National Correct Coding Initiative Edits (NCCI)

by Experian Health 4 min read August 9, 2016

Back in 1996, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) to promote correct coding and prevent inappropriate payment of Medicare Part B claims. As this is an automated prepayment review by CMS, the NCCI edits reduce payment error by identifying coding errors made by providers. In 2009, 7.8 % of Medicare dollars did not comply with one of more Medicare coverage, coding, billing or payment rules, translating into $24.1 billion dollars in Medicare overpayments and underpayments annually.

The NCCI edits define when two HCPCS/CPT® procedure codes may not be reported together except under special circumstances. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) based the NCCI coding policies on current coding conventions, coding guidelines, national and local Medicare policies (NCDs and LCDs), and standard medical and surgical practice. Coding polices and guidelines require that procedures are reported with the most comprehensive CPT® code that describes the services performed. For example, a coder should not report a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP, CPT® 80047) with a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel  CMP,CPT® code 80053) as all the analytes in CPT® 80047 BMP are a subset of the Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and would have been already performed as part of that procedure.

As a claim is processed by the Medicare contractor, the system tests every pair of procedure codes to determine if they comply with the NCCI edit policy. This means every code pair reported for the same date of service for the same beneficiary by the same provider is reviewed against the NCCI-edit tables. If a pair of codes on the claim  matches (“hits”) a pair in the NCCI edit table, the “Column Two” code of the edit pair is denied for payment. Using the CMP/BMP example above, in the NCCI edit tables, CPT® 80047 is the “Column Two” code and would have payment denied.

NCCI-associated modifiers are used to indicate the special circumstances such as when the procedures are performed at different anatomic sites, a separate procedure or repeat clinical diagnostic laboratory test. If an edit allows use of NCCI-associated modifiers, the two procedure codes may be reported together. NCCI-associated modifiers may not be used to bypass an edit unless the criteria for use of the modifier are met.

Each active NCCI edit has a modifier indicator of 0 or 1. A modifier indicator of “0” indicates that an edit can never be bypassed even if a modifier is used. In other words, the Column 2 code of the edit will be denied. A modifier indicator of “1” indicates that an edit may be bypassed with an appropriate modifier appended to the Column 1 and/or Column 2 code.

The NCCI-associated modifiers are: E1, E2, E3, E4, FA, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, LC, LD, RC, LT, RT, TA, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, 25, 27, 58, 59, 78, 79, and 91. In January 1, 2013, additional modifiers were added to the list of NCCI-associated modifiers that will allow an edit to be bypassed when the modifier is used correctly (i.e., edits with modifier indicator of “1”). These were LM (left main coronary artery), RI (ramus intermedius), 24 (unrelated evaluation and management service by the same physician during a postoperative period), and 57 (decision for surgery).

Effective Jan 15, 2015, new more specific modifiers  become effective (see also Compliance Matters, Sept 2014) supplementing Modifier -59 (Distinct Procedural Service).

XE Separate Encounter: A Service That Is Distinct Because It Occurred During A Separate Encounter

XS Separate Structure: A Service That Is Distinct Because It Was Performed On A Separate Organ/Structure

XP Separate Practitioner: A Service That Is Distinct Because It Was Performed By A Different Practitioner

XU Unusual Non-Overlapping Service: The Use Of A Service That Is Distinct Because It Does Not Overlap Usual Components Of The Main Service

These modifiers, collectively referred to as –X{EPSU} modifiers, define specific subsets of the -59 modifier. CMS will not stop recognizing the -59 modifier but notes that CPT instructions state that the -59 modifier should not be used when a more descriptive modifier is available. CMS will continue to recognize the -59 modifier in many instances but may selectively require a more specific – X{EPSU} modifier for billing certain codes at high risk for incorrect billing.

Services denied based on NCCI edits may not be billed to Medicare beneficiaries, nor can a provider use an “Advanced Beneficiary Notice” (ABN) to seek payment from the patient since these denials are based on incorrect coding rather than medical necessity or a benefit exclusion.

Hospitals, like physicians and other providers, must follow national correct coding policies. Though the NCCI edits were initially developed for processing professional claims, the NCCI edits are incorporated into the Outpatient Code Editor (OCE) used for processing outpatient hospital service claims, outpatient physical therapy and speech-language pathology services, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facilities (CORFs), and home health agencies (HHAs). These are commonly referred to as the NCCI “Hospital” Version of CCI edits.

Review the NCCI manual on CMS here: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/NationalCorrectCodInitEd/index.html?redirect=/nationalcorrectcodinited/

Related Posts

Andy’s New WP Workflow Test Article Using Quick Edit

Key takeaways: Revenue cycle teams can use automation to reduce repetitive work and apply AI where data-driven prediction, matching or prioritization can improve a workflow. Experian Health’s 2025 State of Claims survey found that 41% of providers now face denial rates of 10% or higher, while 68% say submitting clean claims is more challenging than a year ago. Patient Access Curator™ (PAC) uses AI to support front-end data validation and insurance discovery, while AI Advantage™ helps teams predict denial risk and prioritize denial follow-up. Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation can support administrative work in healthcare. In the revenue cycle, teams depend on accurate information, timely decisions and efficient follow-up to keep claims moving. In revenue cycle management, AI and automation can help organizations reduce manual checks, find data gaps, predict denial risk and prioritize work queues. These tools are most useful when they support staff judgment, payer expertise and compliance oversight. They can handle repetitive, data-heavy tasks so staff can focus on exceptions and decisions that need human review. In 2023, McKinsey & Company reported that research suggests effectively deploying automation and analytics could eliminate $200 billion to $360 billion of spending in U.S. healthcare. For revenue cycle leaders, the practical question is where to apply those capabilities first. The case for applying AI and automation in healthcare Revenue cycle teams juggle many daily tasks. Staff collect and verify patient information, confirm eligibility, identify the right payer, submit clean claims, monitor status, work denials and manage collections. Small data gaps at the beginning of the process can create downstream rework and delays. Rework also consumes staff time, adding to these operational pressures. As costs rise and revenue cycles tighten, there is increasing pressure to do more with less. Experian Health’s 2025 State of Claims survey found that 54% of providers say claim errors are increasing and 90% of claim denials are reworked with at least some human review before resubmission. Providers are also managing broader financial and administrative pressures. The American Hospital Association has reported that prior authorization requirements, claim audits, denials and other payer policies add administrative burden and cost for hospitals and health systems. These requirements also consume staff time to appeal denials and manage payer processes. AI and automation are different but complementary. Automation follows defined rules to complete repeatable work. AI models can identify patterns in data, predict risk and help teams decide where to focus attention. When used together, they can support more consistent revenue cycle workflows. How AI and automation can support revenue cycle workflows Revenue cycle management automation and AI are most useful when tied to a specific workflow and a measurable operational problem. The goal is to help teams act earlier, reduce avoidable rework and focus staff time where judgment is needed most. For example, automation can complete rule-based eligibility checks. AI can help identify claims with a higher likelihood of denial. In insurance discovery workflows, AI can also help identify coverage that wasn’t captured at registration. When these tools fit into existing workflows, they can support more consistent decisions and reduce manual work. Three practical applications include: 1. Improving front-end data quality with Patient Access Curator Patient and coverage information collected early in the revenue cycle can affect downstream claim outcomes. Incomplete or outdated demographic details, eligibility responses, coordination of benefits or Medicare Beneficiary Identifier information can create problems that lead to claim delays or denials later in the cycle. Experian Health’s Patient Access Curator helps prevent claim denials by validating demographics, eligibility, insurance discovery, coordination of benefits and Medicare Beneficiary Identifier data in seconds. PAC’s AI and machine learning capabilities help improve match accuracy, coverage sequencing and data confidence by writing the validated data back into the host system and sequencing payers before the claim is created. This automates work that would otherwise require manual coverage checks. 2. Using insurance discovery to find coverage not captured at registration When active coverage isn’t identified during registration, claims may be delayed or submitted with incomplete insurance information. Insurance discovery looks for coverage that may not have been captured during registration. Patient Access Curator includes insurance discovery as part of its front-end validation workflow. It can help identify and correct missing or incorrect insurance information so claims can be submitted with more complete coverage data. 3. Using AI to prevent and prioritize denials Even with strong front-end processes, some claims still require additional attention. AI can help claims teams decide which claims to review before submission and which denials to work first after payer response. Experian Health’s AI Advantage supports two denial management use cases:1. AI Advantage – Predictive Denials uses a client’s historical claims data and Experian’s knowledge of payer rules to identify claims with a high likelihood of denial before submission so teams can take corrective action.2. AI Advantage – Denial Triage uses AI to segment denials and identify those with the highest potential for reimbursement. This approach can help teams prioritize with more confidence. Rather than treating every claim or denial the same way, teams can use predictive models to focus on the work that needs the most attention. Potential benefits of AI and automation in the revenue cycle A high-performing revenue cycle depends on timely, accurate and consistent work. AI and automation can help providers modernize that work without losing the expertise of the people who manage complex payer and patient situations every day. When applied to the right workflows, these tools can help organizations: Reduce manual data searches that take staff away from higher-value work Improve front-end data quality before claims are created Identify missing or incorrect coverage information earlier Spot claims that may be at higher risk of denial Prioritize denied claims by potential reimbursement Reduce rework caused by inaccurate or incomplete information Give staff more consistent information for follow-up decisions A focused AI strategy starts with the workflow problem, uses data that is relevant to that problem and keeps staff in control of judgment-based decisions. A more proactive approach to revenue cycle management Revenue cycle teams can move from reactive work toward a more proactive approach: catch errors earlier, validate coverage before claims are created and prioritize the claims and denials that need the most attention. Experian Health offers revenue cycle solutions that use AI and automation in targeted ways to support front-end data quality, reduce rework and manage denials. Patient Access Curator supports registration and coverage validation, while AI Advantage supports denial prediction and triage. Learn more about Experian Health’s Patient Access Curator and AI Advantage.

October 2, 2026 by Andy.Monte@experian.com
Experian Health ranked #1 in Best in KLAS for 2025

Experian Health is very pleased to announce that we've ranked #1 in the 2025 Best in KLAS: Software & Services report, for our Contract Manager and Contract Analysis product, for the third consecutive year. Contract Manager, when paired with Contract Analysis, empowers healthcare providers by ensuring payers comply with contract terms, identifying and recovering underpayments, and arming them with real claims data to negotiate contracts. This enables providers to negotiate more favorable terms and maintain financial stability.  Clarissa Riggins, Chief Product Officer at Experian Health, says, “In the ever-evolving healthcare landscape, our Contract Manager solution has once again been recognized as the #1 Revenue Cycle Management tool by KLAS for the third consecutive year. This prestigious ranking underscores the significant value our solution delivers to our clients by identifying underpayments and facilitating revenue recovery. We are honored to continue supporting our clients with innovative solutions that drive financial success and operational efficiency.”  Learn more about how Contract Manager and Contract Analysis can help your healthcare organization validate reimbursement accuracy, recover underpayments and boost revenue.   Learn more Contact us

February 5, 2025 by kelly.nguyen
How to increase patient engagement

Learn how providers can increase patient engagement, why it matters and key strategies that deliver improved end-to-end patient experiences.

January 30, 2025 by Experian Health

Spotlight test

Spotlight Description

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sticky Subscribe Title

Sticky Subscribe Description
Sticky Subscribe

Testing Spotlight Paragraph block

Testing the spotlight block header

Archive Testing

Categories