Latest Post
When it comes to medical coding and billing, accuracy is everything. Even the smallest error can result in a claim being bounced back by the payer, causing delays and missed revenue opportunities. Coding requirements change frequently, and with denials totaling billions of dollars per year, providers can’t afford to risk under- or over-coding or relying on outdated codes. Automation and software-driven solutions can uncomplicate the complex world of medical coding. Getting claims right the first time accelerates the adjudication process, leading to faster and higher reimbursements. Providers can make more reliable financial forecasts, avoid losing time reworking rejected claims, and give patients greater clarity about what they’ll owe. For this reason, providers should brush up on medical coding and billing best practices to improve claims management and maximize reimbursements. Here are 7 areas to focus on: 1. Stay up-to-date with coding changes Medical codes convert information about the patient’s healthcare encounter into an electronic format that payers use to adjudicate claims for reimbursement. If a claim includes outdated, incorrect or missing codes, then it will be denied. The most common medical coding systems include: International Classification of Disease 10th edition (ICD-10) codes: these codes denote the patient’s diagnosis or condition. The 11th version was published in January 2022, and while the implementation timeline in the US remains unclear, providers will need to be ready to adapt. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes: Where ICD codes describe the patient’s symptoms, CPT codes record their treatment. If there’s a discrepancy between diagnosis and treatment, the claim is likely to be denied. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use these to apply CPT codes to procedures, services, products and equipment offered to Medicaid and Medicare patients and those covered by private insurance. These codes are constantly being revised and are often recycled, so coders must pay close attention to avoid errors. National Drug Code (NDC): claims need to include NDC codes when the patient is taking prescribed or over-the-counter medications. The NDC directory is updated daily. Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) codes: these combine ICD and CPT codes to determine the final amount that a hospital can be reimbursed. CMS assigns annually calculated weightings to DRGs based on severity and length of illness, treatment trends and other factors. There are also multiple coding directories for different specialties, such as dental care, mental health and patients with disabilities. With hundreds of thousands of constantly-changing codable terms to consider, medical coders face a daunting task. In the past, coders would rely on manual coding directories to find the right codes, but today, most use digital encoders and digital coding libraries to generate electronic codes. For example, Experian Health’s claims management software integrates government and payer edits so that no changes to coding requirements are missed. Each patient encounter can be processed in real time and incorrect codes can be flagged before the claim is submitted. 2. Automate the claims management process to increase medical billing and coding accuracy Manually matching each patient encounter to a specific set of codes is time-consuming and vulnerable to errors. Software programs improve the process by analyzing unstructured clinical charts and notes to draw out information relevant to the claim. They can cross-reference multiple coding directories in an instant to identify the correct code. They also compile data in standardized, interoperable formats so information can be exchanged between coding and billing teams, clearinghouse staff and payer systems with ease. While some of the output generated by machine learning systems still needs to be checked by human eyes, automated solutions drastically reduce the burden on staff and ensure greater accuracy. With automated claims management, medical coding and billing teams can optimize their workflows, submit cleaner claims, and get insights into the root causes of denials. Case study: see how Summit Medical Group Oregon – Bend Memorial Clinic used automated claims management technology to achieve a primary clean claims rate of 92%. 3. Eliminate workflow inefficiencies to save time According to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH), automation could save more than an hour of staff time for every three claim status checks. Automation frees up staff to focus on the highest priority tasks that require a human touch. Fewer errors mean less time spent on reworking denied claims. And if claims are processed more quickly, this means that they reach the payer adjudication stage sooner which ultimately will result in faster payments. The medical coding and billing process takes anywhere from a week to a few months, so every hour saved makes a difference. To this end, Enhanced Claim Status monitors how claims are progressing through the claims adjudication process, reducing the amount of time staff need to spend interacting with payers. It eliminates manual follow-up and allows teams to address pending, returned, denied and zero-pay transactions before the Electronic Remittance Advice and Explanation of Benefits are processed. Worklists are generated based on actionable data so staff can work more productively, and claims get settled sooner. 4. Customize claims edits to your specifications One way to drive up medical coding accuracy is to use customized claims edits. Some claims management software solutions only apply updates using universal claim edits or using groups of edits. This doesn’t work for large medical groups that need to cover multiple combinations of payer, specialty and geographical edits. Since no two payer policies are the same, claims edits would need to be checked manually to make sure nothing has been missed. Experian Health’s claims management software solves this by incorporating government and commercial edits alongside client-specific customized edits. Providers can keep pace with changes and capture the requirements of all reimbursement policies that are relevant to a particular claim. For example, ClaimSource runs front-end claims editing to coordinate federal, state and commercial payer edits together with customized provider edits to avoid coding errors. Similarly, ClaimScrubber automatically reviews and adjusts claims, helping medical groups streamline claims submissions. 5. Upgrade record-keeping technology to maintain medical billing and coding accuracy If patient records are peppered with typos and outdated contact information, then it’s highly likely that errors will be inherited on claims forms. A fifth of patients have spotted errors in their health records, including incorrect details about diagnoses, medications and test results. Preventing these errors is key to maintaining medical billing and coding accuracy. Interoperable electronic patient records protect against inaccuracies by creating a single, complete record for each patient. With a tool such as Universal Identity Manager, patient data is matched against multiple data sources to verify that the record is complete and accurate. Staff can have confidence that all information held on a patient will be taken into account when their medical encounters are coded, and avoid coding discrepancies that can occur when a patient’s treatment doesn’t seem to match their diagnosis. 6. Double-check claims before submitting Running a line-by-line review of each claim before it’s submitted means errors can be found and fixed before they result in financial losses. This would be a painstaking task to do by hand, but with tools such as ClaimSource and ClaimScrubber, hospitals and medical groups can audit claims automatically to check for coding discrepancies or missing patient information. A streamlined claims cycle benefits payers and patients too. Payers can adjudicate accurately coded claims more quickly without pushing them into a queue for manual review, and patients get earlier clarity about how much they’ll owe. 7. Audit the claims management process to spot medical coding inaccuracies Finally, it makes sense to undertake regular audits of the medical coding and billing procedures to weed out any recurring issues. While a coding audit will focus on coding accuracy and compliance, a billing audit can investigate the systems and processes involved in everything from patient eligibility verification to patient collections. This helps uncover recurring issues with under- and over-coding, use of redundant and retired codes, non-compliance and poor documentation. Again, maintaining robust, quality data and records will make this process easier. Partnering with a single, trusted vendor to deliver an end-to-end claims management solution can help achieve this. Find out more about how Experian Health’s automated claims management solutions can help healthcare organizations maintain medical billing and coding accuracy, drive down denials and create a more predictable revenue cycle.
Patients want and expect digital and contactless payment methods. Learn how healthcare providers can create a better patient payment experience.
From canceling appointments to being surprised by out-of-pocket expenses, this article looks at the key differences in generations and healthcare costs.
Experian Health is very pleased to announce that we've ranked #1 in the 2025 Best in KLAS: Software & Services report, for our Contract Manager and Contract Analysis product, for the third consecutive year. Contract Manager, when paired with Contract Analysis, empowers healthcare providers by ensuring payers comply with contract terms, identifying and recovering underpayments, and arming them with real claims data to negotiate contracts. This enables providers to negotiate more favorable terms and maintain financial stability. Clarissa Riggins, Chief Product Officer at Experian Health, says, “In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, our Contract Manager solution has once again been recognized as the #1 Revenue Cycle Management tool by KLAS for the third consecutive year. This prestigious ranking underscores the significant value our solution delivers to our clients by identifying underpayments and facilitating revenue recovery. We are honored to continue supporting our clients with innovative solutions that drive financial success and operational efficiency.” Learn more about how Contract Manager and Contract Analysis can help your healthcare organization validate reimbursement accuracy, recover underpayments and boost revenue. Learn more Contact us
Experian Health's State of Claims 2024 report reveals a worrying trend in healthcare claim denials, with nearly three-quarters of survey respondents reporting a rise. Around four in ten say claims are denied 10% of the time, with one in ten seeing denial rates above 15%. Denials at this scale, driven by various claim denial reasons, represent billions of dollars in lost or delayed reimbursements, so it's no wonder that reducing health insurance claim denials tops healthcare providers' “must-fix” list. However, despite being highly motivated to resolve the challenge, many organizations need more support to overcome operational roadblocks. Prior authorizations are taking longer to come through. Payer policy changes are more frequent. Patient information is increasingly inaccurate. For 65% of respondents, submitting clean claims is more complex than before the pandemic. With some wrangling more than three technological solutions and others lacking confidence about using automation and AI, providers seem to be struggling to find the sweet spot when tackling denials. This article looks at the reasons for increased claim denials, as well as how automation and artificial intelligence (AI) can help healthcare providers overcome these obstacles to increase operational efficiency and improve cash flow. Major operational challenges leading to increased claim denials Clarissa Riggins, Chief Product Officer at Experian Health, says that many providers are increasingly concerned that payers won't reimburse costs as denial rates increase, when discussing the State of Claims 2024 report. These concerns reflect operational challenges, including difficulty keeping track of pre-authorization requirements, inability to keep up with rapidly changing payer policies and inadequate front-end data collection. While staffing shortages are not among the top three claim denial reasons as they were last year, they are a continuing drag on efficiency for 43% of providers. Burdened by limited resources, these revenue cycle teams are more likely to make avoidable errors during claim submission—a problem that is affecting the four in ten providers who say they have limited resources to cross-check claims for errors. Riggins suggests that healthcare organizations look to technology to close the claims gap: “We had hoped to see a decrease in claim denials from our previous survey, but it's clear these significant challenges are continuing, adding immense pressure on providers to improve their revenue cycle management processes. This growing crisis is a sign that traditional approaches are no longer enough, and providers should adopt more proactive strategies and the latest technology to navigate this volatility.” Top reasons for healthcare claim denials Here are the top three claim denial reasons and how automation and AI can solve them: 1. Missing or inaccurate claims data Missing or inaccurate claims data is the number one operational challenge responsible for the increase in medical billing claim denials – among the top three challenges for 46% of respondents in the State of Claims 2024 survey. Submitting clean claims relies on getting data right the first time. It calls for speed and efficiency, which is impossible with slow, error-prone manual systems. Yet almost half of the respondents say their organizations are reviewing claims manually. While 54% of respondents believe their technology is sufficient to meet claims management demands, increasing errors and rising denials tell a different story. Revenue cycle leaders who embrace automation in their claims submission and denial prevention strategy set themselves up for smoother operations and a boost to the bottom line. Without the right automation to increase the speed and accuracy of claim submissions, valuable staff time and effort are wasted on manually processing error-prone claims, increasing the likelihood of denial. The lack of automation also places unnecessary strain on staff, diverting their attention from more complex claims issues. 2. Prior authorizations Claim denials often stem from poor communication between payer and provider systems, with the prior authorization process as a prime example. The process requires providers to seek agreement from the payer to cover a service or item before it is administered to the patient. Failure to do so results in the claim for that treatment being denied. Unfortunately, obtaining prior authorizations is not always straightforward; sometimes, the patient's treatment must begin before the authorization process is concluded. Other times, the authorization only covers certain aspects of the treatment. Not only is the prior authorization process complex, but it is also costly, laborious, and time-consuming to navigate successfully. According to the 2023 AMA Prior Authorization Physician Survey, physicians and their staff spend 12 hours per week completing prior authorizations, with almost all reporting physician burnout as a result. Providers must stay on top of frequent changes to payer policies, and staff must use multiple payer portals to track authorization requests. Unsurprisingly, authorizations are among the top three claim denial reasons for 36% of respondents in the State of Claims survey. As with any challenge involving digital systems “talking” to one another, authorizations are a great use case for automation. Automation can be used to check payer policy changes, alert staff when prior authorization is needed, gather relevant documentation, and review authorization requests for accuracy. This significantly reduces the burden on staff and minimizes the risk of claims being submitted without the necessary authorizations in place. Experian Health's Prior Authorizations technology automates authorization inquiries and checks requirements in real time. It uses AI to help users find and access the appropriate payer portal to speed up the authorization workflow. Users will have confidence that they're looking at the same account information and policy details as the payer, which means lengthy negotiations can be avoided. Staff also get accurate status updates on pending and denied submissions so they can take appropriate action and maximize reimbursement. 3. Inaccurate or incomplete patient data Even the slightest mistake or mismatch in a patient's name, address or insurance details can result in a denial, leading to payment delays and extra work for the staff. These denials are particularly frustrating because they should be avoidable. Automation can be used to pre-fill the patient's information before they arrive to avoid the errors that occur with manual input. This has the added benefit of accelerating registration. These solutions can also check for duplicate charges, missing fields and coding inaccuracies. For example, Claim Scrubber helps providers prepare error-free claims for processing by reviewing each line of the claim before it's submitted. ClaimSource® helps providers manage the entire claims cycle by creating custom work queues and automating claims processing to ensure that claims are clean the first time. Implementing technology to prevent claim denials The report details some of the strategies providers are using to try to reduce denials. These include upgrading existing claims process technology, automating or expanding patient portal claims reviews, and automating tracking of payer policy changes. More than half are motivated to adopt new technology to reduce manual input. This is exactly what Denial Workflow Manager is designed to do. It enables providers to track claim status and appeals and quickly identify those that need to be followed up on. It eliminates the need for manual review, while analysis and reporting give staff insights into the root causes of denials to optimize performance. This solution can be integrated with tools like Enhanced Claim Status, which sends automatic status requests based on the type of claim and specific payer timeframes. It generates accurate adjudication reports within 24-72 hours to accelerate the revenue cycle. The output is viewable in ClaimSource to streamline workflows and manage the claims process in a single online application. Automation and digital technology are also valuable counterweights to the shortage of qualified staff. While staffing shortages aren't as high on the list of concerns as in previous years, they remain a stubborn problem. By reducing the need for manual input, claims management can be accelerated while freeing staff to focus their attention where it matters most. Experian Health was client-rated #1 by Black Book™ ’24 in Denial & Claims Management Outsourcing, Health Systems. Learn more AI solutions for reducing claim denials Healthcare organizations can get more bang for their buck from automation by integrating these solutions alongside AI. Interestingly, the survey suggests that providers have mixed feelings towards AI: 35% of providers say they want solutions that leverage more AI and machine learning, yet only 8% are actually using them. Current ClaimSource users might consider AI Advantage™, which uses AI and automation to generate real-time insights for a proactive approach to denial management. It helps providers combat claim denials from two angles: AI Advantage – Predictive Denials uses AI to identify undocumented payer adjudication rules that result in new denials. It identifies claims with a high likelihood of denial based on an organization's historical payment data and allows them to intervene before claim submission. AI Advantage – Denial Triage comes into play if a claim has been denied. This component uses advanced algorithms to identify and intelligently segment denials based on potential value so that organizations can focus on resubmissions that most impact their bottom line. Doing so removes the guesswork, alleviates staff burdens, and eliminates time spent on low-value denials. This solution complements existing claims management workflows to help providers expedite claims processing, reduce denials, and maximize revenue. Another AI-powered solution helps prevent denials on the front end: Patient Access Curator allows patient access teams to capture multiple data points in seconds. This solution solves the “bad data” problem, using AI and robotic process automation to run checks for eligibility, coordination of benefits, Medicare Beneficiary Identifier, demographics and coverage discovery with a single click. The financial impact of denials and the ROI of technology Another paradoxical finding in the report is that while 47% of respondents see having AI technology as a competitive advantage, less than half say they'd be up for fully replacing their existing claims processing technology, even if presented with compelling ROI projections. Automation and AI can meaningfully impact the claims metrics that keep revenue cycle leaders awake at night – denial rates and clean claim rates being the top two. Patients also want to see improved performance when it comes to reducing denials. If healthcare organizations cannot offer a reliable, error-free system, they risk losing patients' trust and loyalty. Providers who demonstrate a well-managed claims system with swift and accurate results will inspire confidence and improve patient engagement. It's essential to assess how existing solutions perform against these metrics and implement upgraded solutions to deliver a more substantial ROI. AI and automation in practice How are Experian Health's clients using AI and automation to reduce claim denials? Here are a few examples: In only six months of adopting AI Advantage for claims processing and reducing claims denial, Schneck Medical Center saw denials fall by an average of 4.6% each month. In addition, the time needed to correct claims dropped from 15 to less than five minutes. The ambulatory clinic Summit Medical Group Oregon implemented Experian Health's claims management solutions, including Enhanced Claim Status and Claim Scrubber, to improve its registration and coding processes. These two solutions helped the team submit cleaner claims, resulting in a decrease in denials. As a result, the company now maintains a 92% primary clean claims rate. Another compelling example of the positive impact of technology on healthcare claims management is IU Health's experience with the all-in-one claim cycle management platform ClaimSource. With ClaimSource, IU Health managed the transmission of $632 million in claims in five days and processed $1.1 billion of claims backlog. Clients who have implemented Experian Health's Patient Access Curator have saved over $1 billion in denied claims, significantly boosting their bottom lines. Experian Health ranked #1 in Best In KLAS for our ClaimSource® claims management system – for the second consecutive year. Learn more Enhancing revenue cycles by addressing claim denial reasons By pinpointing the most common health insurance claim denial reasons and adopting automation and AI-driven solutions, providers can increase the first-pass clean claim rate, ramp up the likelihood of reimbursement, and reduce the overhead of reworking and resubmitting claims. Inevitably, hospitals will witness a surge in their financial performance. Contact us today to learn how data-driven claims management technology can help your organization reduce denied claims in healthcare and increase ROI. Improve claims management Contact us
The denial challenge is getting tougher. In Experian Health's latest State of Claims 2024 survey, almost three-quarters of healthcare administrators agree that claim denials are increasing. The majority also agree that difficulties with claims—like reimbursement times, errors, and payer policy changes—are becoming more common. It's no surprise that denial prevention is a priority for 84% of respondents. However, many organizations still focus on reactive strategies, like working harder with denial management teams or appealing claims once the denial comes through. These efforts have their place, but they only address the problem after it occurs. It's a time-consuming, costly and ultimately inefficient way to face the denial challenge overall. A better approach is to figure out how to prevent claim denials in the first place. This article looks at how to build a proactive denial prevention strategy using automation and artificial intelligence (AI), to streamline claims processing and nip denials in the bud. Understanding denial prevention in healthcare Preventing denials starts with understanding the “ins and outs” of the claims process, particularly payer requirements. Denials occur when a payer refuses to reimburse a provider for services rendered, often due to avoidable coding errors, missing documentation or procedural mistakes. When that happens, providers are left to rework the submission or look elsewhere – most likely to the patient – to fill the funding gap. Many are simply written off to bad debt. To avoid receiving an 835 file with the dreaded claim denial notice, providers must focus on the root causes of denials and get ahead of the pitfalls. The importance of claim denial prevention With denial rates exceeding pre-pandemic levels, 42% of survey respondents say the economy and declining consumer confidence make payer reimbursements more urgent. While financial stability is the obvious driver for getting claims right the first time, denial prevention also improves operational efficiency and reduces the billing and coding staff workload. Denials are frustrating for patients and staff. When claims are processed correctly the first time, providers avoid delays and billing complications and reduce patient stress over unexpected costs. Preventing denials is critical for maintaining trust and ensuring patients feel secure about their financial obligations. How to prevent claim denials Denial prevention strategies should start with addressing the underlying causes of denials. Here are five denial prevention strategies to consider: 1. Improve data accuracy from the start Garbage in, garbage out. If patient information, insurance eligibility, prior authorizations and billing codes are input incorrectly or missing altogether, providers will continue to submit error-filled claims that have no hope of being paid. Tools like Registration Accelerator and Patient Access Curator can verify relevant data for accuracy before claim submission and reduce the risk of denial. 2. Use AI and automation for efficiency If there was ever a case for using automation and artificial intelligence, it's in claim denial prevention. However, around half of providers are still using manual processes, leaving them playing catch-up to the payers who are already using AI to work at scale. Only 10% have automated the process, using AI to correct and resubmit claims. Tools like ClaimSource® can automate eligibility verification and coding, perform error checks before submissions and ensure claims meet payer requirements instantly. This cuts the time and effort wasted on manual processes, releasing staff to focus on activities that need human attention. 3. Automate pre-claim scrubbing to catch errors A great use case for automation is in providing an extra pair of eyes to pore over claims and catch common errors like missing data and wrong codes before submission. Experian Health's Claim Scrubber analyzes claims line by line to ensure that claims are submitted to payers and clearinghouses without errors, increase first-time pass rates and prevent rebilling. 4. Track performance for ongoing improvement Every denial prevention strategy should include monitoring and reporting. Tools that offer real-time tracking of key performance indicators such as denial rates, clean claim percentages, resubmission times, and the reasons for denials can help staff identify patterns. With these insights, they'll have complete visibility into any recurring problems clogging up their claims processes. 5. Outsource to a trusted vendor for extra support and expertise Finally, providers might consider outsourcing denial prevention to a specialist vendor who can help them develop the right strategy and toolkit to streamline billing, improve data integrity and manage claims to ease pressure on internal resources. Experian Health was client-rated #1 by Black Book™ ’24 in Denial & Claims Management Outsourcing, Health Systems. Learn more Proactively reducing claim denials These strategies raise an important question: can existing revenue cycle technology handle the increasing volume of denials? Healthcare administrators aren't convinced: only 54% of survey respondents feel their organization's technology is sufficient to meet demand, down 23 percentage points since 2022. To implement these denial prevention strategies effectively, providers may need to consider upgrading their toolkit rather than relying on traditional systems. Experian Health offers two AI-powered solutions that help providers better predict and prevent denials: Prevent denials with Patient Access Curator Too many denials originate in patient access, so prevention must start here. Patient Access Curator uses AI-driven data capture technology to verify patient details quickly and accurately. With a single click, PAC can automatically check eligibility verification, coordination of benefits, Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers, coverage discovery and financial status. Running multiple manual queries is a thing of the past, saving staff hours and propagating clean data throughout the entire revenue cycle. Watch the webinar to learn more about how Patient Access Curator helps prevent denials with accurate data from the start. Predict denials with AI AdvantageTM Clean data sets the stage for denial prevention, but AI adds an extra layer of protection by forecasting potential issues before it's too late. AI AdvantageTM does this in two ways. First, the Predictive Denials component analyzes claims using the provider's own ClaimSource® data and alerts staff to high-risk claims so errors, inconsistencies or missing documentation can be corrected before submission. Next, the Denial Triage component prevents missed revenue opportunities by segmenting denials and guiding staff to those worth reworking. See how AI Advantage works: If providers can't prevent denials, they can't protect their bottom line. With the right data analytics, automation and AI, providers can take control and spot issues before they become problems instead of spinning their wheels in endless rework. With more advanced tech on their side, it's possible to close the gap with payers and prevent denials, but it also gives staff the headspace to focus on patient care and support. Find out more about how Experian Health's Claims Management solutions help providers build effective denial prevention strategies and reduce lost revenue. Learn more Contact us
