Test

Fraud-as-a-Service (FaaS) represents an emerging and increasingly sophisticated business model within cybercrime. In this model, malicious actors commercialize their expertise, tools, and infrastructure, enabling others to perpetrate fraud more easily and efficiently. These FaaS offerings are often accessible via dark web marketplaces or underground forums, streamlining and automating fraud processes, such as large-scale phishing campaigns. This enables the creation of convincing counterfeit websites and the distribution of bulk emails, allowing cybercriminals to harvest credentials and personal information en masse.   Organized cybercrime syndicates leverage account creation bots to establish hundreds of fraudulent accounts across various platforms, bypassing standard security protocols and scaling their illicit activities seamlessly. A fraudster no longer requires deep technical skills or detailed knowledge of complex verification techniques, such as liveness detection. Instead, they can acquire turnkey FaaS solutions that, for instance, inject pre-recorded video footage to spoof verification processes, enabling the rapid creation of thousands of fraudulent accounts.  The commoditization of fraud has effectively democratized it, lowering the barriers to entry. Previously accessible to a select few, FaaS has developed sophisticated techniques and is now available to a broader and less technically adept audience. Now, even individuals with basic computer skills can access these services and initiate fraudulent schemes with minimal effort.   Key tools in the FaaS arsenal  Central to the success of fraud-as-a-service is the ability to create fraudulent accounts while evading detection. This process can be alarmingly straightforward, even for companies adhering to industry-recognized best practices. Widely available programs, such as app cloners, enable fraudsters to generate multiple instances of the same application on a single device, modifying its source code to bypass security measures to detect such activities. The generalization of artifical intelligence (AI) and increased access to technology have provided cybercriminals with new tools to launch sophisticated scams, such as Pig Butchering and Authorized Push Payment (APP) scams.   Similarly, image injection tools facilitate the insertion of manipulated images to deceive verification systems, while emulators simulate legitimate device activity at scale, making detection more challenging. Techniques such as location spoofing allow fraudsters to alter the perceived geographical location of a device, thereby evading location-based security checks and allowing their scams to remain undetected.  Once fraudulent accounts are established, cybercriminals focus on monetizing their efforts. Industries like food delivery and ride-hailing are particularly vulnerable to promotional abuse. Fraudsters exploit promotional offers intended for new customers by using cloned apps, injected images, and emulators to create multiple fake accounts, redeem discounts, and resell them for profit. AI-driven automation and advanced communication technologies lower the barriers for these scams, enabling criminals to operate at a larger scale and with greater efficiency. This has made scams more pervasive and difficult for individuals and institutions to detect.  In the ride-hailing industry, these tactics are used to manipulate fare structures and incentives. Fraudsters operate multiple driver or rider accounts on the same device to earn referral bonuses and other promotional rewards. Emulators can simulate rides with fabricated start and end points, while location spoofing tools manipulate GPS data, inflating fares, and earnings. Such fraudulent activities result in significant financial losses for companies and degrade service quality for legitimate users, as resources are diverted from genuine transactions and logistical algorithms are disrupted.  The implications of FaaS for businesses  The commercialization of fraud poses a substantial threat to businesses, not only by democratizing fraud but also by enabling it to rapidly scale. . Fraudsters can experiment with multiple schemes simultaneously, sharing feedback and accelerating their learning curve. A single tool developed by one individual can be deployed by numerous bad actors to perpetrate fraud on a large scale, with remarkable speed. This ease of execution allows fraudsters to overwhelm companies with a barrage of attacks, maximizing their financial gains while exacerbating the challenges of fraud prevention for targeted organizations.  Developing a FaaS-Resilient fraud prevention strategy  To effectively combat fraud-as-a-service, businesses must adopt AI fraud strategies that mirror the operational sophistication of fraudsters. These cybercriminals treat their activities as profitable enterprises, continually optimizing their return on investment through scalable and adaptable tactics. By deeply understanding the methodologies employed by fraudsters, companies can develop more effective fraud prevention measures that disrupt fraudulent operations without inconveniencing legitimate users.  Proactive fraud prevention strategies are essential in countering FaaS tactics. Effective measures rely on robust data collection and analysis. Regular reviews of key performance indicators (KPIs) and velocity checks, which monitor the rate at which users complete transactions, can help identify irregular behaviors.  Passive signals, such as device fingerprinting and location intelligence, are also invaluable in detecting suspicious activities. By scrutinizing data related to app tampering or device emulation, businesses can more accurately determine whether a genuine user is accessing their platform or if a fraudster is attempting to bypass detection.  Given the dynamic nature of FaaS, adaptation is crucial. Fraud prevention strategies must evolve continually to keep pace with emerging threats. Advanced technologies offer nuanced insights into user behavior, enabling businesses to identify and thwart fraud attempts with greater precision. Moreover, cutting-edge risk monitoring tools can help avoid false positives, ensuring that legitimate users are not unduly impacted.  As fraudsters persist in innovating and refining their tactics, organizations must remain vigilant, stay informed about emerging trends, invest in advanced fraud prevention and detection technologies, and cultivate a culture of security and awareness. While it may be tempting to underestimate fraudsters due to the illicit nature of their activities, it is important to recognize that many approach their work with a level of professionalism comparable to legitimate businesses. Understanding this reality offers valuable insights into how companies can effectively counteract fraud and protect their monetary interests.  Learn more This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

In this article…What is reject inference? How can reject inference enhance underwriting? Techniques in reject inference Enhancing reject inference design for better classification How Experian can assist with reject inference  In the lending world, making precise underwriting decisions is key to minimizing risks and optimizing returns. One valuable yet often overlooked technique that can significantly enhance your credit underwriting process is reject inferencing. This blog post offers insights into what reject inference is, how it can improve underwriting, and various reject inference methods.  What is reject inference?  Reject inference is a statistical method used to predict the potential performance of applicants who were rejected for a loan or credit — or approved but did not book. In essence, it helps lenders and financial institutions gauge how rejected or non-booked applicants might have performed had they been accepted or booked. By incorporating reject inference, you gain a more comprehensive view of the applicant pool, which leads to more informed underwriting decisions.  Utilizing reject inference helps reduce biases in your models, as decisions are based on a complete set of data, including those who were initially rejected. This technique is crucial for refining credit risk models, leading to more accurate predictions and improved financial outcomes.  How can reject inference enhance underwriting?  Incorporating reject inference into your underwriting process offers several advantages:  Identifying high-potential customers: By understanding the potential behavior of rejected applicants, you can uncover high-potential customers who might have been overlooked before.  Improved risk assessment: Considering the full spectrum of applicants provides a clearer picture of the overall risk landscape, allowing for more informed lending decisions. This can help reduce default rates and enhance portfolio performance.  Optimizing credit decisioning models: Including inferred data from rejected and non-booked applicants makes your credit scoring models more representative of the entire applicant population. This results in more robust and reliable predictions.  Techniques in reject inference  Several techniques are employed in reject inference, each with unique strengths and applications. Understanding these techniques is crucial for effectively implementing reject inference in your underwriting process. Let's discuss three commonly used techniques:  Parceling: This technique involves segmenting rejected applicants based on their characteristics and behaviors, creating a more detailed view of the applicant pool for more precise predictions.  Augmentation: This method adds inferred data to the dataset of approved applicants, producing a more comprehensive model that includes both approved and inferred rejected applicants, leading to better predictions.  Reweighting: This technique adjusts the weights of approved applicants to reflect the characteristics of rejected applicants, minimizing bias towards the approved applicants and improving prediction accuracy.  Pre-diction method  The pre-diction method is a common approach in reject inference that uses data collected at the time of application to predict the performance of rejected applicants. The advantage of this method is its reliance on real-time data, making it highly relevant and current.  For example, pre-diction data can include credit bureau attributes from the time of application. This method helps develop a model that predicts the outcomes of rejected applicants based on performance data from approved applicants. However, it may not capture long-term trends and could be less effective for applicants with unique characteristics.  Post-diction method  The post-diction method uses data collected after the performance window to predict the performance of rejected applicants. Leveraging historical data, this method is ideal for capturing long-term trends and behaviors.  Post-diction data may include credit bureau attributes from the end of the performance window. This method helps develop a model based on historical performance data, which is beneficial for applicants with unique characteristics and can lead to higher performance metrics. However, it may be less timely and require more complex data processing compared to pre-diction.  Enhancing reject inference design for better classification  To optimize your reject inference design, focus on creating a model that accurately classifies the performance of rejected and non-booked applicants. Utilize a combination of pre-diction and post-diction data to capture both real-time and historical trends.  Start by developing a parceling model using pre-diction data, such as credit bureau attributes from the time of application, to predict rejected applicants' outcomes. Regularly update your model with the latest data to maintain its relevance.  Next, incorporate post-diction data, including attributes from the end of the performance window, to capture long-term trends. Combining both data types will result in a more comprehensive model.  Consider leveraging advanced analytics techniques like machine learning and artificial intelligence to refine your model further, identifying hidden patterns and relationships for more accurate predictions. How Experian can assist with reject inference  Reject inference is a powerful tool for enhancing your underwriting process. By predicting the potential performance of rejected and non-booked applicants, you can make more inclusive and accurate decisions, leading to improved risk assessment and optimized credit scoring models.  Experian offers various services and solutions to help financial institutions and lenders effectively implement reject inference into their decisioning strategy. Our solutions include comprehensive and high-quality datasets, which empower you to build models that are more representative of the entire applicant population. Additionally, our advanced analytics tools simplify data analysis and model development, enabling you to implement reject inference efficiently without extensive technical expertise.  Ready to elevate your underwriting process? Contact us today to learn more about our suite of advanced analytics solutions or hear what our experts have to say in this webinar.  Watch Webinar Learn More This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information. 

Quick Answer: A new consumer survey reveals that 90% of survey respondents would like to have more than one Vehicle History Report when shopping for a used car. Offering an Experian AutoCheck® VHR as a second Vehicle History Report is a smart, simple strategy to help you close more deals.   In today’s used car market, standing out from the crowd is more important than ever. As buyers become savvier and more informed, dealerships need to find new ways to build trust and close sales. One simple yet effective strategy? Offering a second Vehicle History Report (VHR) to your customers. Why VHRs Matter So Much Let’s face it—buying a car is a big deal. Most people don’t just walk onto a lot and pick the first car they see. They do their homework, and a big part of that research involves Vehicle History Reports. In fact, a recent survey found that 70% of people used a VHR the last time they bought a car. And it’s not just a one-time thing—83% of buyers say they’ll use a VHR for their next purchase too. Why? Because these reports provide crucial details like accident history, mileage accuracy, and service records that give buyers confidence in their decisions. The Case for Offering Multiple VHRs Here’s something that might surprise you: 90% of surveyed car buyers said they’d like to see more than one VHR when shopping for a used car. Think about that for a second. People want that extra layer of reassurance that only comes from cross-checking information. This is especially true for those who prefer buying from dealerships—these customers expect comprehensive, reliable data before they make a decision. How Multiple VHRs Can Give Your Dealership an Edge So, what’s the big deal about offering more than one VHR? It’s all about trust and transparency. Just like banks look at multiple credit reports before approving a loan, offering multiple VHRs can help you provide a fuller, more accurate picture of a vehicle’s history. This can reduce your liability and protect your dealership’s reputation. We have done some digging into this, and the results are eye-opening. For instance, in one case study, a dealership found additional damage events through an Experian AutoCheck® VHR that weren’t picked up by other VHRs. This kind of discrepancy shows just how valuable it can be to provide that second report—it helps ensure that all the facts are on the table, which protects both you and your customers. Meeting and Exceeding Customer Expectations Here’s something else to keep in mind: people expect dealerships to go the extra mile. The survey found that 86% of used car buyers believe VHRs should be provided for free by the dealership. By offering multiple reports at no additional cost, you’re not just meeting their expectations—you’re exceeding them. And that’s a surefire way to boost customer confidence, satisfaction, and, ultimately, your sales. What You Can Do Today Offering a second Vehicle History Report is a smart, simple strategy to help you close more deals. It shows your customers that you’re committed to transparency and that you care about providing them with all the information they need to make a confident decision. In a competitive market, it’s the little things like this that can make a big difference. Your customers—and your bottom line—will thank you. Experian Automotive is here to help you with your vehicle history data needs.  If you’d like to learn more about our AutoCheck solution and how we can support you, click below to have someone from our team contact you.