Full Block Accessibility Test

  Many small businesses in the hardest-hit states missed out on the first round of federal relief through the recently created Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act established the PPP in order to disburse $349 billion in forgivable loans to small businesses hurt by the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the program’s funding limit and first-come, first-serve method for accepting loan applications put an immense strain on the financial institutions tasked with getting the money out the door. This resulted in many small businesses unable to get their applications submitted, approved, and funded before the program ran out of money after only two weeks. Where did the money go? The latest data from the Small Business Administration shows that the most populous states received the largest number of PPP loans. This is unsurprising, as states with higher populations tend to have a greater number of small businesses. One way to get a better picture of the impact of PPP loans on communities is to examine what percentage of a state’s small businesses received PPP loans (Figure 1). When viewed through this lens, the results are a quite striking – many of the coastal areas and larger markets missed out, while the rural, north-central states won out. Less than 4% of small businesses in California, Florida, and New York – three of the top five largest markets – were approved for PPP loans. While more than 12% of small businesses in North Dakota, Nebraska, and South Dakota received support.       What happened? There are several factors that could have played a part in the uneven distribution of PPP loans. One explanation may be that some financial institutions in highly populated urban areas did not have the capacity to process such a large volume of loan applications in such a short amount of time. There may also be an urban-rural divide to how relationship banking occurs. Rural communities and small businesses with close-knit ties to area financial institutions may have had easier access to getting their PPP applications submitted and approved. In line with this, Figure 2 shows the top five and bottom five states in terms of financial institutions (banks and credit unions) per 100,000 people. The states with the highest prevalence of financial institutions were also the top states for PPP small business loan share. While the states with the lowest prevalence of financial institutions were the states with the smallest share. Another factor may have been the extent that shelter-in-place rules were being enforced. North Dakota, Nebraska, and South Dakota – the three top states for loan share – are part of the handful of states that still do not have statewide lockdowns. California, on the other hand, was the first state in the country to issue shelter-in-place measures. Why it matters The first round of stimulus through the Paycheck Protection Program provided relief for many small businesses around the country. However, the first-come, first-serve method of distributing loans may have resulted in some small business communities having easier access to the program than others. Insights as to why these differences occurred and why small businesses in the larger markets received a lower share of PPP loans can inform future stimulus efforts and ensure that recovery among the states is as even and broad as possible.   Figure 1 Sources: Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program Report 4/16/2020, Census Bureau SUSB and NES Statistics. Author’s calculations. Figure 2 Sources: Experian data on financial institutions, Census Bureau population estimates. Author's calculations.

The response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) health crisis requires a brand-new mindset from businesses across the country. As part of our recently launched Q&A perspective series, Jim Bander, Market Lead of Analytics and Optimization and Kathleen Peters, Senior Vice President of Fraud and Identity, provided insight into how businesses can work to mitigate fraud and portfolio risk. Q: How can financial institutions mitigate fraud risk while monitoring portfolios? JB: The most important shift in portfolio monitoring is the view of the customer, because it’s very different during times of crisis than it is during expansionary periods. Financial institutions need to take a holistic view of their customers and use additional credit dimensions to understand consumers’ reactions to stress. While many businesses were preparing for a recession, the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus has already surpassed the stress-testing that most businesses performed. To help mitigate the increased risk, businesses need to understand how their stress testing was performed in the past and run new stress tests to understand how financially sound their institution is. KP: Most businesses—and particularly financial institutions—have suspended or relaxed many of their usual risk mitigation tools and strategies, in an effort to help support customers during this time of uncertainty. Many financial institutions are offering debt and late fee forgiveness, credit extensions, and more to help consumers bridge the financial gaps caused by the economic downturn. Unfortunately, the same actions that help consumers can hamstring fraud prevention efforts because they impact the usual risk indicators. To weather this storm, financial institutions need to pivot from standard risk mitigation strategies to more targeted fraud and identity strategies. Q: How can financial institutions’ exposure to risk be managed? JB: Financial institutions are trying to extend as much credit as is reasonably possible—per government guidelines—but when the first stage of this crisis passes, they need to be prepared to deal with the consequences. Specifically, which borrowers will actually repay their loans. Financial institutions should monitor consumer health and use proactive outreach to offer assistance while keeping a finger on the pulse of their customers’ financial health. For the foreseeable future, the focus will be on extending credit, not collecting on debt, but now is the time to start preparing for the economic aftermath. Consumer health monitoring is key, and it must include a strategy to differentiate credit abusers and other fraudsters from overall good consumers who are just financially stressed. KP: As financial institutions work to get all of their customers set up with online and mobile banking and account access, there’s an influx of new requests that all require consumer authentication, device identification, and sometimes even underwriting. All of this puts pressure on already strained resources which means increased fraud risk. To manage this risk, businesses need to balance customer experience—particularly minimizing friction—with vigilance against fraudsters and reputational risk. It will require a robust and flexible fraud strategy that utilizes automated tools as much as possible to free up personnel to follow up on the riskiest users and transactions.   Experian is closely monitoring the updates around the coronavirus outbreak and its widespread impact on both consumers and businesses. We will continue to share industry-leading insights to help financial institutions manage their portfolios and protect against losses. Learn more About Our Experts: [avatar user="jim.bander" /] Jim Bander, Market Lead, Analytics and Optimization, Experian Decision Analytics, North America Jim joined Experian in April 2018 and is responsible for solutions and value propositions applying analytics for financial institutions and other Experian business-to-business clients throughout North America. He has over 20 years of analytics, software, engineering and risk management experience across a variety of industries and disciplines. Jim has applied decision science to many industries, including banking, transportation and the public sector. [avatar user="kathleen.peters" /] Kathleen Peters, Vice President, Fraud and Identity, Experian Decision Analytics, North America Kathleen joined Experian in 2013 to lead business development and international sales for the recently acquired 41st Parameter business in San Jose, Calif. She went on to lead product management for Experian’s fraud and identity group within the global Decision Analytics organization, launching Experian’s CrossCore® platform in 2016, a groundbreaking and award-winning new offering for the fraud and identity market. The last two years, Kathleen has been named a “Top 100 Influencer in Identity” by One World Identity (OWI), an exclusive list that annually recognizes influencers and leaders from across the globe, showcasing a who’s who of people to know in the identity space.

As financial institutions and other organizations scramble to formulate crisis response plans, it’s important to consider the power of data and analytics. Jim Bander, PhD, Experian’s Analytics and Optimization Market Lead discusses the ways that data, analytics and models can help during a crisis. Check out what he had to say: What implications does the global pandemic have on financial institutions’ analytical needs?  JB: COVID-19 is a humanitarian crisis, one that parallels Hurricanes Sandy and Katrina and other natural disasters but which far exceeds their magnitude. It is difficult to predict the impact as huge parts of the global economy have shut down. Another dimension of this disaster is the financial impact: in the US alone, more than 17 million people applied for unemployment in the first 6 weeks of the COVID-19 crisis. That compares to 15 million people in 18 months during the Great Recession. Data and analytics are more important than ever as financial institutions formulate their responses to this crisis. Those institutions need to focus on three key things: safety, soundness, and compliance. Safety: Financial institutions are taking immediate action to mitigate safety risks for their employees and their customers. Soundness: Organizations need to mitigate credit and fraud risk and to evaluate capital and liquidity. Some executives may need a better understanding of how their bank’s stress scenarios were calculated in the past to understand how they must be updated for the future. Important analytic functions include performing portfolio monitoring and benchmarking—quantifying the effects not only of consumer distress, but also of low interest rates. Compliance: Understanding and meeting complex regulatory and compliance requirements is crucial at this time. Companies have to adapt to new credit reporting guidelines. CECL requirements have been relaxed but lenders should assess the effects of COVID, and not only during their annual stress tests. As more consumers seek credit, from an analytics perspective, what considerations should financial institutions make during this time?  JB: During this volatile time, analytics will help financial institutions: Identify financially stressed consumers with early warning indicators Predict future consumer behavior Respond quickly to changes Deliver the best treatments at the right time for individual customers given their specific situations and their specific behavior. Financial institutions should be reevaluating where their organizations have the most vulnerability and should be taking immediate action to mitigate these risks. Some important areas to keep an eye on include early warning indicators, changes in fraudulent behavior (with the increase in digital engagements), and changes in customer behavior. Banks are already offering payment flexibility, deferments, and credit reporting accommodations. If volatility continues or increases, they may need to offer debt forgiveness plans. These organizations should also be prepared to understand their own changing constraints—such as budget, staffing levels, and liquidity requirements— especially as consumers accelerate their move to digital channels. In the near future, lenders should be optimizing their operations, servicing treatments, and lending policies to meet a number of possibly conflicting objectives in the presence of changing constraints and somewhat unpredictable transaction volumes.   What is the smartest next play for financial institutions?  JB: I see our smartest clients doing four things: Adapting to the new normal Maintaining engagement with existing customers by refreshing data that companies have on-hand for these consumers, and obtain additional views of these customers for analytics and data-driven decisioning Reallocating operational resources and anticipating the need for increased capacity in various servicing departments in the future Improving their risk management practices   What is Experian doing to help clients improve their risk management? JB: During this time, banks and other financial institutions are searching for ways to predict consumer behavior, especially during a crisis that combines aspects of a natural disaster with characteristics of a global recession. It is more important than ever to use analytics and optimization. But some of the details of the methodology is different now than during a time of economic expansion. For example, while credit scores (like FICO® and VantageScore® credit scores) will continue to rank consumers in terms of their probability to pay, those scores must be interpreted differently. Furthermore, those scores should be combined with other views of the consumer—such as trends in consumer behavior and with expanded FCRA-compliant data (data that isn’t reported to traditional credit bureaus). One way we’re helping clients improve their credit risk management is to provide them with a list of 140 consumer credit data attributes in 10 categories. With this list, companies will be able to better manage portfolio risk, to better understand consumer behavior, and to select the next best action for each consumer. Four other things we’re doing: We’re quickly updating our loss forecasting and liquidity management offerings to account for new stress scenarios. We’re helping clients review their statistical models’ performance and their customer segmentation practices, and helping to update the models that need refreshing. Our consulting team—Experian Advisory Services—has been meeting with clients virtually–helping them update, execute their crisis and downturn responses, and whiteboard new or updated tactical plans. Last but not least, we’re helping lenders and consumers defend themselves against a variety of fraud and identity theft schemes. Experian is committed to helping your organization during these uncertain times. For more resources, visit our Look Ahead 2020 Hub. Learn more Jim Bander, PhD, Analytics and Optimization Market Lead, Decision Analytics, Experian North America Jim Bander, PhD joined Experian in April 2018 and is responsible for solutions and value propositions applying analytics for financial institutions and other Experian business-to-business clients throughout North America. Jim has over 20 years of analytics, software, engineering and risk management experience across a variety of industries and disciplines. He has applied decision science to many industries including banking, transportation and the public sector. He is a consultant and frequent speaker on topics ranging from artificial intelligence and machine learning to debt management and recession readiness. Prior to joining Experian, he led the Decision Sciences team in the Risk Management department at Toyota Financial Services.