
In this article…
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus at nisl nunc. Sed et nunc a erat vestibulum faucibus. Sed fermentum placerat mi aliquet vulputate. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Maecenas ante dolor, venenatis vitae neque pulvinar, gravida gravida quam. Phasellus tempor rhoncus ante, ac viverra justo scelerisque at. Sed sollicitudin elit vitae est lobortis luctus. Mauris vel ex at metus cursus vestibulum lobortis cursus quam. Donec egestas cursus ex quis molestie. Mauris vel porttitor sapien. Curabitur tempor velit nulla, in tempor enim lacinia vitae. Sed cursus nunc nec auctor aliquam. Morbi fermentum, nisl nec pulvinar dapibus, lectus justo commodo lectus, eu interdum dolor metus et risus. Vivamus bibendum dolor tellus, ut efficitur nibh porttitor nec.
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Maecenas facilisis pellentesque urna, et porta risus ornare id. Morbi augue sem, finibus quis turpis vitae, lobortis malesuada erat. Nullam vehicula rutrum urna et rutrum. Mauris convallis ac quam eget ornare. Nunc pellentesque risus dapibus nibh auctor tempor. Nulla neque tortor, feugiat in aliquet eget, tempus eget justo. Praesent vehicula aliquet tellus, ac bibendum tortor ullamcorper sit amet. Pellentesque tempus lacus eget aliquet euismod. Nam quis sapien metus. Nam eu interdum orci. Sed consequat, lectus quis interdum placerat, purus leo venenatis mi, ut ullamcorper dui lorem sit amet nunc. Donec semper suscipit quam eu blandit. Sed quis maximus metus. Nullam efficitur efficitur viverra. Curabitur egestas eu arcu in cursus.
H1
H2
H3
H4
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum dapibus ullamcorper ex, sed congue massa. Duis at fringilla nisi. Aenean eu nibh vitae quam auctor ultrices. Donec consequat mattis viverra. Morbi sed egestas ante. Vivamus ornare nulla sapien. Integer mollis semper egestas. Cras vehicula erat eu ligula commodo vestibulum. Fusce at pulvinar urna, ut iaculis eros. Pellentesque volutpat leo non dui aliquet, sagittis auctor tellus accumsan. Curabitur nibh mauris, placerat sed pulvinar in, ullamcorper non nunc. Praesent id imperdiet lorem.
H5
Curabitur id purus est. Fusce porttitor tortor ut ante volutpat egestas. Quisque imperdiet lobortis justo, ac vulputate eros imperdiet ut. Phasellus erat urna, pulvinar id turpis sit amet, aliquet dictum metus. Fusce et dapibus ipsum, at lacinia purus. Vestibulum euismod lectus quis ex porta, eget elementum elit fermentum. Sed semper convallis urna, at ultrices nibh euismod eu. Cras ultrices sem quis arcu fermentum viverra. Nullam hendrerit venenatis orci, id dictum leo elementum et. Sed mattis facilisis lectus ac laoreet. Nam a turpis mattis, egestas augue eu, faucibus ex. Integer pulvinar ut risus id auctor. Sed in mauris convallis, interdum mi non, sodales lorem. Praesent dignissim libero ligula, eu mattis nibh convallis a. Nunc pulvinar venenatis leo, ac rhoncus eros euismod sed. Quisque vulputate faucibus elit, vitae varius arcu congue et.
Ut convallis cursus dictum. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Ut eleifend eget erat vitae tempor. Nam tempus pulvinar dui, ac auctor augue pharetra nec. Sed magna augue, interdum a gravida ac, lacinia quis erat. Pellentesque fermentum in enim at tempor. Proin suscipit, odio ut lobortis semper, est dolor maximus elit, ac fringilla lorem ex eu mauris.
- Phasellus vitae elit et dui fermentum ornare. Vestibulum non odio nec nulla accumsan feugiat nec eu nibh. Cras tincidunt sem sed lacinia mollis. Vivamus augue justo, placerat vel euismod vitae, feugiat at sapien. Maecenas sed blandit dolor. Maecenas vel mauris arcu. Morbi id ligula congue, feugiat nisl nec, vulputate purus. Nunc nec aliquet tortor. Maecenas interdum lectus a hendrerit tristique. Ut sit amet feugiat velit.
- Test
- Yes

Online transactions face a higher chance of being declined because face-to-face transactions come with a higher degree of confidence. Businesses who fail to address this problem run the risk of losing the customer permanently, damaging their reputation and bottom line. What can e-commerce marketplace merchants do to increase the approval rate of online payments without making fraud worse? Here are three tips: 1. Broaden access to data beyond what’s in the authorization stream. Merchants use a variety of solutions to prevent fraud and verify identities, but typically use very limited data to approve a transaction through the authorization stream between a merchant and issuer. The issuing bank often only compares the purchase data to the address listed on the card owner’s account, which can create discrepancies when a customer is trying to send an order to an alternate address from their primary home. That’s why it’s important for merchants to augment their decisioning with additional data sources to help inform the true customer risk profile. 2. Leverage capabilities that can assess risk for both the transaction and the individual behind it. Today, merchants leverage limited data including email address data, device information and other technologies in silos to augment their address verification capabilities. The challenge with these tools is that each judge the risk of a specific component of the transaction or the individual. Where integration is lacking, false positives are amplified. 3. Collaborate and share expertise and data across merchants and issuers. How can Experian help? Leveraging our multidimensional data, technical expertise and advanced analytics capabilities, we can help businesses frictionlessly authenticate valid customers, thus increasing revenue by increased approval rates, without increasing fraud or operating expenses. Only Experian Link™, our frictionless credit card owner verification solution can associate payment card with its owner. This solution combines Experian’s vast data assets – including over 500 million credit card account numbers on file in the U.S. across 250 million consumers – with our advanced analytics capabilities to match and assess the risk of the identity attributes presented to the merchant to the identity attributes contributed by the credit card’s issuer and to Experian’s network of credit and identity inquiries. The result: Experian Link’s patent-pending REST API simply and frictionlessly improves a merchant’s customer experience and helps increase revenue while reducing their fraud and operating expenses. Get started with Experian Link™ now. Experian Link

Even as 75% of large and mid-sized U.S. e-commerce marketplace merchants predict continued double-digit online sales growth rates through the end of 2022,1 their success is hampered by unnecessary friction driven by concerns of card-not-present fraud and additional fraud risks in an online world. Compared to the 96% approval rate for point-of-sale purchases, card-not-present transactions yield a surprisingly low 81% approval rate. According to a survey conducted by Aite Novarica,1 the difference stems from reviewing up to 16% of attempted transactions for possible fraud. Even more surprising is that many of the respondents report that more than two-thirds of these reviews are later found to be unwarranted. Current transaction processing and risk capabilities are impeding growth and creating friction that damages e-commerce marketplace brands. What do we mean when we talk about online card-not-present transaction friction? Much of the success or failure of e-commerce depends on how easy merchants make it for consumers to complete a transaction. Effective identity resolution, fraud mitigation and risk solutions can lead to increased sales, while unrefined solutions and unnecessary friction will run merchants the risk of denying a legitimate customer purchase at checkout because they have been incorrectly labeled a fraudster–a ‘false positive’ or ‘false decline.’ These solutions leave room for improvement based on several key factors–the limited amount of data that passes through the authorization stream from the merchant to the issuer is a key contributor. According to Aite-Novarica Group’s The E-Commerce Fraud Enigma: The Quest to Maximize Revenue While Minimizing Fraud Report, “This reinforces the importance for merchants to augment the decisioning on their side with a wide variety of data sources that can help inform them regarding the risk profile of both the customer and the transaction.” Challenges with current transaction processing and verification tools Today, merchants leverage email address data, device information and other technologies to augment their address verification capabilities. The challenge is that these tools each judge the risk of a specific component of the transaction or the individual. Where integration is lacking, false positives are amplified and that is exactly what the data1 says is happening. Different tools working in isolation all catch the same fraud but flag different false positives—dragging down overall performance. The result is that 75% of e-commerce merchants place maximizing sales, minimizing friction and reducing false declines at the top of their to-do list. 88% say they are ready for a change to achieve these goals.1 Fast Facts 16% of all attempted online transactions experience friction for suspected fraud. 70% of this number is unnecessary, and upon manual review, are ultimately approved.1 78% of e-commerce merchants report friction driven by suspected fraud is increasing. 78% of merchants report increasing declines due to suspected fraud over the last two years. 46% indicate an increase of more than 5%.1 81% of consumers say that a positive online experience makes them think more highly of a brand.2 The longer it takes for banks and issuers to process new account, the higher the rate of abandonment, which reaches 40% when the process takes longer than 10 minutes.3 The friction that consumers encounter throughout their buying journey and the expenses associated with merchant and issuer manual reviews can be costly. It is estimated that 70% of unwarranted friction is costing businesses ~$11B in false decline losses and sales annually.1 That number is expected to increase. And, beyond profit losses incurred from the order that was declined, merchants risk damaging brand reputation because of poor customer/buying experiences, and in some cases, the loss of the customer relationship as well. Reducing friction and providing a positive shopping experience is increasingly important to business success Businesses looking to address this and limit false declines should not allow this to come at the expense completing transactions for legitimate customers. Experian can help. By leveraging our multidimensional data, technical expertise and advanced analytics capabilities, we can help businesses authenticate valid customers without unnecessary friction, thus increasing revenue by increased approval rates, without increasing fraud or operating expenses. Get started with Experian Link™ – our frictionless credit card owner verification solution. Learn more. Experian Link 1"E-Commerece Fraud Enigma: The Quest to Maximize Revenue While Minimizing Fraud Report" Aite-Novarica Group, July 2022 2"Global Insights Report: The Evolving Expectations and Experience of the New Digital Customer" Experian, April 2022 3"Capturing the Digital Identity Evolution Through a Layered Approach" Liminal, June 2021

There’s no doubt that fraudulent transactions can end up costing businesses money , which have led many to implement risk-mitigation strategies across every stage of the purchasing journey. However, this very same protection can increase false declines, and the associated friction can create high rates of cart-abandonment and negative impacts for a business’s brand. What is a false decline? A false decline is a legitimate transaction that is not completed due to suspected fraud or the friction that occurs during verification. False declines occur when a good customer is suspected of fraud and then prevented from completing a purchase. This happens when a company’s fraud prevention solution provides inadequate insight into the identity of the customer, flagging them as a potential bad actor. The result is a missed sale for the business and a frustrating transaction and experience for the customer. Are false declines costing your business money? False declines have high revenue and cost consequences for e-commerce marketplace merchants. By denying a legitimate customer purchase at checkout, businesses risk: Loss of new sales directly impacting revenue 16% of all sales are rejected by e-commerce merchants unnecessarily costing businesses ~$11B in sales annually,1 with an estimated 70% of unwarranted friction as a contributing cause. Loss in customer loyalty and lifetime value Blocked payments can leave customers with a poor impression of your business and there’s a good chance they’ll take their business elsewhere. Tarnished business reputation Today’s customers expect businesses and online services to work seamlessly. 81% of consumers say a positive experience makes them think more highly of a brand. Therefore, your brand might take a hit if unnecessary obstacles prevent them from having a good experience. High operational overhead costs The average business manually reviews 16% of transactions for fraud risk. It is estimated that 10 minutes are needed for each review. This inefficiency can be costly as it takes time away from fraud teams who can work on higher priority or strategic initiatives. Businesses can benefit from a seamless and secure payment experience that drives real-time resolution and eliminates a majority of false declines and bottlenecks, ultimately helping increase approval rates without increasing risk. Get started with Experian Link™ – our frictionless credit card owner verification solution. Learn more 1"E-Commerece Fraud Enigma: The Quest to Maximize Revenue While Minimizing Fraud Report" Aite-Novarica Group, July 2022


