In this article…
Retail media is quickly outpacing other areas of digital advertising and is projected to grow 29% by 2025. Despite this trajectory, retail media is still relatively new compared to traditional digital media and operates like a startup in terms of tech capabilities. Sustained growth will require retail media standardization — creating consistent ways to measure and compare ad performance across retail media networks (RMNs). This standardization will be key for RMNs wanting to understand what’s driving the most value and sales for their business.
In an Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) study, 62% of ad buyers pointed to standardization as a top growth challenge. The current ecosystem’s inconsistent standards have prevented effective investment in measurement and limited ad buyer participation. Standardization will be necessary moving forward for effective adoption and trust in these new channels.
This article explores the challenges marketers face without retail media standardization and the collaborative efforts needed to establish consistent measurement standards across the industry.
How much standardization currently exists?
Retail media standardization is limited industry-wide, with each RMN using its own metrics and definitions; what one network calls a “conversion” might be defined differently by another. Some retail companies also sell ad space within siloed, walled-garden shopping environments, which makes it difficult for advertisers to compare performance across platforms. As a result, the current landscape lends itself to inconsistency, campaign measurement complications, and an unclear view of return on investment (ROI) across RMNs.
This fragmentation stems from how retailers have historically developed and managed customer data platforms and e-commerce websites independently, causing disparities in the types and quality of customer data available and the technologies used to manage it. Each retailer uses a unique technology stack and customer experience strategies, which means data is collected, utilized, and integrated into advertising platforms differently.
Why is standardization important?
A 2023 State of Retail Media Survey highlighted the industry’s lack of standardization as a significant obstacle to growth. The Association of National Advertisers also found that advertisers can’t fully take advantage of their retail media investments because of inconsistent measurement practices. Standardized retail media measurement practices are critical for growth. By setting consistent measurement standards across different platforms, it becomes easier for various players to:
- Assess how ads are performing
- See which strategies work across RMNs
- Optimize ad spending
- Make informed decisions
- Extract more value from advertising budgets
Ultimately, standardized metrics are a must for improving transparency, strategic effectiveness, and ROI.
Who is promoting standardization?
We’re seeing a collective push for retail media standardization by several industry stakeholders wanting a more cohesive and effective advertising ecosystem. One of the most recent efforts came from the IAB and the Media Rating Council (MRC). These organizations collaborated with brands, agencies, and RMNs to develop new guidelines for standardized measurement practices and have given the ecosystem a proposed common language for retail media measurement.
These guidelines were released in January 2024 to provide a consistent framework for the following across retail media platforms:
- Audience measurement
- Reporting
- Incrementality
- Transparency
- Viewability
- Ad delivery
- In-store advertising
Microsoft Retail Media, an early adopter of the framework, has experienced greater data transparency, accuracy, privacy, and security, which has benefited advertisers and retailers and advanced Microsoft’s position as a retail media industry leader. Widespread adoption of these guidelines has the potential to drive innovation, attract more advertisers, strengthen collaboration, grow the industry, and improve the consumer experience.
The benefits of industry standardization
A standardized retail media framework for performance measurement can benefit advertisers, retailers, media agencies, and other stakeholders in the ecosystem. Here are some ways each entity stands to benefit.
Benefits for retailers
Standardization makes it easier for retailers to demonstrate their credibility and the value of their retail media program. With uniform measurement across channels and campaigns, they can provide clear, comparable data that reflects their impact, builds trust, and encourages advertiser investment. Better campaign management efficiency also reduces the operational burden, so retailers can focus on improving customer experiences and driving sales.
Experian’s Activity Feed helps you measure performance — and understand how ads impact shopping behavior — by providing you with ad exposures in one environment (web or connected TV) that you can connect to an action in another (in-store purchase). Learn more about Activity Feed and see it in action here.
Benefits for media agencies and marketers
With standardized metrics, advertisers and media agencies have an easy, reliable way to compare metrics and assess the effectiveness of various campaigns across RMNs. This “apples to apples” comparison helps them determine which channels are truly driving better ROI so they can effectively optimize spending.
Standardization also improves collaboration with retailers and leads to more effective campaigns. Consistent guidelines can help teams create, carry out, and optimize retail media strategies and easily compare platform effectiveness.
Benefits for industry stakeholders
Industry stakeholders like technology providers and regulatory bodies can greatly benefit from standardized retail media measurement practices. Consistent measurement provides a common framework that improves transparency and trust among parties. With reliable and comparable metrics, standardization helps everyone speak the same language when it comes to performance evaluation and decision-making. This uniformity facilitates smoother interactions and partnerships between the buy and sell sides, so it’s easier to negotiate and collaborate.
Strategies for implementing retail media standardization
Standardizing measurement will require industry-wide coordination around several strategies, as outlined in best practices frameworks from standardization proponents like IAB/MRC and the Albertson’s Media Collective.
Unify reporting and performance measurement
To address the lack of standardization in performance metrics, RMNs must adopt uniform definitions and calculation methodologies for key metrics. Unified reporting in retail media requires successful stakeholder collaboration to:
- Agree on critical KPIs and reporting metrics like impressions and conversion rates
- Adopt standardized data formats and reporting tools
- Educate stakeholders
- Ensure data quality and compliance
- Continuously improve based on industry feedback
The IAB/MRC framework provides a basis for standardizing metrics for media delivery and engagement, as well as sales and conversions. This consistency helps advertisers compare performance across platforms effectively, enhancing transparency and decision-making.
Standardize product specifications
It’s important for advertisers to have consistent product specifications, as it makes it easier to create and deploy ads across multiple RMNs. To achieve this, RMNs should align ad formats, file sizes, animations, and video specifications with IAB guidelines. Following these standards will help RMNs eliminate compatibility issues, simplify adoption, and save time and resources. It’s also vital for RMNs to maintain flexibility for unique ad formats in order to encourage innovation while still benefiting from standardized specifications.
Introduce third-party verification and disclose capabilities
Introducing third-party verification for ad placement, fraud detection, brand safety, and competitive separation can improve an RMN’s credibility and transparency. By disclosing the third-party providers used and the types of verification offered, RMNs build trust with advertisers and give them the confidence they need to invest.
Additionally, RMNs should disclose their staffing, processes, technology, inventory management, targeting, creative management, and self-service offerings. Transparency in these areas helps advertisers make informed decisions, optimize ad buys, and increase efficiency. Using existing IAB verification and capability disclosure guidelines ensures reliability and a more trustworthy, efficient advertising environment.
Future retail media standardization trends
The future of retail media is poised for significant growth, especially as standardization guidelines are widely adopted and implemented. Here are some trends we expect to see as retail media ad spending grows.
Widespread RMN adoption and spending
Standardization could spur greater RMN spending and drive broad adoption by advertisers who hesitated before due to concerns about metrics and performance comparability.
New partnerships and collaborations
Standardization may lead to new partnerships that weren’t possible before:
- Brands and retailers might team up to blend advertising and sales data for better-targeted campaigns.
- AdTech companies could also partner with multiple retailers to offer unified advertising solutions.
- Retail media networks and analytics firms could collaborate to provide deep insights into consumer behavior and campaign performance.
- Partnerships among retailers, including smaller ones seeking retail media measurement uniformity, may drive further standardization and create new advertising opportunities across product categories with audience overlap.
Ad format innovation
Agreeing on common standards simplifies how ads are measured and understood. Standardization may drive down costs and free up space for more imaginative, engaging ads in the future. For instance, the IAB/MRC’s common language is helping to promote consistency and clarity and fuel innovation across the board.
Incrementality focus
As standardization becomes more widespread, there may be a growing trend toward incrementality measurement, which measures the additional impact of advertising campaigns compared to what would have happened without them. Standardized metrics can help advertisers accurately gauge and optimize campaign effectiveness and maximize their marketing investments.
Growth of cross-platform ad targeting
Standardization may drive the growth of cross-platform ad targeting. With consistent metrics and measurement standards, advertisers will be able to track and compare their ad performance across platforms more accurately. This unified approach will improve ad targeting precision and ensure a consistent impact across RMNs.
Commerce media
Commerce media is changing retail advertising with its focus on verified data and real-time transaction insights, making campaigns more efficient. This shift could push for more uniform measurement standards across platforms and level the playing field. As commerce media gains traction, its emphasis on targeted advertising and ROI measurement might pave the way for universal metrics and clearer guidelines across retail networks.
Where does this leave modern advertisers?
Retail media is still at a crossroads. If standardization doesn’t occur soon, its growth may slow. For now, advertisers are resorting to custom strategies or relying on whichever network they feel is most effective for their products. They are likely to continue investing significantly in retail media, maintaining or increasing spending in the next year.
Although RMNs continue to be challenging without formally recognized standardization guidelines, the proposed IAB/MRC guidelines provide an effective starting point.
Join forces with a strategic RMN partner
RMN success requires overcoming complicated technical hurdles that may exceed non-media business capacities. Managing data complexities, resolving identities, utilizing audience insights, and ensuring precise measurement requires specialized expertise and technologies.
We recently announced a solution tailored for RMNs. This offering enhances RMNs’ strength in first-party shopper data by using Experian’s #1 ranked identity and audience services. Our solution helps RMNs unlock expanded customer insights, enriched audiences for activation, identity resolution for cross-channel audience targeting, and real-time measurement and attribution. This comprehensive solution is designed to help RMNs capture more advertising revenue.
If your organization could benefit from a partner with the requisite technological tools and insights into the retail media landscape, contact us to discover how we can help you achieve RMN success.
Latest posts
On April 22nd, Americans and many of their terrestrial counterparts in countries around the world will celebrate Earth Day, a tradition that was started in the United States by Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson in 1970. Much has changed on the planet since the first Earth Day, and even in recent years attitudes continue to evolve when it comes to our outlook towards the environment. In 2007, Experian Simmons created the GreenAware consumer segmentation, which classified respondents to the Simmons National Consumer Study between 2005 until 2007 into one of four mutually exclusive segments based on their consumer behaviors and attitudes toward the environment. Since then, Experian Simmons has continuously classified all adult respondents into the GreenAware segments providing our clients with valuable insights into the evolution of the environmental movement. The four GreenAware segments are: Behavioral Greens: This group of people thinks and acts green. They have negative attitudes towards products that pollute and incorporate green practices into their lives on a regular basis. Think Greens: This group of consumers think green, but don’t always act green. Potential Greens: This group neither behaves, nor thinks along particularly environmentally conscious lines and remains on the fence about key green issues. True Browns: They are not environmentally conscious, and may in fact have negative attitudes about environmental issues. Since 2005, we have observed a nearly constant increase in the percent of U.S. adults who are classified as Behavioral Greens, the “greenest” segment of the four. Today, 33% of adults are Behavioral Greens, up from 27% who were classified as such in 2005. Meantime, Think Greens have maintained an almost perfectly constant 21% share of the population. The size of the True Browns segment has also remained constant at between 14% and 15% of the total adult population. The Potential Green segment, however, has steadily declined in market share from 39% in 2005 to 31% today. La Vida Verde Hispanic Americans have traditionally been ahead of the curve when it comes to green thoughts and deeds and they’re only getting greener with time. Today, 39% of Hispanic adults are Behavioral Greens, up from 33% in 2007. Just 32% of non-Hispanic adults are Behavioral Greens today, up from 29% who fell into the greenest segment in 2007. Interestingly, among the True Browns segment there are virtually no Hispanics to be found, and, in fact, while the True Brown population is actually growing among non-Hispanics, Hispanics are increasingly moving to greener segments. Specifically, just 1.3% of Hispanics are True Browns today, down from 8% who registered as such in 2007. By comparison, 17% of non-Hispanics are True Browns today, up from 14% in 2007. Green Today, Greener Tomorrow? The illustration below shows the alignment of America’s largest metropolitan areas with the four GreenAware segments today and in 2007. We see that residents of the San Francisco-, New York- and Miami-areas are the most likely to be in alignment with the Behavioral Green mindset today. Denizens of Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia and Boston tend to fit more closely with the Think Green set that has green attitudes and intentions, but not always the actions to back it up. But things are changing. In fact, since 2007, we’ve seen that as local minds change, some cities become aligned with a different, often greener, segment. Let’s look at Chicago, for instance. In 2007, Chicagoans’ environmental outlook was more reflective of a mix of Potential Greens and True Browns. Since then, local attitudes have changed so much that Chicago-area residents are now more aligned with Think Greens and Behavioral Greens. Likewise, Cleveland, which was clearly a True Brown town in 2007, now falls in step with the Potential Green segment. In five years’ time, who knows? Cleveland could be America’s next green leader. Not brown now towns Looking at markets large and small with the biggest drop in concentration of True Browns, we see that attitudes in inland markets located in Gulf States have become disproportionately less brown since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. In fact, seven of the ten Designated Market Areas (DMA) that saw the biggest decline in the percentage of their population classified as True Browns between 2007 and 2011 are inland markets in states bordering the Gulf of Mexico. While the oil didn’t directly reach these markets, the attitude change did spread: For example, 3.2% of adults residing in the Columbus-Tupelo-West Point, Mississippi DMA today are classified as True Browns, down from 19.3% who were categorized as such in 2007. In Macon, Georgia, while not a Gulf State, a more impressive shift took place. In 2007, the Macon, Georgia DMA had the fourth highest percentage of its population classified as True Browns (20.1%) out of 209 DMAs. Today, only 5.8% of area residents are True Browns, which makes it the market with the 10th lowest concentrations of True Browns in the nation. Macon still has one of the lowest shares of residents who are Behavioral Greens in the nation, but what a difference a few years makes. While the towns directly in the path of the oil spill are not among those with the biggest relative decline in True Browns, area residents’ attitudes did take on a greener hue since the spill. Today, 8.4% of residents in Panama City are True Browns down from 17.3% in 2007. Likewise, only 9.8% of adults in both the Mobile-Pensacola and Biloxi Gulfport DMAs are True Browns down from 17.3% and 19.0%, respectively, who fell into the least green segment prior to the spill. Learn more about Experian Simmons consumer segmentation offerings
As sure as the sun rises and sets, Tax Day comes around every year, whether it falls on April 15th or a day or two thereafter. As part of the Simmons National Consumer Study, Experian Simmons collects information on the various ways Americans file their taxes. In the following post, we will explore a few tax trends in the Land of the Free as well as some deductions available to many. Software for the Hard Stuff Long gone are the days of preparing our taxes the old-fashioned way using pen and paper (and hopefully a calculator). Last year, just 8.7% of U.S. tax filers prepared their taxes manually, down from 16.4% of filers who prepared their taxes this way in 2006. Software (including both online and offline versions, such as Turbo Tax or H&R Block At Home) have risen to replace their graphite-powered ancestors. In 2005, 21.5% of tax filers said they used software to prepare their taxes. Specifically, 6.8% used offline software and another 14.7% used online software. Today, 21.5% of filers use online tax software and 7.4% use offline software, bringing the total share of software preparers to 28.9%. But tax software isn’t just replacing at-home pencil pushers. The share of filers using a CPA, a private accountant or a notary public to prepare their taxes has also declined slightly in recent years as has the share of filers that use a professional on-site service, like H&R Block of Jackson Hewitt. In 2011, 30.8% of filers had their taxes prepared by a CPA, private accountant or notary, down from 32.9% who employed this type of professional in 2006. Likewise, 17.7% of last year’s filers used a professional on-site service to prepare their taxes, compared with 19% who used such a service in 2006. Filing Trends of Business Owners Much attention in Washington has been paid to small business owners, especially when the topic of tax policy is concerned. Rest assured, we’re not going to explore the political implications of proposed tax code changes on business owners, but we will examine the way these Americans prepare their personal taxes. A business owner’s tax prep work depends a lot on how many employees they have working for them. Those who own very small companies with between 2 and 9 employees, including the owner, are the most likely to have a CPA, private accountant or notary prepare their taxes. In fact, 65% of these small business owners do their taxes this way, compared with 52% of those who own companies with between 10 and 99 employees. Interestingly, only 35% of tax filers who own companies with 100 employees or more use a CPA, a private accountant or a notary to prepare their taxes, a rate equal to that of the national average. Larger business owners are actually more likely than average to have their taxes done by an on-site professional. While few business owners do their taxed by hand, the self-employed who have no employees are actually among the few that still do their taxes the old-fashioned way. In fact, 11% of business owners who list only themselves as employees say they did their taxes manually last year, a rate 30% above than the U.S. average. Most of those who don’t to their taxes themselves have them done by a CPA, a private accountant or a notary. Fifty-two percent of the self-employed with no other employees chose this method to prepare their taxes last year, which is a rate 45% higher than the average filer. Deduction Time Deductions are a common way for reducing one’s tax liability. Here we’ll explore how many Americans could benefit from several common deductions allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. For more information about consumer trends, visit www.experian.com/simmons.
Yesterday, Facebook announced the acquisition of Instagram, a popular photo sharing network with over 30 million users, for $1 billion. Visits to the Instagram website have steadily increased over the past 24 weeks and reached 3.8 million last week, up from 68,800 visits for the week ending October 22, 2012. While the majority of activity takes place within the Instagram application, the website provides links to the Apple App Store and Google Play as well as some account management tools, so the growth marks increased consumer interest. The audience for Instagram is relatively young, with over half of the visitors to the Instagram website are under the age of 35. This is an interesting contrast to the visitors of Facebook’s website, which reflects a more mainstream audience with a higher share of older users. These differences can certainly offer opportunities to promote and grow usage of each of the networks across age groups. Many users of Instagram share their photos across a number of social networks since within the Instagram application, you can link to your share photos with Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, Tumblr, Posterous (recently acquired by Twitter) and Foursquare accounts. As a result of this integration and heavy use of social networks in general, social networks refer the majority of traffic to the Instagram website. Last week, 25% of the traffic to Instagram from social networks was from new visitors, most likely interested in learning more about Instagram after seeing photos within the feeds of their friends. Last week, there was considerable excitement around the launch of Instagram app for Android phones, which became available on Google’s recently relaunched digital media store, Google Play. The app reached over 1 million downloads on the first day of availability. Visits to the Instagram website increased 59% over the previous week and Google Play ranked 6th among the downstream websites visited immediately after the Instagram website. Please note this data does not include mobile traffic.