipate customer activities, and implement ongoing monitoring. If you’d like to set up a review of your current strategy or learn more about how we can help you with CIP and fraud mitigation to strengthen your ability to know your customer compliantly, let us know. Contact us
According to Experian’s latest Global Insights Report, 38% of consumers expect to increase their online activity in the next 12 months. The report also found that consumers continue to have high expectations for their online experience, and businesses are re-imagining the customer journey to reflect that need. This January, Experian surveyed 3,000 consumers and 900 businesses to explore the changes in consumer behavior and business strategy pre- and post-COVID-19. As consumers have embraced life online, they’ve continued to emphasize their feelings regarding the importance of protecting their information. More than half of consumers still consider security to be the most important factor in their digital experience – the same experience they have such high expectations of. Business are acting in turn, with more than half investing in fraud detection methods or software to reduce friction in the customer experience. Digital transformation is also highlighting the need to: Manage regulatory compliance Integrate security measures Ensure access to AI models Attract and manage customers Integrate automation solutions Download the report to get all the latest insights into consumer desires and business behaviors, and keep visiting the Insights blog for a deeper dive into US-specific findings. Download report
Over the last several weeks, I’ve shared articles about the problems surrounding third-party, first-party and synthetic identity fraud. To wrap up this series, I’d like to talk about account takeover fraud and how digital transformation has impacted it over the last year. What is account takeover fraud? Account takeover fraud is a form of identity theft that involves unauthorized access to a user’s online accounts to enable financial crimes. Criminals can obtain information in a number of ways, including the dark web, spyware and malware, and phishing to allow them to make unauthorized transactions with the user’s account. Fraudsters have made efforts to also gain control of mobile or email accounts so they can intercept one-time passwords or password change instructions to retain control of the account. Once fraudsters have control of one account, they can use it to access other personal information to breach additional accounts and graduate to full-scale identity theft. How does account takeover fraud impact me? Account takeover fraud is damaging to businesses and consumers. It leads to losses and well as resources invested to confirm fraud. The potential losses from account takeover fraud have spiked over the last year, in large part due to the opportunities created by the rapid increase of digital interactions and the influx of users interacting with merchants and financial institutions online for the first time. Aite research shows that 64% of financial institutions are seeing higher rates of ATO fraud attacks now than prior to the pandemic. – Trace Fooshee, Senior Analyst, Aite Group1 Account takeover can also be difficult to detect. Unlike credit card fraud where the true owner might quickly notice suspicious charges, an account takeover attack can go undetected for long periods of time. That’s because the criminal can change login and contact information, ensuring that the real accountholder doesn’t realize they’ve been compromised immediately. Solving the account takeover fraud problem A good account takeover fraud prevention strategy requires two things: frictionless customer experience and robust risk management. It’s clear that customers expect seamless interactions with merchants and lenders. At the same time, businesses need to be able to spot risky or suspicious behavior before a bad transaction occurs. That’s where a layered fraud management solution comes into play. With the right tools—including risk-based identity and device authentication and targeted step-up authentication—businesses can provide a good customer experience and only pull in staff for deeper investigations where necessary. With this strategy in place, businesses can easily recognize good customers and provide a more personalized experience, while at the same time combatting fraud – boosting growth and minimizing losses in the long run. I hope this series has helped provide insights into the different types of fraud and why each of them requires different treatment. To learn more about the risks of account takeover and how a layered fraud management strategy can help protect your business and your customers, feel free to contact us. 1Key Trends Driving Fraud Transformation in 2021 and Beyond, Aite Group, December 2020
With 2020 firmly behind us and multiple COVID-19 vaccines being dispersed across the globe, many of us are entering 2021 with a bit of, dare we say it, optimism. But with consumer spending and consumer confidence dipping at the end of the year, along with an inversely proportional spike in coronavirus cases, it’s apparent there’s still some uncertainty to come. This leaves businesses and consumers alike, along with fintechs and their peer financial institutions, wondering when the world’s largest economy will truly rebound. But based on the most recent numbers available from Experian, fintechs have many reasons to be bullish. In this unprecedented year, marked by a global pandemic and a number of economic and personal challenges for both businesses and consumers, Americans are maintaining healthy credit profiles and responsible spending habits. While growth expectedly slowed towards the end of the year, Q4 of 2020 saw solid job gains in the US labor market, with 883,000 jobs added through November and the US unemployment rate falling to 6.7%. Promisingly, one of the sectors hit hardest by the pandemic, the leisure and hospitality industry added back the most jobs of all sectors in October: 271,000. Additionally, US home sales hit a 14-year high fueled by record low mortgage rates. And finally, consumer sentiment rose to the highest level (81.4%) since March 2020. Not only are these promising signs of continued recovery, they illustrate there are ample market opportunities now for fintechs and other financial institutions. “It’s been encouraging to see many of our fintech partners getting back to their pre-COVID marketing levels,” said Experian Account Executive for Fintech Neil Conway. “Perhaps more promising, these fintechs are telling me that not only are response rates up but so is the credit quality of those applicants,” he said. More plainly, if your company isn’t in the market now, you’re missing out. Here are the four steps fintechs should take to reenter the lending marketing intelligently, while mitigating as much risk as possible. Re-do Your Portfolio Review Periodic portfolio reviews are standard practice for financial institutions. But the health crisis has posted unique challenges that necessitate increased focus on the health and performance of your credit portfolio. If you haven’t done so already, doing an analysis of your current lending portfolio is imperative to ensure you are minimizing risk and maximizing profitability. It’s important to understand if your portfolio is overexposed to customers in a particularly hard-hit industry, i.e. entertainment, or bars and restaurants. At the account level there may be opportunities to reevaluate customers based on a different risk appetite or credit criteria and a portfolio review will help identify which of your customers could benefit from second chance opportunities they may not have otherwise been able to receive. Retool Your Data, Analytics and Models As the pandemic has raged on, fintechs have realized many of the traditional data inputs that informed credit models and underwriting may not be giving the complete picture of a consumer. Essentially, a 720 in June 2020 may not mean the same as it does today and forbearance periods have made payment history and delinquency less predictive of future ability to pay. To stay competitive, fintechs must make sure they have access to the freshest, most predictive data. This means adding alternative data and attributes to your data-driven decisioning strategies as much as possible. Alternative data, like income and employment data, works to enhance your ability to see a consumer’s entire credit portfolio, which gives lenders the confidence to continue to lend – as well as the ability to track and monitor a consumer’s historical performance (which is a good indicator of whether or not a consumer has both the intention and ability to repay a loan). Re-Model Your Lending Criteria One of the many things the global health crisis has affirmed is the ongoing need for the freshest, most predictable data inputs. But even with the right data, analytics can still be tedious, prolonging deployment when time is of the essence. Traditional models are too slow to develop and deploy, and they underperform during sudden economic upheavals. To stay ahead in times recovery or growth, fintechs need high-quality analytics models, running on large and varied data sets that they can deploy quickly and decisively. Unlike many banks and traditional financial institutions, fintechs are positioned to nimbly take advantage of market opportunities. Once your models are performing well, they should be deployed into the market to actualize on credit-worthy current and future borrowers. Advertising/Prescreening for Intentional Acquisition As fintechs look to re-enter the market or ramp up their prescreen volumes to pre-COVID levels, it’s imperative to reach the right prospects, with the right offer, based on where and how they’re browsing. More consumers than ever are relying on their phones for browsing and mobile banking, but aligning messaging and offers across devices and platforms is still important. Here’s where data-driven advertising becomes imperative to create a more relevant experience for consumers, while protecting privacy. As 2021 rolls forward, there will be ample chance for fintechs to capitalize on new market opportunities. Through up-to-date analysis of your portfolio, ensuring you have the freshest, predictive data, adjusting your lending criteria and tweaking your approach to advertising and prescreen, you can be ready for the opportunities brought on by the economic recovery. How is your fintech gearing up to re-enter the market? Learn more
Recently, I shared articles about the problems surrounding third-party and first-party fraud. Now I’d like to explore a hybrid type – synthetic identity fraud – and how it can be the hardest type of fraud to detect. What is synthetic identity fraud? Synthetic identity fraud occurs when a criminal creates a new identity by mixing real and fictitious information. This may include blending real names, addresses, and Social Security numbers with fabricated information to create a single identity. Once created, fraudsters will use their synthetic identities to apply for credit. They employ a well-researched process to accumulate access to credit. These criminals often know which lenders have more liberal identity verification policies that will forgive data discrepancies and extend credit to people who appear to be new or emerging consumers. With each account that they add, the synthetic identity builds more credibility. Eventually, the synthetic identity will “bust out,” or max out all available credit before disappearing. Because there is no single person whose identity was stolen or misused there’s no one to track down when this happens, leaving businesses to deal with the fall out. More confounding for the lenders involved is that each of them sees the same scam through a different lens. For some, these were longer-term reliable customers who went bad. For others, the same borrower was brand new and never made a payment. Synthetic identities don\'t appear consistently as a new account problem or a portfolio problem or correlate to thick- or thin-filed identities, further complicating the issue. How does synthetic identity fraud impact me? As mentioned, when synthetic identities bust out, businesses are stuck footing the bill. Annual SIF (synthetic identity fraud) charge-offs in the United States alone could be as high as $11 billion. – Steven D’Alfonso, research director, IDC Financial Insights1 Unlike first- and third-party fraud, which deal with true identities and can be tracked back to a single person (or the criminal impersonating them), synthetic identities aren’t linked to an individual. This means that the tools used to identify those types of fraud won’t work on synthetics because there’s no victim to contact (as with third-party fraud), or real customer to contact in order to collect or pursue other remedies. Solving the synthetic identity fraud problem Preventing and detecting synthetic identities requires a multi-level solution that includes robust checkpoints throughout the customer lifecycle. During the application process, lenders must look beyond the credit report. By looking past the individual identity and analyzing its connections and relationships to other individuals and characteristics, lenders can better detect anomalies to pinpoint false identities. Consistent portfolio review is also necessary. This is best done using a risk management system that continuously monitors for all types of fraudulent activities across multiple use cases and channels. A layered approach can help prevent and detect fraud while still optimizing the customer experience. With the right tools, data, and analytics, fraud prevention can teach you more about your customers, improving your relationships with them and creating opportunities for growth while minimizing fraud losses. To wrap up this series, I’ll explore account takeover fraud and how the correct strategy can help you manage all four types of fraud while still optimizing the customer experience. To learn more about the impact of synthetic identities, download our “Preventing Synthetic Identity Fraud” white paper and call us to learn more about innovative solutions you can use to detect and prevent fraud. Contact us Download whitepaper 1Synthetic Identity Fraud Update: Effects of COVID-19 and a Potential Cure from Experian, IDC Financial Insights, July 2020
Previously, we discussed the risks of account takeover and how a Defense in Depth strategy can protect your business. Before implementation it’s important to understand the financial benefits of the strategy. There are a few key steps to assessing and quantifying the value of Defense in Depth. Transaction risk assessment: This requires taking inventory of all possible transactions. Session-level risk analysis: With the transactions categorized by risk level, the next step is to review session history based on the highest risk activity within the session. Quantify the cost of a challenge: There are multiple costs associated with challenging a user using step-up authentication. Consider both direct and indirect costs – failure rate, contact center operational cost, and attrition rate following failed challenges (consider lifetime value of account) Quantify the expected challenge rate: This can be done by comparing the Defense in Depth approach to a traditional approach. Below is a calculator that will help determine the cost of the reduced challenges associated with a Defense in Depth strategy versus a traditional strategy. initIframe(\'5f039d2e4c508b1b0aafa4bd\'); In addition to the quantitative benefits, it is important to consider some of the qualitative benefits of this approach: Challenging at moments that matter: Customers appreciate and expect protection in online banking, especially when moving money externally or updating contact information. This is a great way to achieve both convenience and security. Improved fraud management: By staging the risk decision at the transaction level, the business can balance the type of challenge with the transaction risk. There are incremental cost considerations to include in the business case as well. For instance, there is an increase in transaction calls for a risk assessment at the medium/high risk transactions – about 10% in the example above. Generally, the increased transaction cost is more than offset by the reduction in cost of challenges alone. A Defense in Depth strategy can help businesses manage fraud risk and prevent account takeover in online banking without sacrificing user experience. If you are interested in assistance with building your business case and understanding the strategies to implement a successful Defense in Depth strategy, contact us today. Contact us 1Identity Fraud in the Digital Age, Javelin Strategy & Research, September 2020
Preventing account takeover (ATO) fraud is paramount in today’s increasingly digital world. In this two-part series, we’ll explore the benefits and considerations of a Defense in Depth strategy for stopping ATO. The challenges with preventing account takeover Historically, managing fraud and identity risk in online banking has been a trade-off between customer experience and the effectiveness of fraud controls. The basic control structure relies on a lock on the front door of online banking front door—login—as the primary authentication control to defend against ATO. Within this structure, there are two choices. The first is tightening the lock, which equals a higher rate of step-up authentication challenges and lower fraud losses. The second is loosening the lock, which results in a lower challenge rate and higher fraud loses. Businesses can layer in more controls to reduce the false positives, but that only allows marginal efficiency increases and usually represents a significant expense in both time and budget to add in new controls. Now is the perfect time for businesses reassess their online banking authentication strategy for a multitude of reasons: ATO is on the rise: According to Javelin Strategy & Research, ATO increased 72% in 2019.1 Users’ identities and credentials are at more risk than ever before: Spear phishing and data breaches are now a fact of life leading to reduced effectiveness of traditional authentication controls. Online banking enrollments are on the rise: According to BioCatch, in the months following initial shelter-in-place orders across the country, banks have seen a massive spike in first time online banking access. Users expect security in online banking: Half of consumers continue to cite security as the most important factor in their online experience. Businesses who reassess the control structure for their online banking will increase the effectiveness of their tools and reduce the number of customers challenged at the same time – giving them Defense in Depth. What is Defense in Depth? Defense in Depth refers to a strategy in which a series of defense mechanisms are layered in order to protect data and information. The basic assumptions underlying the value of a Defense in Depth strategy are: Different types of transactions within online banking have different levels of inherent risk (e.g., external money movement is considerably higher risk compared to viewing recent credit card transactions) At login, the overall transaction risk associated with the session risk is unknown The risk associated with online banking is concentrated in relatively small populations – the vast majority of digital transactions are low risk This is the Pareto principle at play – i.e., about 80% of online banking risk is concentrated within about 20% of sessions. Experian research shows that risk is even more concentrated – closer to >90% of the risk is concentrated in <10% of transactions. This is relatively intuitive, as the most common activities within online banking consist of users checking their balance or reviewing recent transactions. It is much less common for customers to engage in higher risk transaction. The challenge is that businesses cannot know the session risk at the time of challenge, thus their efficiency is destined to be sub-optimal. The benefits of Defense in Depth A Defense in Depth strategy can really change the economics of an online banking security program. Adopting a strategy that continuously assesses the overall session risk as a user navigates through their session allows more efficient risk decisions at moments that matter most to the user. With that increased efficiency, businesses are better set up to prevent fraud without frustrating legitimate users. Defense in Depth allows businesses to intelligently layer security protocols to protect against vulnerability – helping to prevent theft and reputational losses and minimize end-user frustration. In addition to these benefits, a continuous risk-based approach can have lower overall operational costs than a traditional security approach. The second part of this series will explore the cost considerations associated with the Defense in Depth strategy explored above. In the meantime, feel free to reach out to discuss options. Contact us 1Identity Fraud in the Digital Age, Javelin Strategy & Research, September 2020
It’s clear that the digital transformation we experienced this year is here to stay. While there are many positives associated with this transformation – innovation, new ways to work, and greater online connectedness – it’s important that we review the risks associated with these trends as well. In late 2019 and throughout 2020, Experian surveyed consumers and businesses. We asked about online habits, expectations for information security and plans for future spending. Unsurprisingly, about half of consumers think they’ll continue to spend more online in the coming year. Those same consumers now have a higher expectation for their online experience than before the onset of COVID-19. Hand-in-hand with the online activity trends come increased risks associated with identity theft and fraud as criminals find new chances to steal information. In response to both of these trends, businesses and consumers want a balance between security and convenience. Our latest trends report dives into the new opportunities 2020 has created for fraud, and the opportunities to prevent identity theft or manipulation and the associated losses while building stronger relationships. Download the full North America Trends Report for a look into North American trends over the last year and to learn how fraud prevention and positive customer relationships are actually two sides of the same coin. North America Trends Report
A few weeks ago, I shared the first in a series of articles about understanding the different types of fraud and how to solve for them. In that article, I likened the fraud problem to baking. Continuing that theme, I’m going to explore first-party fraud by comparing it to biting into a cookie you think is chocolate chip, only to find that it’s filled with raisins. The raisins in the cookie were hiding in plain sight, indistinguishable from chocolate chips without a closer look, much like first-party fraudsters. What is first-party fraud? First-party fraud refers to instances when an individual makes a promise of future repayments in exchange for goods or services without the intent to repay. The fraudster might accomplish this by applying for a loan or credit card they won’t pay back, or misrepresenting their financial situation to get a more favorable rate. First-party fraud sometimes presents via “mules” or consumers who are persuaded to use their own information to obtain credit or merchandise on behalf of a larger fraud ring. This type of fraud has become especially prevalent in 2020 due to the increases in online activity for both work and purchasing. Mule activity has increased by 41% in 2020 in comparison to attack rates prior to the pandemic. – Julie Conroy, Research Director, Aite Group First-party fraud is often miscategorized as credit loss and written off as bad debt, which causes problems when businesses later try to determine how much they’ve lost to fraud versus credit risk, and then make future lending decisions. How does first-party fraud impact me? Firstly, there are often substantial losses associated with first-party fraud. According to Payments Journal, 60% of financial institutions report first-party fraud as the prominent source of fraud losses. The ranks of those who commission the attacks, as well as the mules who provide logistical support, will continue to increase at the same pace, if not more quickly, as economic conditions remain suppressed. The result will be an increase in the volume of attacks in general but with a particular emphasis on the kinds of fraud that typically accompany prolonged recessions, most notably first-party fraud.1 – Trace Fooshee, Senior Analyst, Aite Group An imperfect first-party fraud solution can also strain relationships with good customers and hinder growth. When lenders have to interpret actions and behavior to assess customers, there’s a lot of room for error and losses. Those same losses hinder growth when, as mentioned before, businesses anticipate credit losses that aren’t actually credit losses. This type of fraud isn’t a single-time event, and it doesn’t occur at just one point in the customer lifecycle. It occurs when good customers develop fraudulent intent, when new applicants who have positive history with other lenders have recently changed circumstances, or when seemingly good applicants have manipulated their identities to mask previous defaults. Finally, first-party fraud impacts how your organization categorizes and manages risk – and that’s something that touches every department. Solving the first-party fraud problem Preventing first-party fraud requires a change in how we think about the fraud problem. It starts with the ability to separate first- and third-party fraud to treat them differently. Because first-party fraud doesn’t have a victim, you can’t work with the person whose information was stolen to confirm the fraud. Instead, you’ll have to work implement a consistent monitoring system and make a determination internally when fraud is suspected. As we’ve already discussed, the fraud problem is complex. However with a partner like Experian, you have the tools required to perform a closer examination and the ability to differentiate between the types of fraud so you can determine the best course of action moving forward. In the coming weeks, I’ll continue my exploration of this topic with a dive into synthetic identity and account takeover fraud, and how a layered fraud management strategy can help you minimize customer friction to improve and deepen your relationships while preventing fraud. Contact us if you’d like to learn more about how Experian is using our identity expertise, data, and analytics to detect and prevent all types of fraud. Contact us 1Key Trends Driving Fraud Transformation in 2021 and Beyond, December 2020
Experian recently announced the new members named to its Fintech Advisory Board. The board and its members provide Experian with valuable insights and key perspectives into the unique and quickly evolving needs of the fintech industry. “For years Experian has been committed to partnering with innovators in the fintech industry to bring better opportunities to businesses and consumers alike,” said Experian North American CEO Craig Boundy. “We appreciate the thought leadership we get from our Fintech Advisory Board members and the challenge and the push that comes along with it,” he said. The board met virtually last month, welcoming representatives from across the fintech ecosystem representing payments, personal and secured loan lenders, credit card issuers, investors and others. “This was my first board meeting with Experian, and I’m very pleased to see the investment Experian has put into being the best of the three major bureaus in having the best technology to enable us to turnaround our models more quickly, and better data and alternative data sources like Boost,” said one of the new executives appointed to the board. “We are delighted to gather this group of innovators together to ensure we are consistently meeting the needs of our fintech partners,” said Experian Vice President Jon Bailey, who oversees the fintech vertical. “Now more than ever it’s important that we work alongside them in shaping the industry and helping them meet their goals for the future,” he said. Experian’s fintech vertical provides leading-edge solutions and data across the credit lifecycle specifically designed to impact Fintech and marketplace lending companies and their customers. For more information on Experian’s fintech services or the advisory board, click here.
Learn More Image
