First Pst after migration to Cloud in Health care Blog

The No Surprises Act, effective Jan. 1, 2022, requires that healthcare providers include a “Good Faith Estimate” that covers all relevant codes and charges. This was established to increase price transparency for patients. For a summary of the No Surprises Act, read our previous blog. In our recent webinar, hosted on December 15, 2021, industry expert Stanley Nachimson, principal of Nachimson Advisors*, answered our audience’s most pressing questions about “Good Faith Estimates.”** To read the FAQs from our first webinar, click here. Experian Health can help your healthcare organization navigate the regulatory landscape  and implement solutions ranging from transparent, patient-friendly estimates to our all-new FREE No Surprises Act (NSA) Payer Alerts Portal.  Here’s what Nachimson had to say: Q1: What are the top things to do now to prepare for the No Surprises Act by Jan. 1? SN: Set up processes to avoid out-of-network billing for emergency and in-network facility services Out-of-network providers need to make sure they have the right processes set up to avoid surprise billing patients. Evaluate in-and-out of network status for all providers Implement Good Faith Estimate for Uninsured/Self Pay from a single provider Make sure to have a process in place for self-pay or uninsured patients Prepare patient notice documents Train staff and ensure they’re aware of new rules and changes Q2: What must be included in the Good Faith Estimate starting 1/1/22? SN: Starting Jan 1, 2022, the only Good Faith Estimates required are for “self-pay” or uninsured patients. These are the only ones that will be enforced/mandated on January 1st. CMS has created forms that show what GFEs should include. This includes individual services that will be provided in an encounter, line-item descriptions of services, procedure codes, diagnosis codes, and more. Estimates should be within $400 of the final bill for any provider or facility that was included, assuming there are no extenuating circumstances. Q3: How should providers deliver the Good Faith Estimate to the patient? Payers? SN: For patients, Good Faith Estimates should be delivered in a written document. This can be done through email, USPS, or delivered in person. Currently, providers do not need to worry about sending anything to payers. Regulators put this requirement on indefinite hold until they have more clarity on the technical delivery/transition of this data. CMS expects to provide a ruling clarification on this in 2022. Experian Health is now offering a FREE comprehensive, updated list of No Surprises Act (NSA) payer policy alerts for United States hospitals, medical groups, and specialty healthcare service organizations. Q4: What are the differences between Insured & Self-Pay Good Faith Estimates that providers should consider starting Jan. 1? SN: There will probably be no significant difference in the GFEs for self-pay vs insured individuals. However, the GFEs will be sent to health plans for the insured individuals. At this point, there is no standard electronic delivery method. Individual providers/organizations may come up with their own paper or electronic form, assuming it contains all the required information. At some point in the future, the GFEs will be sent to health plans for insured patients, and that will most likely be a standard transaction. CMS is currently waiting on guidelines for what this transaction will look like. Q5: How does an estimate get calculated when there are multiple providers involved? Who is the “convening provider?” SN: A convening provider is the provider that (1) is responsible for scheduling the primary item or service(defined as “the initial reason for the visit”), or (2) receives a request from an individual shopping for an item or service)—must determine at the time an item or service is scheduled or when a patient is shopping for care whether the patient is a self-pay patient, as defined above. This will not be enforced on Jan. 1, 2022. In 2022, each provider will be expected to provide the GFE for their own services. Because there aren’t any processes in place, the healthcare industry will have at least 1 year to develop a standard guideline for gathering this information. The requirement that the convening provider combines all provider GFEs into one GFE will not be enforced until 2023.This means that over the course of 2022, the convening provider will not be required to include estimates from other providers.  The industry will need to create a standard guideline and establish communication processes first. Until then, patients will need to ask every provider involved for a Good Faith Estimate.  Providers may wish to consider how they will accomplish this during 2022. Q6: Does the Good Faith Estimate apply to all services – even office visits? Labs? Urgent care? Drop-ins? SN: It applies to all types of services. However, depending on when the service is scheduled, the timeframe will vary on when the Good Faith Estimate can be sent out. Q7: If the actual charges are more than $400 greater than the Good Faith Estimate, what consequences will be there for providers starting Jan. 1? SN: The latest rule established an independent dispute resolution process.  The patient must initiate the process within 120 days of receiving the bill, file the required documentation and pay a $25 administrative fee. Webinar Series: Unpacking The No Surprises Act and Q&A with an expert Industry expert Stanley Nachimson, Health IT Implementation Expert, recently hosted a series of webinars to help providers get up to speed on what they need to do to comply with the No Surprises Act. Learn about the Good Faith Estimate, how NSA will apply in different care settings, and more. *Stanley Nachimson is not an employee or representative of Experian Health. **The scope and details of the No Surprises Act are evolving. The information provided here is up to date as of December 23, 2021. This content is intended for information and education purposes only.  Experian Health cannot and does not provide legal and compliance guidance.  It is recommended that all organizations review the regulation thoroughly and seek appropriate legal and compliance guidance to determine an appropriate strategy for compliance. Experian Health offers solutions across the healthcare journey – including patient engagement, revenue cycle management, identity management, care management and analytics – that may contribute to meeting compliance requirements.  

The recent discovery of the Omicron variant has placed the world on high alert. As COVID-19 continues to transform and evolve, erupting as “new” pandemics within the existing pandemic,  it is becoming clear that digitally-enabled clinical care and access to that care are some of the world’s tools to mitigate its spread. Should infection rates rise, providers can anticipate fluctuations in patient volumes, which may trigger a return to the scheduling complexities seen earlier in the pandemic. Streamlining patient access with digital scheduling to minimize wait times, free up hospital beds, and ensure efficient intake workflows is going to be crucial. New variants could also exacerbate existing healthcare staffing shortages, which is a major concern for providers whose capacity is already at a “tipping point.” With a winter flu season “twindemic” looming on the horizon, and more people traveling over the holidays, this challenge may only get tougher. One route through this uncertainty is to continue the digital pivot seen in the early days of the pandemic. Here, we look at how flexible self-scheduling tools and other digital services can continue to help providers maintain operational efficiency as they navigate the implications of this new coronavirus strain. Uncertainty about Omicron – and future variants –  could trigger patient scheduling complexities The new variant could trigger a rise in patient numbers, as seen with the Delta variant. In parallel, some providers and states may follow New York’s lead to try to manage non-urgent care and postpone certain elective treatments. Patients, too, may decide to hold off on booking appointments if they’re worried about contracting the virus while visiting their doctor. This means that the scheduling (and rescheduling) challenges seen throughout the pandemic could resurface. Providers should be ready to offer easy and convenient self-scheduling options. Digital patient scheduling platforms allow patients to book essential care and reschedule deferred appointments from the comfort of their own home, using whatever channel suits them best. Not only will this ease pressure on busy staff and reduce the number of people sitting side-by-side in doctors’ waiting rooms, but it’s also a quicker and more reliable way for patients to plan their care. Providers can augment these operational efficiencies with digital scheduling and registration tools. Registration Accelerator can reduce the burden on patient access teams by allowing patients to create user profiles and fill out pre-treatment information from home. Double down on convenient vaccination scheduling New variant outbreaks also add a layer of urgency and complexity to the ongoing vaccination program. Boosting the country’s vaccination rates is a crucial defense against existing strains of COVID-19. Patient-friendly digital scheduling tools can make it as easy as possible for people to arrange an appointment, thus helping to bump up vaccination rates. Of course, if more people are encouraged to seek vaccinations and boosters, the scheduling process could get even more complicated. Again, digital self-scheduling tools can ease the pressure, by using real-time databases and automation to ensure that patients book appointments within the requisite vaccination window. Automation can also be used to deliver personalized patient outreach reminders, nudging patients to schedule their vaccine appointment if they haven’t made one already. Comprehensive consumer data can help identify the most appropriate messages and channels for different patients, to make it as easy as possible for them to plan and book their appointment. The federal response to new outbreaks has included provisions for vaccine outreach campaigns and education initiatives. Providers should consider how their own outreach campaigns are performing, as well as ensure that their scheduling platforms are ready to meet the increase in demand that’s likely to follow. Automation and digital scheduling tools could help alleviate staffing shortages Behind the scenes, providers are still wrangling with ongoing staffing shortages. According to an analysis of US Bureau of Labor Statistics data, hospital employment declined by nearly 100,000 between February 2020 and September 2021, amounting to a financial cost of around $24 billion. New variants could make this worse. If more staff are infected, healthcare organizations may find it more difficult to handle the increase in patient volume. Automating manual tasks can free up capacity by helping to manage the growing demand for services and reduce call volumes. These automated tools and systems are designed to be user-friendly for busy staff, and for patients looking for a stress-free patient access experience. With streamlined self-scheduling options and more efficient staff workflows, providers can feel more prepared in the face of uncertainty. Contact Experian Health to find out more about how digital scheduling tools can help your organization prepare as the Omicron situation unfolds.

Healthcare providers could be losing up to $265 billion each year on avoidable administration costs. A recent investigation by the Washington Post and McKinsey & Company found expensive inefficiencies in several areas of healthcare expenditure, with financial transactions such as prior authorizations among the main culprits. How can healthcare organizations adjust to streamlining prior authorizations? Prior authorizations (or pre-authorizations) are intended to provide financial certainty to patients and providers, by confirming in advance that a payer will cover the cost of a particular test or treatment. However, securing pre-approval isn’t always a tidy process. The criteria are complicated and frequently change. In April this year, the American Medical Association reported that 85% of physicians found the burden associated with prior authorizations to be very high. The consequences are severe – hold-ups and errors can lead to delayed care, poorer outcomes for patients, and more unnecessary costs for providers. Securing pre-authorizations has always been challenging, but as with many healthcare operations, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the problem. Experian Health’s State of Patient Access 2.0 survey revealed that more than half of providers find it difficult to keep track of changing pre-authorization requirements. Two-thirds expect to encounter roadblocks when seeking authorizations for rescheduled elective procedures. In fact, prior authorizations have overtaken patient payments as the biggest area of concern when it comes to collections and reimbursements. In our "Interview with the Expert,” Ellie Henry, Experian Health’s VP of Implementation, discusses the challenges around pre-authorizations and offers some immediate actions healthcare providers can take in response. Watch the interview below: Why are providers increasingly concerned about pre-authorizations? Pre-authorizations have been a hot topic for a while, but Experian Health’s State of Patient Access surveys, taken six months apart in November 2020 and June 2021, show a significant increase in provider concerns. Is this purely down to the “pandemic effect,” or is there more to it? Henry suggests that while the pandemic has been the main driver of recent authorization challenges, manual processes and changing payer rules have played a major role, too: “Hospitals had to restructure operations during the pandemic, which led to a lot of care being rescheduled. But it wasn’t always clear if existing authorizations would apply to that rescheduled care, which led to more reworking. Payers were continuing to adjust their rules, and understaffed organizations had to do more with less, which made it even harder to function effectively.” Many states also released their own pre-authorization requirements. For example, in September 2021, New York released an executive order to suspend prior authorizations for 30 days. While this may have been intended to ease pressure on staff and accelerate patient care, it also raised numerous questions. Providers had to determine if preapproval was needed for care that was planned during these 30 days or deferred until later and whether these changes overruled national payers’ requirements. How should providers address current pre-authorizations challenges? Henry says that providers can mitigate these challenges and focus on streamlining prior authorizations by dedicating limited resources to the most important problems first. This means using technology and automation to alleviate pressures on staff: “Providers need to streamline hand-offs and eliminate accounts that don’t need to be touched. With the right automation and technology, you can eliminate manual work and optimize workflows to manage demand. No matter how good you are, there’s always room to improve.” The growing administrative burden, exacerbated by increasing patient volumes, is an uncomfortable equation for healthcare organizations with reduced workforces. The traditional methods for managing patient accounts and checking for changes in payer policies are no longer sufficient. Instead, providers should look to automated prior authorization solutions that can ease the strain and ensure that more accounts are processed faster and more accurately. These should encompass both back-end automation and patient-facing digital tools that support self-service and reduce call volumes. What new opportunities lie ahead for streamlining prior authorizations? In the longer term, patient volumes will continue to increase as rescheduled care ramps up, and as patients begin to think about healthcare “maintenance” again. Providers have several options available to them to manage the pre-authorizations that will follow suit. Henry suggests that a good starting point is to invest in the right technology: “Technology can reduce manual tasks and keep the process manageable. The more tasks you can streamline and automatically update within your system, the better. Reach out to technology vendors and ask if their tools can help to make the process more efficient.” With prior authorization software, payer rules can be automatically updated so staff always know they’re looking at the latest information and don’t need to input data by hand. For example, Experian Health’s SmartAgent feature can sign the user into the appropriate payer website and auto-fill relevant patient information, saving time and reducing the risk of error. Dynamic work queues can help staff navigate the process with confidence and reconcile all the relevant data points within each patient’s specific situation. Henry also recommends doing knowledge-based checks to determine whether a patient’s planned procedure needs pre-authorization. Having records and supporting documentation in place can help handle rework and prevent errors from occurring in the first place. Engaging with payers to build stronger relationships is another strategy to support smoother authorizations. Again, reliable solutions and digital tools can simplify each of these tasks. Watch the full interview and download the State of Patient Access 2.0 white paper to find out more about how automation and digital tools can ease the burden and help with streamlining prior authorizations. By streamlining prior authorizations, providers can reduce unnecessary costs and deliver faster, high-quality care to patients.