aag & misc test

There’s no doubt that identity theft is a concern for any industry that handles sensitive customer information; health care is no exception. In 2017 alone, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reported 477 healthcare breaches. Together, they compromised nearly 5.6 million patient records. Without adequate IT security, everything that organizations use to improve patient engagement and the continuum of care – especially patient portals – becomes an open door for hackers. But how do we keep patient data secure without burdening patients? We asked Victoria Dames, Experian’s senior director of identity management, how the healthcare industry is evolving to solve for identity theft, as well as best practices all healthcare organizations can adopt to better meet this growing threat. In the world of healthcare, both patients and providers are understandably hyper-sensitive about the exchange and security of healthcare data. How is the industry arming itself to protect data? Are there any shifts you’ve witnessed in security practices over the past few years? Absolutely! The industry has quickly evolved into leveraging technology to share data between organizations and with their patients, but this does bring inherit risk. Criminals also took notice to this shift, and medical identity theft became one of the fastest growing types of identity theft with a roughly 22 percent annual growth. With this evolution, the industry has tightened up on data access, especially as it pertains to the patient. Over the last five years, we’ve seen the shift to enable technology to help identity-proof patients before granting them access to sensitive information. This used to be a manual process. What are some of the best practices healthcare organizations can adopt to limit instances of medical identity theft? First, organizations must understand where their access points are throughout their ecosystems. With 64 percent of patients citing a privacy issue as a key concern for accessing health information online, they should inform patients that they’re providing secure methods for access to their information. Additionally, healthcare organizations must evaluate how physicians access different types of data and portals. As healthcare caught up to electronic records and systems, portals for e-prescribing also arrived. Given the nature of this use case, providing a heightened NIST level of identity proofing is required. The key is to assess what level of identity proofing is needed at each entry point to keep balance on security and the end-user experience. When you look to the future of healthcare, what types of digital technologies and solutions do you see providers putting in place to prevent fraud and protect patient data? Technology moves quickly and so do we. Identity proofing has seen an acceleration in the use of biometrics at different points of entry throughout healthcare organizations, which strengthens our solution. We are starting to see the use of biometrics, similar to your phone face ID, used more broadly through healthcare in conjunction with existing identity-proofing solutions. Experian achieved the Kantara Initiative certification with adherence to the latest guidelines achieving NIST 800-63-3 IAL2 (National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication Digital Identity Guidelines 800-63-3 for Identity Assurance Level 2 (IAL2)). This reinforces our commitment to support clients in authenticating consumers, while balancing a positive experience. Learn more about Experian’s identity management solutions.

It's no secret that claim denials cost healthcare organizations. They take about 16 more days to pay out than claims that have not been denied. On average, this delay in payment equates to one percent of a healthcare organization’s cost structure.   Final claim denials — or claims in which the payer never pays the provider — lowers a typical hospital’s annual net revenue by 1.9 percent. These tack on additional administrative costs because of the work it takes to close them.   The good news is that 76 percent of claim denials are eventually paid off — but the staff time it takes to get the payments can be costly.   Claims roadblocks   Experian Health recently worked with a large healthcare organization that manages more than 200,000 claims per month, which exceeds $1 billion in claims dollars. The organization has almost 50 hospitals in its network, as well as urgent care and cancer care centers, which creates a large number of transactions and claims to process. This includes Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, worker's compensation, managed care, and more.   Before partnering with Experian Health, a number of errors were leading to denied claims, including discharge-not-final-billed errors, claims errors, stop bills, late charges, clearinghouse edits, and other factors that created roadblocks. But claims automation helped turn things around.   Automation reduces errors   Automation provides benefits to healthcare organizations and patients because it speeds up evaluation, ensures correct and timely billing, and reduces the number of manual touches needed for each claim.   According to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare, manual processes slow down claim reimbursement. People take an average of four minutes to process claims, but automation reduces this to three minutes.   Although a minute doesn't sound like much, it translates to thousands of hours saved for a healthcare organization that processes 200,000 claims each month. Automation also frees up time for billing teams to focus on more pressing tasks.   How organizations can benefit   By automating, this healthcare organization could ensure clean claims by utilizing an expansive library of national payer edits and implementing custom edits. This eased the follow-up process because teams had detailed insight into claims status, an analysis of denial reasons to efficiently process them, and automated workflow and payment posting to handle splits and contractual adjustments.   One of the biggest reasons this healthcare organization partnered with Experian Health was the ease of implementation with its medical records system, Epic. For example, ClaimSource easily loaded customized edits and the edits library into Epic, tracked and corrected claims, found and repaired issues with the system build, and created opportunities for cross-training and centralized reporting.   Long-lasting results   Through this automated process, the healthcare organization now has detailed insight into its claims management process and can monitor rejections data, review effectiveness, and find ideas for even more system automation.   Through its partnership with Experian Health, this healthcare organization has improved its claims metrics across the board. It improved its acceptance rate by 10 percent, and it became an Epic top performer for claims acceptance, averaging a 99 percent acceptance rate. It has also increased its clean, paid claims percentage by over 10 percent.   Start automating to streamline your claims process.

Chalk it up to the rise of high-deductible plans or decreasing payer reimbursements, but the numbers don’t lie: patients are footing more of their healthcare bills and hospitals are struggling to collect. In fact, a recent TripleTree report revealed there has been a 69 percent increase in consumer payments due to providers over the past four years. That same report also noted providers collect only 1/3 of patient balances larger than $200, with the balance being sent to collections or written off as bad debt. All this to say … collections can make or break a hospital. So, how are hospitals compromising on their collections game? Let us count the ways: 1. They treat all patients the same. Some patients may be able to cover all their care costs up front, while others need to spread out payments, or perhaps get help from a lender or charity. Logical, right? But for some reason, many hospitals take a one-size-fits-all-approach to their collections work. They’ll simply submit the bill, wait for payment and see what happens. If payment fails to come in after repeated attempts, they send the account to collections, and the agency often takes a similar approach. Scoring and segmenting patient accounts based on who has the propensity to pay –and directing them to the in-house or outsourced team most likely to collect – is a much more productive collections strategy. Even better, providers should try to determine what patients owe before a procedure, and reveal payment plan options from the start. By developing a means to estimate the cost of a patient's care, providers can deliver a figure to target for pre-operative, pre-procedure collection. 2. They lack an agency strategy. Just as hospitals can take one-size-fits-all approach with their patient collections, so too can be the case with their collections agencies. Some hospitals find themselves struggling with how to reconcile accounts placed with their agencies. Others are unhappy with their early- or late-stage collections vendor, but can’t quite pinpoint where it’s all going wrong. Advocate Aurora Healthcare, an operation with 27 hospitals and 500 outpatient locations, was trying to oversee 20 different collections agencies just a few years ago. They wanted to reduce the number of agencies doing their collections work, and gain a clearer understanding of who was performing best, but they lacked the data insights to evaluate. By tapping into a collections optimization platform, Advocate Aurora was able to reduce their agencies from 20 to four, and they started seeing double-digit increases in their patient collections. Routing accounts to the optimal collections resources, and using collection agencies judiciously, minimized their collection costs, and helped them stay focused on patients who can and will pay. 3. They rely on limited data sources. To create a truly effective collections strategy that is both predictive and insightful, hospitals need to rely on data sources that offer breadth and depth. Let’s consider an example. In the credit world, financial services companies can be looking at two consumers with identical credit scores and come to the conclusion that they should treat each the same. But with more data insights, a lender might see that one is trending up, making on-time payments that exceed the minimum balance, and the other is trending down, showing signs of payment distress. With historical data and other insights, the financial lender would likely treat each of those individuals differently. Agree? The same scenario can unfold in the healthcare space. If providers are solely looking at zip code data, or historical healthcare data, they will be challenged to offer personalized payment plans and decisions around how best to collect. Combining various data sources, including credit data, can provide hospitals with deeper insights into a patient’s propensity to pay and financial disposition. This allows healthcare organizations to identify the best financial pathway for each patient at, or before, the time of service, and will ultimately optimize their account receivable performance as well. — By flipping the switch on a few of these strategies, hospitals can turn their patient collections game around. They’ll see gains in patient satisfaction, improvement in the accounts receivable bucket and the power data can have on segmentation. There’s really no excuse to fail.

The healthcare industry is starting to embrace the use of consumer data to help achieve better treatment outcomes, engage patients in meaningful ways, market to health consumers, and identify social determinants of health among their patient population. As consumers now spend an estimated $3.5 trillion annually on healthcare in the U.S. (approximately $10,348 per consumer), they expect the healthcare industry to create modern and innovative experiences for their care journey. Those experiences can only be created through data-driven insights. When it comes to the world of data, where can we start? What if we could use health data and other variables like socioeconomics to predict missed appointments, noncompliance with medications, and patient trajectory over time? By learning how to apply data analytics to practice management workflows, we will improve the delivery of patient care by zeroing in on the best in social determinants of health. Data insights can also forge stronger customer and patient relationships, foster brand loyalty, and drive decisions around how to interact with consumers in ways that consider their lifestyles, attitudes and preferences. Those insights help deliver tailored messages to patients that are relevant to every stage of their journey. And what about applying credit data to create a personalized, nearly invisible, payment experience for patients? As patients express that paying their bill is a top pain point in their health journey, we look to use the right data insights to fuel collection strategies by offering patients financial assistance and payment plans at the point of service to ensure a positive patient financial experience. The right data can transform patient and consumer experiences in healthcare. However, it’s important to have access to clean, original-source data, as well as analytics to gain insights that drive decisions and achieve results. Household data, marketing data, credit data and of course healthcare data can all offer a more complete view of today’s healthcare consumer. If you are attending HIMSS19, join us in booth 2033 to hear one of our presentations on using data in the patient experience to earn CE credits.  

Healthcare runs on revenue, and claims denials can put a big dent into the budgets of healthcare providers — between 5 and 10 percent of claims submitted by healthcare providers are denied. This adds up to billions ­of lost dollars each year for providers in the U.S.   The good news? Ninety percent of claims denials are preventable when healthcare providers automate revenue cycle functions. In fact, providers could gain an estimated $9.5 billion by automating the claims management processes. And money isn’t the only thing to be saved — companies could also have more time to work on other processes.   The problems facing one Oregon healthcare provider   Monitoring claims and cash flow is difficult for any healthcare organization, as the staff at Summit Medical Group Oregon — Bend Memorial Clinic (BMC) knows. Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC found its team consistently waiting for payer response, which often forced its overall operations to drag.   After 30 to 45 days of submitting claims, if Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC did not receive payment, staff members would have to reach out to payers to determine whether they had received the claim. They also had to determine whether the claim was in the process of adjudication, as well as any other steps the staff should take in order to get the claim processed, according to Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC business analyst Sean Schlappy.   These manual processes not only create lags in claims reimbursements, but also take up a lot of staff time. The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare found that processing claims manually takes an average of four minutes, while processing automated payments takes an average of three minutes. So Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC decided to implement software solutions to improve acceptance rates.   The tools used for improvement   One product Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC implemented was Claim Scrubber, which ensures all claims submitted are accurate before they're sent to the payer. Because it can be integrated with most practice management systems, this service allows employees to set up notifications in the healthcare provider's work queue. It also provides detailed dashboards and reports to quickly recognize trends to improve medical coding and reimbursement rates.   Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC additionally turned to Enhanced Claim Status, which provides employees with status requests based on the payer’s adjudication time frame, improves productivity, and ensures timely and accurate payments. This tool reduces the amount of time staff members must spend interacting with the payer, and it generates work lists of claims with actionable data.   By transitioning most of its coverage information upstream, Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC was able to obtain more accurate data during the initial patient introduction and registration. Using this technology, Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC also improved the patient experience.   Using technology for clean claims   After implementing Enhanced Claim Status in conjunction with other services from Experian Health, Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC gained a 15 percent reduction in accounts receivable days and volume. And the healthcare organization now has a 92 percent primary clean claims rate, and its claims denial rate has dropped to 7 percent.   Integrating several tools is helping Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC in the long term, Schlappy says. Summit Medical Group Oregon – BMC has increased payment processing and reduced claims denials, and, most importantly, it's producing cleaner charges.

As of January 1, 2019, thousands of hospitals in the U.S. are being required to post an online list of the cost of their services due to a new requirement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). However, amid growing confusion about which fields are required or what format the list of standard services needs to be in, many health systems feel this new law will only create confusion among patients. One health system described the new requirements as, “It would be like walking into a car dealership looking at a new car, asking the salesman how much the car was going to cost and having them hand you the parts catalog. Obviously, when you have the parts catalog, you don't know what parts are in your car or which ones you're going to use or how much labor is going to go into making the car." While posting the list of prices is required by CMS, some health systems have invested in the needed technology to make it easy for patients to shop online for care. For example, in an interview with Modern Healthcare, El Camino Hospital explains they “launched a consumer self-service tool in May 2017, after about a year of development work with Experian Health. Since then, more than 3,000 people have visited the hospital's website, selected one or more of about 90 medical or surgical services they were interested in, entered their insurance information, and received an instant out-of-pocket cost estimate the hospital claims is 95% to 99% accurate.” Health systems like El Camino Hospital know that patients want to avoid costly surprises, and they should be able to understand their financial obligations upfront, including deductibles and copays. In fact, McKinsey research found nearly three-quarters of participants were worried about healthcare expenditures. Legislative help The new CMS requirement is only one of a few initiatives in the works from a legislative standpoint. In an effort to help patients, some members of Congress are trying to bring attention to the topic. A bipartisan group of U.S. senators in 2018 wrote a letter to healthcare stakeholders and experts requesting information in an effort to learn more about price transparency as they considered possible legislation on the matter. Also in the letter, the senators cited the lack of state laws and regulations requiring healthcare providers to make that information available to patients. More than 40 states were cited by the Catalyst for Payment Reform and the Health Care Incentives Improvement Initiative in 2016 because they were deficient in healthcare transparency legislation. And that same report found that some patients were paying thousands of dollars more than others for the same procedures, depending which healthcare provider they used. Alleviating patient stress Transparency in billing creates more satisfied patients because they know how much they will be paying for services, which makes it easier for them to budget. Going to the hospital is usually a stressful time for patients and their families. An easy way for healthcare providers to alleviate that stress is to help patients understand their costs upfront Most healthcare organizations already have the basic data they need to use automated technology to construct estimates for basic services, including claims data, real-time eligibility and benefits information, payer contracts and charge description master (CDM) information. Experian Health has the technology to help healthcare organizations convert this information into patient costs through Patient Estimates. This kind of transparency provides several benefits to both providers and patients. Online estimates published on healthcare provider websites give patients access to the information any time, including late at night and on weekends. And these estimates can be obtained confidentially, so patients who may be uncomfortable asking about certain procedures can find that information on their own. And that helps them be more relaxed about making appointments and scheduling treatments because they have confidence they won't face billing surprises. This feel-better result of having prices at their fingertips has a clear benefit for the healthcare providers as well. Patients are able to plan and pay for services, decreasing unpaid balances for hospitals and other healthcare providers. Ability to budget for healthcare costs Patients who know what to expect can budget wisely and actively take charge of their healthcare bills. They go in with their eyes open, which leads to improved revenue cycle management. In the end, both the patient and the hospital get what they want. With Congress and state legislatures looking at transparency in healthcare, providers can expect to see more of these rules. Healthcare organizations can get ahead of them with software like Experian Health's Patient Estimates. Healthcare consumers don't like surprises in their billing. Price transparency gives them the information and peace of mind they need to secure healthcare services and be assured that they know what they will be paying for them. Learn more about how Experian Health can help you achieve price transparency for your patients.