Latest Post
The repercussions of errors on the healthcare claims processing workflow can be major and wide-ranging. It slows the revenue cycle, interrupts cash flow, consumes staff hours, creates frustration for staff and patients, and, in the worst cases, sacrifices revenue. Errors are a perennial—maybe even inevitable—problem but understanding some common reasons behind these mistakes can help. Additionally, digital claims management tools can help you automate claims processing to reduce claims errors, submit cleaner claims, and get paid successfully. In June 2022, Experian Health surveyed 200 revenue cycle decision-makers to understand the current state of claims management. Watch the video to see the results: Any number of claim errors can lead to denials: incorrect medical coding, missing prior authorizations, clearinghouse issues and more. Here are 7 of the most common reasons for claim errors: 1. Claim errors can be caused by missing and inaccurate data “The number one denial issue most providers encounter is eligibility,” says Rob Stucker, Senior Vice President at Experian Health. “These issues begin upstream from the claims process during registration or pre-registration when the patient information that’s collected is either inaccurate or incomplete. It may be as simple as a patient giving their name as Rob instead of Robert, or the registration staff selecting Medicaid as the payer, instead of Medicaid Managed Care. If the eligibility information is even slightly off, the claim will come back as denied.” Collecting accurate demographic and insurance information up-front using digital patient intake tools opens the digital front door and can help eliminate errors during the healthcare claims management process. 2. Manual processes and disparate systems Wherever claims processes are not automated, human error and delays can set in. In addition to typical random glitches and mistakes, many healthcare providers struggle with disparate systems from multiple vendors, in which the front-end and back-end do not communicate seamlessly. Using a single vendor with solutions that manage the entire claims processing cycle can provide holistic help. ClaimSource manages eligibility validation by repurposing Experian eligibility transactions that providers have already run at registration and editing them against the claim. This process allows providers to double-check the eligibility of the claim before it gets submitted, at no additional cost. In addition, it also does extensive claim editing, submissions, reconciliations, and reporting. This solution creates prioritized workflows and provides access to a national library of documented government and commercial payer edits, as well as custom edits, to meet individual provider needs. 3. Changes in payer requirements can cause claims errors “Providers tell us that a major pain point is constantly changing payer rules,” says Stucker. “Providers are confident that their claims are good, but the payers’ adjudication rules may have changed without prior notice.” The problem here is exponential: voluminous changes multiplied by a range of communication channels (or faulty communication) multiplied again by a proliferation of payers and policies. Keeping pace with these changes is difficult without partner support. “We continuously monitor hundreds of thousands of payer website pages each night for updates,” says Stucker. “When a change is flagged, an analyst looks at it and decides whether it should be added as an edit. We update our huge global library of edits on a weekly or even daily basis. These edits enable ClaimSource and our pre-837 editor, Claim Scrubber to automatically review claims for errors using the most recent payer updates. 4. Prior authorizations Pre-authorizations present challenges at many levels. 8 in 10 providers saw prior authorization requirements increase during 2021. Providers must track changing requirements, obtain authorizations prior to treatment or claims submission, and complete claims that meet complex requirements. When prior authorization requirements aren’t met, appealing a denial can be complicated at best, and many times prove to be irreversible. According to Medical Group Management Association data, a simple denial takes a seasoned biller two to eight minutes to work, but a complicated denial involving prior authorization requirements can take up to an hour to work, largely thanks to time spent on hold. Ensuring claims are completed as required in the first place using a pre-authorization tool, in combination with a claims editor that validates against pre-authorizations, saves valuable time and stress. 5. Short staffing and new trainees Staff hours and expertise are both in short supply, as many providers struggle to retain experienced staff and bring new hires up to speed. Having an automated process with built-in review and analytics can help ensure that claims are completed accurately and quickly. A Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare study found automated claims take 25% less time to process than manual claims, boosting productivity and freeing staff up for the more human-intensive aspects of their work. However, the key is “accurate and user-friendly” automation. A claims vendor should be keeping edits up to date, submitting claims timely and accurately to the correct payer, keep organizations informed on the claim’s status throughout the adjudication process, retrieve electronic remit files, link them to the correct claims, and establish a denial workflow to automatically show denials. This should all be done in an extremely easy to use user interface or directly back into Patient Accounting/Practice Management Systems. If vendors aren’t doing this, then staff will just be working harder instead of smarter. 6. Slow response and follow-through can lead to claim errors Although delays themselves don’t necessarily cause errors, they can make resolution difficult and time-consuming. Time is always an issue for providers as claims must be submitted in specific time frames from the date of service. Therefore, getting the claim created, processed through a claims vendor and submitted to the correct payer must be done efficiently, or timely filing deadlines are missed. The same is true for identifying and re-working denials. Denial backlogs quickly become overwhelming, increasing the odds of items slipping through the cracks or re-submission/appeal deadlines being missed. Automating status updates with enhanced claim status monitoring can relieve time-strapped staff of having to contact payers manually for the latest information on claims to find out which ones are being paid or denied. Enhanced Claim Status submits automatic status requests based on each payer’s adjudication timeline from the date of claim submission, returning the payer’s proprietary responses weeks before the Electronic Remittance Advice or Explanation of Benefits are processed. This gives staff a huge head start on working denials. 7. Difficulty managing denials When errors cause claims to be denied, a response is critical. A denials workflow management solution can optimize follow-up by identifying claim denials, holds, suspensions, zero-pays, and prioritizing denials that need the fastest attention. Denial Workflow Manager also allows organizations to track root causes, which in turn can identify operational changes that can be made upstream, and reduce the denials from happening to being with. Automation is the future of effective claims management Claims management is becoming more complex and demanding, but the digital tools that automate and improve processes can help providers rise to the occasion. It’s now possible to capture and use accurate data, integrate systems and processes to work together, stay up to date on payer requirements, track claim status, and even manage denials efficiently with the help of technology. Learn more about other solutions that can help healthcare organizations with claims management.
Learn how providers can create a compassionate financial experience and maximize collections with Patient Financial Clearance.
Discover how telehealth can help healthcare providers keep patients’ digital demands firmly in their sights and secure a competitive edge.
Experian Health is very pleased to announce that we've ranked #1 in the 2025 Best in KLAS: Software & Services report, for our Contract Manager and Contract Analysis product, for the third consecutive year. Contract Manager, when paired with Contract Analysis, empowers healthcare providers by ensuring payers comply with contract terms, identifying and recovering underpayments, and arming them with real claims data to negotiate contracts. This enables providers to negotiate more favorable terms and maintain financial stability. Clarissa Riggins, Chief Product Officer at Experian Health, says, “In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, our Contract Manager solution has once again been recognized as the #1 Revenue Cycle Management tool by KLAS for the third consecutive year. This prestigious ranking underscores the significant value our solution delivers to our clients by identifying underpayments and facilitating revenue recovery. We are honored to continue supporting our clients with innovative solutions that drive financial success and operational efficiency.” Learn more about how Contract Manager and Contract Analysis can help your healthcare organization validate reimbursement accuracy, recover underpayments and boost revenue. Learn more Contact us
Experian Health's State of Claims 2024 report reveals a worrying trend in healthcare claim denials, with nearly three-quarters of survey respondents reporting a rise. Around four in ten say claims are denied 10% of the time, with one in ten seeing denial rates above 15%. Denials at this scale, driven by various claim denial reasons, represent billions of dollars in lost or delayed reimbursements, so it's no wonder that reducing health insurance claim denials tops healthcare providers' “must-fix” list. However, despite being highly motivated to resolve the challenge, many organizations need more support to overcome operational roadblocks. Prior authorizations are taking longer to come through. Payer policy changes are more frequent. Patient information is increasingly inaccurate. For 65% of respondents, submitting clean claims is more complex than before the pandemic. With some wrangling more than three technological solutions and others lacking confidence about using automation and AI, providers seem to be struggling to find the sweet spot when tackling denials. This article looks at the reasons for increased claim denials, as well as how automation and artificial intelligence (AI) can help healthcare providers overcome these obstacles to increase operational efficiency and improve cash flow. Major operational challenges leading to increased claim denials Clarissa Riggins, Chief Product Officer at Experian Health, says that many providers are increasingly concerned that payers won't reimburse costs as denial rates increase, when discussing the State of Claims 2024 report. These concerns reflect operational challenges, including difficulty keeping track of pre-authorization requirements, inability to keep up with rapidly changing payer policies and inadequate front-end data collection. While staffing shortages are not among the top three claim denial reasons as they were last year, they are a continuing drag on efficiency for 43% of providers. Burdened by limited resources, these revenue cycle teams are more likely to make avoidable errors during claim submission—a problem that is affecting the four in ten providers who say they have limited resources to cross-check claims for errors. Riggins suggests that healthcare organizations look to technology to close the claims gap: “We had hoped to see a decrease in claim denials from our previous survey, but it's clear these significant challenges are continuing, adding immense pressure on providers to improve their revenue cycle management processes. This growing crisis is a sign that traditional approaches are no longer enough, and providers should adopt more proactive strategies and the latest technology to navigate this volatility.” Top reasons for healthcare claim denials Here are the top three claim denial reasons and how automation and AI can solve them: 1. Missing or inaccurate claims data Missing or inaccurate claims data is the number one operational challenge responsible for the increase in medical billing claim denials – among the top three challenges for 46% of respondents in the State of Claims 2024 survey. Submitting clean claims relies on getting data right the first time. It calls for speed and efficiency, which is impossible with slow, error-prone manual systems. Yet almost half of the respondents say their organizations are reviewing claims manually. While 54% of respondents believe their technology is sufficient to meet claims management demands, increasing errors and rising denials tell a different story. Revenue cycle leaders who embrace automation in their claims submission and denial prevention strategy set themselves up for smoother operations and a boost to the bottom line. Without the right automation to increase the speed and accuracy of claim submissions, valuable staff time and effort are wasted on manually processing error-prone claims, increasing the likelihood of denial. The lack of automation also places unnecessary strain on staff, diverting their attention from more complex claims issues. 2. Prior authorizations Claim denials often stem from poor communication between payer and provider systems, with the prior authorization process as a prime example. The process requires providers to seek agreement from the payer to cover a service or item before it is administered to the patient. Failure to do so results in the claim for that treatment being denied. Unfortunately, obtaining prior authorizations is not always straightforward; sometimes, the patient's treatment must begin before the authorization process is concluded. Other times, the authorization only covers certain aspects of the treatment. Not only is the prior authorization process complex, but it is also costly, laborious, and time-consuming to navigate successfully. According to the 2023 AMA Prior Authorization Physician Survey, physicians and their staff spend 12 hours per week completing prior authorizations, with almost all reporting physician burnout as a result. Providers must stay on top of frequent changes to payer policies, and staff must use multiple payer portals to track authorization requests. Unsurprisingly, authorizations are among the top three claim denial reasons for 36% of respondents in the State of Claims survey. As with any challenge involving digital systems “talking” to one another, authorizations are a great use case for automation. Automation can be used to check payer policy changes, alert staff when prior authorization is needed, gather relevant documentation, and review authorization requests for accuracy. This significantly reduces the burden on staff and minimizes the risk of claims being submitted without the necessary authorizations in place. Experian Health's Prior Authorizations technology automates authorization inquiries and checks requirements in real time. It uses AI to help users find and access the appropriate payer portal to speed up the authorization workflow. Users will have confidence that they're looking at the same account information and policy details as the payer, which means lengthy negotiations can be avoided. Staff also get accurate status updates on pending and denied submissions so they can take appropriate action and maximize reimbursement. 3. Inaccurate or incomplete patient data Even the slightest mistake or mismatch in a patient's name, address or insurance details can result in a denial, leading to payment delays and extra work for the staff. These denials are particularly frustrating because they should be avoidable. Automation can be used to pre-fill the patient's information before they arrive to avoid the errors that occur with manual input. This has the added benefit of accelerating registration. These solutions can also check for duplicate charges, missing fields and coding inaccuracies. For example, Claim Scrubber helps providers prepare error-free claims for processing by reviewing each line of the claim before it's submitted. ClaimSource® helps providers manage the entire claims cycle by creating custom work queues and automating claims processing to ensure that claims are clean the first time. Implementing technology to prevent claim denials The report details some of the strategies providers are using to try to reduce denials. These include upgrading existing claims process technology, automating or expanding patient portal claims reviews, and automating tracking of payer policy changes. More than half are motivated to adopt new technology to reduce manual input. This is exactly what Denial Workflow Manager is designed to do. It enables providers to track claim status and appeals and quickly identify those that need to be followed up on. It eliminates the need for manual review, while analysis and reporting give staff insights into the root causes of denials to optimize performance. This solution can be integrated with tools like Enhanced Claim Status, which sends automatic status requests based on the type of claim and specific payer timeframes. It generates accurate adjudication reports within 24-72 hours to accelerate the revenue cycle. The output is viewable in ClaimSource to streamline workflows and manage the claims process in a single online application. Automation and digital technology are also valuable counterweights to the shortage of qualified staff. While staffing shortages aren't as high on the list of concerns as in previous years, they remain a stubborn problem. By reducing the need for manual input, claims management can be accelerated while freeing staff to focus their attention where it matters most. Experian Health was client-rated #1 by Black Book™ ’24 in Denial & Claims Management Outsourcing, Health Systems. Learn more AI solutions for reducing claim denials Healthcare organizations can get more bang for their buck from automation by integrating these solutions alongside AI. Interestingly, the survey suggests that providers have mixed feelings towards AI: 35% of providers say they want solutions that leverage more AI and machine learning, yet only 8% are actually using them. Current ClaimSource users might consider AI Advantage™, which uses AI and automation to generate real-time insights for a proactive approach to denial management. It helps providers combat claim denials from two angles: AI Advantage – Predictive Denials uses AI to identify undocumented payer adjudication rules that result in new denials. It identifies claims with a high likelihood of denial based on an organization's historical payment data and allows them to intervene before claim submission. AI Advantage – Denial Triage comes into play if a claim has been denied. This component uses advanced algorithms to identify and intelligently segment denials based on potential value so that organizations can focus on resubmissions that most impact their bottom line. Doing so removes the guesswork, alleviates staff burdens, and eliminates time spent on low-value denials. This solution complements existing claims management workflows to help providers expedite claims processing, reduce denials, and maximize revenue. Another AI-powered solution helps prevent denials on the front end: Patient Access Curator allows patient access teams to capture multiple data points in seconds. This solution solves the “bad data” problem, using AI and robotic process automation to run checks for eligibility, coordination of benefits, Medicare Beneficiary Identifier, demographics and coverage discovery with a single click. The financial impact of denials and the ROI of technology Another paradoxical finding in the report is that while 47% of respondents see having AI technology as a competitive advantage, less than half say they'd be up for fully replacing their existing claims processing technology, even if presented with compelling ROI projections. Automation and AI can meaningfully impact the claims metrics that keep revenue cycle leaders awake at night – denial rates and clean claim rates being the top two. Patients also want to see improved performance when it comes to reducing denials. If healthcare organizations cannot offer a reliable, error-free system, they risk losing patients' trust and loyalty. Providers who demonstrate a well-managed claims system with swift and accurate results will inspire confidence and improve patient engagement. It's essential to assess how existing solutions perform against these metrics and implement upgraded solutions to deliver a more substantial ROI. AI and automation in practice How are Experian Health's clients using AI and automation to reduce claim denials? Here are a few examples: In only six months of adopting AI Advantage for claims processing and reducing claims denial, Schneck Medical Center saw denials fall by an average of 4.6% each month. In addition, the time needed to correct claims dropped from 15 to less than five minutes. The ambulatory clinic Summit Medical Group Oregon implemented Experian Health's claims management solutions, including Enhanced Claim Status and Claim Scrubber, to improve its registration and coding processes. These two solutions helped the team submit cleaner claims, resulting in a decrease in denials. As a result, the company now maintains a 92% primary clean claims rate. Another compelling example of the positive impact of technology on healthcare claims management is IU Health's experience with the all-in-one claim cycle management platform ClaimSource. With ClaimSource, IU Health managed the transmission of $632 million in claims in five days and processed $1.1 billion of claims backlog. Clients who have implemented Experian Health's Patient Access Curator have saved over $1 billion in denied claims, significantly boosting their bottom lines. Experian Health ranked #1 in Best In KLAS for our ClaimSource® claims management system – for the second consecutive year. Learn more Enhancing revenue cycles by addressing claim denial reasons By pinpointing the most common health insurance claim denial reasons and adopting automation and AI-driven solutions, providers can increase the first-pass clean claim rate, ramp up the likelihood of reimbursement, and reduce the overhead of reworking and resubmitting claims. Inevitably, hospitals will witness a surge in their financial performance. Contact us today to learn how data-driven claims management technology can help your organization reduce denied claims in healthcare and increase ROI. Improve claims management Contact us
The denial challenge is getting tougher. In Experian Health's latest State of Claims 2024 survey, almost three-quarters of healthcare administrators agree that claim denials are increasing. The majority also agree that difficulties with claims—like reimbursement times, errors, and payer policy changes—are becoming more common. It's no surprise that denial prevention is a priority for 84% of respondents. However, many organizations still focus on reactive strategies, like working harder with denial management teams or appealing claims once the denial comes through. These efforts have their place, but they only address the problem after it occurs. It's a time-consuming, costly and ultimately inefficient way to face the denial challenge overall. A better approach is to figure out how to prevent claim denials in the first place. This article looks at how to build a proactive denial prevention strategy using automation and artificial intelligence (AI), to streamline claims processing and nip denials in the bud. Understanding denial prevention in healthcare Preventing denials starts with understanding the “ins and outs” of the claims process, particularly payer requirements. Denials occur when a payer refuses to reimburse a provider for services rendered, often due to avoidable coding errors, missing documentation or procedural mistakes. When that happens, providers are left to rework the submission or look elsewhere – most likely to the patient – to fill the funding gap. Many are simply written off to bad debt. To avoid receiving an 835 file with the dreaded claim denial notice, providers must focus on the root causes of denials and get ahead of the pitfalls. The importance of claim denial prevention With denial rates exceeding pre-pandemic levels, 42% of survey respondents say the economy and declining consumer confidence make payer reimbursements more urgent. While financial stability is the obvious driver for getting claims right the first time, denial prevention also improves operational efficiency and reduces the billing and coding staff workload. Denials are frustrating for patients and staff. When claims are processed correctly the first time, providers avoid delays and billing complications and reduce patient stress over unexpected costs. Preventing denials is critical for maintaining trust and ensuring patients feel secure about their financial obligations. How to prevent claim denials Denial prevention strategies should start with addressing the underlying causes of denials. Here are five denial prevention strategies to consider: 1. Improve data accuracy from the start Garbage in, garbage out. If patient information, insurance eligibility, prior authorizations and billing codes are input incorrectly or missing altogether, providers will continue to submit error-filled claims that have no hope of being paid. Tools like Registration Accelerator and Patient Access Curator can verify relevant data for accuracy before claim submission and reduce the risk of denial. 2. Use AI and automation for efficiency If there was ever a case for using automation and artificial intelligence, it's in claim denial prevention. However, around half of providers are still using manual processes, leaving them playing catch-up to the payers who are already using AI to work at scale. Only 10% have automated the process, using AI to correct and resubmit claims. Tools like ClaimSource® can automate eligibility verification and coding, perform error checks before submissions and ensure claims meet payer requirements instantly. This cuts the time and effort wasted on manual processes, releasing staff to focus on activities that need human attention. 3. Automate pre-claim scrubbing to catch errors A great use case for automation is in providing an extra pair of eyes to pore over claims and catch common errors like missing data and wrong codes before submission. Experian Health's Claim Scrubber analyzes claims line by line to ensure that claims are submitted to payers and clearinghouses without errors, increase first-time pass rates and prevent rebilling. 4. Track performance for ongoing improvement Every denial prevention strategy should include monitoring and reporting. Tools that offer real-time tracking of key performance indicators such as denial rates, clean claim percentages, resubmission times, and the reasons for denials can help staff identify patterns. With these insights, they'll have complete visibility into any recurring problems clogging up their claims processes. 5. Outsource to a trusted vendor for extra support and expertise Finally, providers might consider outsourcing denial prevention to a specialist vendor who can help them develop the right strategy and toolkit to streamline billing, improve data integrity and manage claims to ease pressure on internal resources. Experian Health was client-rated #1 by Black Book™ ’24 in Denial & Claims Management Outsourcing, Health Systems. Learn more Proactively reducing claim denials These strategies raise an important question: can existing revenue cycle technology handle the increasing volume of denials? Healthcare administrators aren't convinced: only 54% of survey respondents feel their organization's technology is sufficient to meet demand, down 23 percentage points since 2022. To implement these denial prevention strategies effectively, providers may need to consider upgrading their toolkit rather than relying on traditional systems. Experian Health offers two AI-powered solutions that help providers better predict and prevent denials: Prevent denials with Patient Access Curator Too many denials originate in patient access, so prevention must start here. Patient Access Curator uses AI-driven data capture technology to verify patient details quickly and accurately. With a single click, PAC can automatically check eligibility verification, coordination of benefits, Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers, coverage discovery and financial status. Running multiple manual queries is a thing of the past, saving staff hours and propagating clean data throughout the entire revenue cycle. Watch the webinar to learn more about how Patient Access Curator helps prevent denials with accurate data from the start. Predict denials with AI AdvantageTM Clean data sets the stage for denial prevention, but AI adds an extra layer of protection by forecasting potential issues before it's too late. AI AdvantageTM does this in two ways. First, the Predictive Denials component analyzes claims using the provider's own ClaimSource® data and alerts staff to high-risk claims so errors, inconsistencies or missing documentation can be corrected before submission. Next, the Denial Triage component prevents missed revenue opportunities by segmenting denials and guiding staff to those worth reworking. See how AI Advantage works: If providers can't prevent denials, they can't protect their bottom line. With the right data analytics, automation and AI, providers can take control and spot issues before they become problems instead of spinning their wheels in endless rework. With more advanced tech on their side, it's possible to close the gap with payers and prevent denials, but it also gives staff the headspace to focus on patient care and support. Find out more about how Experian Health's Claims Management solutions help providers build effective denial prevention strategies and reduce lost revenue. Learn more Contact us
